Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 657–668 | Cite as

What Kind of Society Does the School Need? Redefining the Democratic Work of Education in Impatient Times

  • Gert BiestaEmail author
Article

Abstract

In many places around the world the modern school is under a relentless pressure to perform and the standards for such performance are increasingly being set by the global education measurement industry. All this puts a pressure on schools, teachers and students but also on policy makers and politicians, who all seem to have been caught up in a global educational rat-race. There is a discourse of panic about educational quality, which seems to drive an insatiable need for improvement, geared towards ever narrower definitions of what counts as education and what counts in education. The surprising result is that the modern school is increasingly seen as a problem, with high levels of dissatisfaction amongst teachers, students, politicians, the media and the public at large, who all want something better from the school, although they disagree about what this may look like. The question this raises is whether it is time to give up on the modern schools and its promise and hand it over to Pearson, Google and other educational capitalists, or whether we should try again and, if so, where we might go. The reflections I offer in this paper are primarily meant to think again about the relationship between the school and society, arguing for a more ‘obstinate’ school and a more ‘patient’ society. I argue that whether such a recalibration of the relationship between school and society is possible, is ultimately a test of the democratic quality of society itself.

Keywords

The modern school The welfare state Democracy Quality Performativity The impulse society 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Christoph Teschers for alerting me to the brilliant question posed by Eckart Liebau, which forms the main title of this paper and also a major point of inspiration.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1977. Between past and future: Eight exercises in political though. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, Stephen. 2003. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, Gert. 2009. Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta, Gert. 2010. Why ‘what works’ still won’t work. From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 29: 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesta, Gert. 2013. Interrupting the politics of learning. Power and Education 5: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biesta, Gert. 2014. You can’t always get what you want: An an-archic view on education democracy and civic learning. In Museums: Knowledge, democracy, transformation, ed. Braendholt Lundegaard Ida and Thorek Jensen Jacob, 110–119. Copenhagen: Danish Agency for Culture.Google Scholar
  7. Biesta, Gert. 2015a. Resisting the seduction of the global education measurement industry: Motes on the social psychology of PISA. Ethics and Education 10: 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesta, Gert. 2015b. Freeing teaching from learning: Opening up existential possibilities in educational relationships. Studies in Philosophy and Education 34: 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biesta, Gert. 2017. The rediscovery of teaching. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biesta, Gert. 2019a. Obstinate education: Reconnecting school and society. Leiden: Brill, Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biesta, Gert. 2019b. Should teaching be re(dis)covered? Introduction to a symposium. Studies in Philosophy and Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09667-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biesta, Gert. In press. Perfect education, but not for everyone: On society’s need for inequality and the rise of surrogate education. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik.Google Scholar
  13. Böhm, Winfried. 1995. Theorie und Praxis: Eine Einführung in das pädagogische Grundproblem. [Theory and praxis: An introduction to the fundamental problem of education.]. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  14. D’Agnese, Vasco. 2017. Reclaiming education in an age of PISA. Challenging OECD’s educational order. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eagle, Lynne, and Ross Brennan. 2007. Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education 15: 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleeson, Denis Gleeson, and Chris Husbands (eds.). 2001. The performing school: Managing, teaching and learning in a performance culture. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  17. Hopmann, Stefan. 2008. No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies 40: 417–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jansen, Jonathan. 1998. Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge journal of education 28: 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liebau, Eckart. 1999. Erfahrung und Verantwortung. Werteerziehung als Pädagogik der Teilhabe. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Masschelein, Jan, and Maarten Simons. 2012. Apologie van de school: Een publieke zaak. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  22. Meirieu, Philippe. 2007. Pédagogie: Le devoir de résister. [Education: The duty to resist.] Issy-les-Moulineaux: ESF Éditeur.Google Scholar
  23. Mollenhauer, Klaus. 1973. Erziehung und Emanzipation. Education and Emancipation, 6th ed. München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  24. Mollenhauer, Klaus. 2013. Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nixon, Elizabeth, Richard Scullion, and Robert Hearn. 2018. Her majesty the student: Marketised higher education and the narcissistic (dis)satisfactions of the student-consumer. Studies in Higher Education 43: 927–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The social system. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ravitch, Dianne. 2011. The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, Paul. 2014. The impulse society. What is wrong with getting what we want?. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  29. Spady, William. 1994. Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Public Education and PedagogyMaynooth UniversityMaynooth, Co. KildareIreland

Personalised recommendations