Advertisement

The Affective Modes of Right-Wing Populism: Trump Pedagogy and Lessons for Democratic Education

  • Michalinos ZembylasEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper argues that it is important for educators in democratic education to understand how the rise of right-wing populism in Europe, the United States and around the world can never be viewed apart from the affective investments of populist leaders and their supporters to essentialist ideological visions of nationalism, racism, sexism and xenophobia. Democratic education can provide the space for educators and students to think critically and productively about people’s affects, in order to identify the implications of different affective modes through which right-wing populism is articulated. Furthermore, this paper points out that ‘negative’ critique of the affective ideology of right-wing populism is not sufficient for developing a productive counter politics. An affirmative critique is also needed to set alternative frames and agendas which endorse and disseminate alternative concepts and affective practices such as equality, love and solidarity. These ideas provide critical resources to democratic education for developing a culture and process of democracy that transcends the negativity of mere critique of either right-wing populisms or inadequate forms of democracy.

Keywords

Affect Right-wing populism Trump Democratic education Pedagogy 

Notes

References

  1. Ahmed, S. 2003. In the name of love. Borderlands 2(3). http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol2no3_2003/ahmed_love.htm.
  2. Ahmed, S. 2014. The cultural politics of emotion, 2nd ed. Edinburg, Scotland: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. 2017a. Hope and micropolitics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (4): 593–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. 2017b. We will win again. We will win a lot.” The affective styles of Donald Trump. Society and Space, accessed online at https://societyandspace.org/2017/02/28/we-will-win-again-we-will-win-a-lot-the-affective-styles-of-donald-trump/. Accessed 9 Nov 2019.
  5. Baldacchino, J.-P. 2011. The eidetic of belonging: Towards a phenomenological psychology of affect and ethno-national identity. Ethnicities 11 (1): 80–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein, B. 2001. From pedagogies to knowledges. In Towards a sociology of pedagogy. The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research, ed. A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, and H. Daniels, 363–368. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, S., P. Hoggett, and S. Thompson (eds.). 2006. Emotion, politics and society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Clough, P. 2007. Introduction. In The affective turn: Theorizing the social, ed. P. Clough and J. Halley, 1–33. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CNN. 2016. Transcript of republican debate in Miami, full text, CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/10/politics/republican-debate-transcript-full-text/index.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2016.
  12. Damluji, H. 2019. The responsible globalist: What citizens of the world can learn from nationalism. London: Penguin Books Limited.Google Scholar
  13. De la Torre, C., and C.J. Arnson. 2013. Latin American populism in the twenty-first century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Demertzis, N. (ed.). 2013. Emotions in politics: The affect dimension in political tension. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Freeden, M. 2017. After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giroux, H. 2019. Authoritarianism and the challenge of higher education in the age of Trump. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education 18 (1): 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glynos, J. 2001. The grip of ideology: A Lacanian approach to the theory of ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 6 (2): 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein, L.S. 2009. Teaching with love: A feminist approach to early childhood education. New York, NY: Peter Lang Pub.Google Scholar
  20. Goodwin, J., J. Jasper, and F. Polletta (eds.). 2001. Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, D. 2012. Political despair. In Politics and the emotions: The affective turn in contemporary political studies, ed. P. Hoggett and S. Thompson, 95–111. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  22. Hochschild, A. 2016. Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hodgson, N., J. Vlieghe, and P. Zamojski. 2017. Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy. In Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy, ed. N. Hodgson, J. Vlieghe, and P. Zamojski, 15–19. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  24. Hoggett, P., and S. Thompson (eds.). 2012. Politics and the emotions: The affective turn in contemporary political studies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. Kemmer, L., C.H. Peters, V. Weber, B. Anderson, and R. Mühlhoff. 2019. On right-wing movements, spheres, and resonances: An interview with Ben Anderson and Rainer Mühlhoff. Distinktion. Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinnvall, C. 2018. Ontological insecurities and postcolonial imaginaries: The emotional appeal of populism. Humanity & Society 42 (4): 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kølvraa, C., and J. Ifversen. 2017. The attraction of ideology: discourse, desire and the body. Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (2): 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krauel, J. 2014. Emotions and nationalism: The case of Joan Maragall’s compassionate love of country. Hispanic Research Journal 15 (3): 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Loreman, T. 2010. Love as pedagogy. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Lyman, P. 2004. The domestication of anger: The use and abuse of anger in politics. European Journal of Social Theory 7 (2): 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mårdh, A., and A. Tryggvason. 2017. Democratic education in the mode of populism. Studies in Philosophy and Education 36: 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin, J.L., A.E. Nickels, and M. Sharp-Grier. 2017. Editors’ introduction. In Feminist pedagogy, practice, and activism: Improving lives for girls and women, ed. J.L. Martin, A.E. Nickels, and M. Sharp-Grier, 10–15. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massumi, B. 2002. Navigating movements. In Hope: New philosophies for change, ed. M. Zournazi, 210–242. Annandale: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  35. Massumi, B. 2015a. Politics of affect. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  36. Massumi, B. 2015b. Q & A with Brian Massumi, by Laura Sell. Duke University Press blog. https://dukeupress.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/qa-with-brian-massumi/. Accessed 9 Nov 2019.
  37. Miller, A. 1983. For your own good: Hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
  38. Mishra, P. 2017. Age of anger: A history of the present. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser (eds.). 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy?. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mühlhoff, R. 2019. Affective dispositions. In Affective societies-key concepts, ed. J. Slaby and C. von Scheve. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is populism?. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Panizza, F. (ed.). 2005. Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  45. Pelinka, A. 2013. Right-wing populism: Concept and typology. In Right-wing populism in Europe politics and discourse, ed. R. Wodak, M. Khosravnik, and B. Mral, 3–22. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  46. Peters, C. H., and J. Protevi. 2017. Affective ideology and Trump’s popularity. Unpublished paper. http://www.protevi.com/john/TrumpAffect.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2019.
  47. Petrie, M., C. McGregor, and J. Crowther. 2019. Populism, democracy and a pedagogy of renewal. International Journal of Lifelong Learning.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2019.1617798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rebughini, P. 2018. Critical agency and the future of critique. Current Sociology 66 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ringrose, J. 2018. Digital feminist pedagogy and post-truth misogyny. Teaching in Higher Education 23 (5): 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmela, M., and C. von Scheve. 2017. Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information 56 (4): 567–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salmela, M., and C. von Scheve. 2018. Emotional dynamics of right- and left-wing political populism. Humanity & Society 42 (4): 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheper-Hughes, N. 2014. The militarization and madness of everyday life. South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (3): 640–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seigworth, G.J., and M. Gregg (eds.). 2010. The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Staunæs, D. 2016. Notes on inventive methodologies and affirmative critiques of an affective edu-future. Research in Education 96 (1): 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trump, D. 1987. Trump: The art of the deal. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  56. Trump, D. 2015. Crippled America: How to make America great again. New York: Threshold Editions.Google Scholar
  57. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. 2018. Media coverage of shifting emotional regimes: Donald Trump’s angry populism. Media, Culture and Society 40 (5): 766–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wodak, R. 2015. The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zembylas, M. 2017. Love as ethico-political practice: Inventing reparative pedagogies of aimance in “disjointed” times. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy 14 (1): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zembylas, M. 2018a. Affect, race, and white discomfort in schooling: Decolonial strategies for ‘pedagogies of discomfort’. Ethics and Education 13 (1): 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zembylas, M. 2018b. Political emotions in the classroom: How affective citizenship education illuminates the debate between agonists and deliberators. Democracy & Education 26 (1): 1–5. Available at https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol26/iss1/6/.
  62. Zembylas, M. 2019a. The affective dimension of far right rhetoric in the classroom: The promise of agonistic emotions and affects in countering extremism. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1613959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zembylas, M. 2019b. Re-conceptualizing complicity in the social justice classroom: Affect, politics and anti-complicity pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1639792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open University of CyprusLatsiaCyprus
  2. 2.Nelson Mandela University (NMU)Port ElizabethSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations