The Affective Modes of Right-Wing Populism: Trump Pedagogy and Lessons for Democratic Education
This paper argues that it is important for educators in democratic education to understand how the rise of right-wing populism in Europe, the United States and around the world can never be viewed apart from the affective investments of populist leaders and their supporters to essentialist ideological visions of nationalism, racism, sexism and xenophobia. Democratic education can provide the space for educators and students to think critically and productively about people’s affects, in order to identify the implications of different affective modes through which right-wing populism is articulated. Furthermore, this paper points out that ‘negative’ critique of the affective ideology of right-wing populism is not sufficient for developing a productive counter politics. An affirmative critique is also needed to set alternative frames and agendas which endorse and disseminate alternative concepts and affective practices such as equality, love and solidarity. These ideas provide critical resources to democratic education for developing a culture and process of democracy that transcends the negativity of mere critique of either right-wing populisms or inadequate forms of democracy.
KeywordsAffect Right-wing populism Trump Democratic education Pedagogy
- Ahmed, S. 2003. In the name of love. Borderlands 2(3). http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol2no3_2003/ahmed_love.htm.
- Ahmed, S. 2014. The cultural politics of emotion, 2nd ed. Edinburg, Scotland: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
- Anderson, B. 2017b. We will win again. We will win a lot.” The affective styles of Donald Trump. Society and Space, accessed online at https://societyandspace.org/2017/02/28/we-will-win-again-we-will-win-a-lot-the-affective-styles-of-donald-trump/. Accessed 9 Nov 2019.
- Bernstein, B. 2001. From pedagogies to knowledges. In Towards a sociology of pedagogy. The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research, ed. A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, and H. Daniels, 363–368. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Clarke, S., P. Hoggett, and S. Thompson (eds.). 2006. Emotion, politics and society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- CNN. 2016. Transcript of republican debate in Miami, full text, CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/10/politics/republican-debate-transcript-full-text/index.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.
- Damluji, H. 2019. The responsible globalist: What citizens of the world can learn from nationalism. London: Penguin Books Limited.Google Scholar
- De la Torre, C., and C.J. Arnson. 2013. Latin American populism in the twenty-first century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Demertzis, N. (ed.). 2013. Emotions in politics: The affect dimension in political tension. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, L.S. 2009. Teaching with love: A feminist approach to early childhood education. New York, NY: Peter Lang Pub.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, J., J. Jasper, and F. Polletta (eds.). 2001. Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Gould, D. 2012. Political despair. In Politics and the emotions: The affective turn in contemporary political studies, ed. P. Hoggett and S. Thompson, 95–111. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. 2016. Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
- Hodgson, N., J. Vlieghe, and P. Zamojski. 2017. Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy. In Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy, ed. N. Hodgson, J. Vlieghe, and P. Zamojski, 15–19. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
- Hoggett, P., and S. Thompson (eds.). 2012. Politics and the emotions: The affective turn in contemporary political studies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Loreman, T. 2010. Love as pedagogy. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Massumi, B. 2002. Navigating movements. In Hope: New philosophies for change, ed. M. Zournazi, 210–242. Annandale: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Massumi, B. 2015a. Politics of affect. London: Polity.Google Scholar
- Massumi, B. 2015b. Q & A with Brian Massumi, by Laura Sell. Duke University Press blog. https://dukeupress.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/qa-with-brian-massumi/. Accessed 9 Nov 2019.
- Miller, A. 1983. For your own good: Hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
- Mishra, P. 2017. Age of anger: A history of the present. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser (eds.). 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy?. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mühlhoff, R. 2019. Affective dispositions. In Affective societies-key concepts, ed. J. Slaby and C. von Scheve. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Panizza, F. (ed.). 2005. Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Pelinka, A. 2013. Right-wing populism: Concept and typology. In Right-wing populism in Europe politics and discourse, ed. R. Wodak, M. Khosravnik, and B. Mral, 3–22. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Peters, C. H., and J. Protevi. 2017. Affective ideology and Trump’s popularity. Unpublished paper. http://www.protevi.com/john/TrumpAffect.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2019.
- Seigworth, G.J., and M. Gregg (eds.). 2010. The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Trump, D. 1987. Trump: The art of the deal. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Trump, D. 2015. Crippled America: How to make America great again. New York: Threshold Editions.Google Scholar
- Zembylas, M. 2018b. Political emotions in the classroom: How affective citizenship education illuminates the debate between agonists and deliberators. Democracy & Education 26 (1): 1–5. Available at https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol26/iss1/6/.