An update on the study of playfulness in adolescents: its relationship with academic performance, well-being, anxiety, and roles in bullying-type-situations
Playfulness is an individual differences variable at the trait-level. It describes the ability to experience or (re)frame everyday situations as stimulating, interesting, and/or entertaining. Playfulness in adolescents is understudied. We collected self-report data on four facets of playfulness (other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical) in two German-speaking samples of adolescents (N1 = 210, N2 = 270; age range 13–18 years). The facets correlated positively, but to varying degrees with life satisfaction (social life, self, friends) and intrinsic goals. There was no relationship with self-reported school grades and achievement goals (Sample 1). Playfulness in girls was associated with peer-nominated (classmates) bullying behaviors and victimization status (Sample 2). Overall, the findings show that playfulness has an impact on various domains of the life of adolescents. We discuss directions for further research in the field.
KeywordsAcademic motivation Bullying Peer nomination Playfulness Life satisfaction
The authors are grateful to Anina Wigand and Miriam Fänder for their help with the data collection.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3, 319–336.Google Scholar
- Barnett, L. A. (1991a). Characterizing playfulness: Correlates with individual attributes and personality traits. Play and Culture, 4, 371–393.Google Scholar
- Barnett, L. A. (1991b). The playful child: Measurement of a disposition to play. Play and Culture, 4, 51–74.Google Scholar
- Barnett, L. A. (2019). Profiles of playful men and playful women: Personality and humor-related attributes. American Journal of Play, 11, 308–350.Google Scholar
- Chick, G. (2001). What is play for? Sexual selection and the evolution of play. In S. Reifel (Ed.), Theory in context and out (Vol. 3, pp. 3–25). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishung.Google Scholar
- Chick, G., Proyer, R. T., Purrington, A., & Yarnal, C. (in press). Do birds of a playful feather flock together? Playfulness and assortative mating. American Journal of Play.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.Google Scholar
- Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P., & Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisungen. [Theoretical foundations and manuals]. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, N. J. (1967). Personality traits in adolescents: An investigation of playfulness–nonplayfulness in high school setting. Brooklyn Coll: City University of New York.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, N. J. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2007). Mplus. User manual. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
- Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and personality: On the validity of the Five-Factor model of personality]. Regensburg: Roderer.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T. (2012b). Examining playfulness in adults: Testing its correlates with personality, positive psychological functioning, goal aspirations, and multi-methodically assessed ingenuity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(2), 103–127.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Brauer, K., & Wolf, A. (2019a). Assessing other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical playfulness in adults: Development and initial validation of a short form of the OLIW using self- and peer-ratings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Brauer, K., Wolf, A., & Chick, G. (2018a). Beyond the ludic lover: Individual differences in self- and partner-rated playfulness and love styles in heterosexual relationships. American Journal of Play, 10, 265–289.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Tandler, N., & Brauer, K. (2019c). Playfulness and creativity: A selective review. In S. R. Luria, J. Baer, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity and humor (pp. 43–56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813802-1.00002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers, C. S., Impara, J. C., Frary, R. B., Harris, T., Meeks, A., Semanic-Lauth, S., et al. (1998). Measuring playfulness: Development of the child behavior inventory of playfulness. Play and Cultural Studies, 4, 121–135.Google Scholar
- Schäfer, M. & Korn, S. (2000). Fragebogen(II) zu den Mitschülerrollen beim Mobbing unter Schülern. Deutsche modifizierte Übersetzung des Participant Role Questionnaires von C. Salmivalli (Version, 2000). [German modified translation of the Participant Role Questionnaires] Retrieved from http://www.psy.lmu.de/mobbing/material/prq_5_6_klasse.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016.
- Schallberger, U., & Venetz, M. (1999). Kurzversionen des MRS-Inventars von Ostendorf (1990) zur Erfassung der fünf „grossen“Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [Short versions of the MRS Inventory by Ostendorf (1990) to assess the “big” five factors of personality]. Zürich: Department of Applied Psychology, Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
- Shen, X., Chick, G., & Pitas, N. A. (2017). From playful parents to adaptable children: a structural equation model of the relationships between playfulness and adaptability among young adults and their parents. International Journal of Play, 6, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2017.1382983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singer, J. L., Singer, D. G., & Sherrod, L. (1980). A factor analytic study of preschooler’s play behavior. American Psychological Bulletin, 2, 143–156.Google Scholar
- Sparfeldt, J. R., Buch, S. R., Rost, D. H., & Lehmann, G. (2008). Akkuratesse selbstberichteter Zensuren [Accuracy of self-reported grades]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 1, 68–75.Google Scholar
- Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Spinath, B., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Schöne, C., & Dickhäuser, O. (2002). Die Skalen zur Erfassung von Lern-und Leistungsmotivation (SELLMO) [Scales for the assessment of learning and performance motivation]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Tandler, N. & Proyer, R. T. (2018). Können verspielte angehende Erzieher/innen besser mit beruflichen Belastungen umgehen? [Are playful nursery teacher better at coping with job-related demands?] Poster presented at the 51. Congress of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar