The impact of teacher language on students’ mindsets and statistics performance

  • Tamarah Smith
  • Rasheeda Brumskill
  • Angela Johnson
  • Travon Zimmer
Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Studies have shown that performance feedback provided by teachers can communicate mindset messages to students and subsequently impact students’ performance. We sought to examine whether non-feedback related comments could also influence students’ mindsets and performance. We utilized a sample of undergraduate students enrolled in a research pool (n = 106) and compared their mindset and quiz scores after receiving a statistics lesson under one of three conditions. In two conditions the instructor introduced the lesson making comments that communicated either a fixed or growth mindset. A third condition served as a control. Students receiving growth comments moved towards growth mindset beliefs more so than those who received fixed mindset comments and had higher quiz scores when compared to the control group. These results provide early evidence that even non-feedback related comments can influence students’ mindsets and performance. We discuss implications for teaching, teacher training and future research.

Keywords

Motivation Intelligence Beliefs Teaching Achievement 

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98–101.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cumming, G. (2008). Replication and p intervals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 286–300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(7), 7–29.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai, T., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 233–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73–90.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000178836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dweck, C. S., Leggett, E. L., Cain, K., Clore, G., Erdley, C., Markman, E., et al. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Landivar, L. C. (2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and hispanic origin. American Community Survey Reports, 29, 911–922.Google Scholar
  11. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paunesku, D., Walton, G., Carissa, R., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. Retrieved from http://pss.sagepub.com/content/26/6/784.full.pdf.
  13. Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. (2012). It’s ok–not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rheinberg, F. (2000). Motivation (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  15. Shim, S. S., Cho, Y., & Cassady, J. (2013). Goal structures: The role of teachers’ achievement goals and theories of intelligence. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(1), 84–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.635168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, T. (2017). Reducing anxiety in the statistics classroom. In J. R. Stowell & W. E. Addison (Eds.), Activities for teaching statistics and research methods in psychology: A guide for instructors (pp. 1–9). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, T., & Smith, S. (2018). Reliability and validity of the research methods skills assessment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(1), 80–90.Google Scholar
  18. Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trouilloud, D. O., Sarrazin, P. G., Bressoux, P., & Bois, J. (2006). Relation between teachers’ early expectations and students’ later perceived competence in physical education classes: Autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, Q., & Ng, F. F. Y. (2012). Chinese students’ implicit theories of intelligence and school performance: Implications for their approach to schoolwork. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 930–935.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yeager, D. S., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., Brzustoski, P., Master, A., et al. (2013). Breaking the cycle of mistrust: Wise interventions to provide critical feedback across the racial divide. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 804–824.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., Brady, S. T., Akcinar, E. N., Paunesku, D., Keane, L., et al. (2016). Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524360113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCabrini UniversityRadnorUSA

Personalised recommendations