Advertisement

Ordinary life and the tragedy of solidarity

  • Piotr KostyłoEmail author
Article

Abstract

In his texts, Józef Tischner (1930–2000) referred to significant problems characteristic of the end of the communist regime and the first years of the liberal-democratic system in Poland. He tried to understand, among other things, the sources of Polish society’s disappointment with their regained political and economic freedom. This article discusses the late period of Tischner’s life and work, when his philosophy was heavily influenced by the ideas of Charles Taylor. On the one hand, the author analyzes Tischner’s attitude toward the concept of ordinary life, while on the other, Tischner’s understanding of solidarity combined with the concept of the spirit of capitalism. The article shows numerous similarities and significant differences between the way of thinking of both philosophers. The former concern above all the consentaneous assessment of the disappearance of heroism in liberal-democratic societies, while the latter concern the discrepancies in the assessment of the possibility of fully implementing the idea of solidarity in these societies.

Keywords

Ordinary life Heroism Solidarity Capitalism Post-communism 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by a Kazimierz Wielki University internal grant.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ackerman, B. (1992). The future of liberal revolution. New Heaven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). Lectures on the philosophy of history. Kitchener: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
  3. Kwieciński, Z. (1992). Socjopatologia edukacji. [The sociopatology of education]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo “Edytor”.Google Scholar
  4. Taylor, C. H. (1989). The sources of the self. The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Taylor, C. H. (2000). Kilka refleksji o solidarności. [Several reflections on the theme of solidarity]. Znak,543(8), 22–34.Google Scholar
  6. Tischner, J. (1993a). Nieszczęsny dar wolności. [The infelicitous gift of freedom]. Kraków: Znak.Google Scholar
  7. Tischner, J. (1993b). Spowiedź rewolucjonisty. [The revolutionary’s confession]. Kraków: Znak.Google Scholar
  8. Tischner, J. (1998). Kwaśne winogrona i chytry rozum. [Sour grapes and the cunning of reason]. Znak,519(8), 34–41.Google Scholar
  9. Tischner, J. (1999). Ksiądz na manowcach. [A priest astray]. Kraków: Znak.Google Scholar
  10. Weigel, G. (1992). The final revolution. The resistance church and the collapse of communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Wieczorek, K. (2018). Przestrzenie wolności. Między heroizmem a konformizmem. Paedagogia Christiana,44(3), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kazimierz Wielki UniversityBydgoszczPoland

Personalised recommendations