Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Perceived Unfairness and Psychological Distress: Less Harmful as Age Increases?

  • Min-Ah LeeEmail author
  • Ichiro Kawachi
Article

Abstract

Does perceived unfairness influence psychological well-being differently according to age? We sought to examine the association between perceived unfairness and psychological distress, testing whether and how age moderates the association. Data were drawn from the Korean General Social Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional sample, collected in 2 years (2011, 2012). The survey measured two types of perceived unfairness: distributive and procedural unfairness. We found that both types of perceived unfairness were positively and independently associated with psychological distress. Our results also showed effect modification by age; in other words, the harmful effects of perceived distributive and procedural unfairness on psychological distress decreased with age, suggesting that younger people were more distressed by perceived unfairness than older people. Our findings suggest that perceived unfairness is harmful to psychological well-being, but its effects become less salient as people age.

Keywords

Perceived unfairness Distributive unfairness Procedural unfairness Psychological distress Age 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ayalon, L., & Gum, A. M. (2011). The relationships between major lifetime discrimination, everyday discrimination and mental health in three racial and ethnic groups of older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 15(5), 587–594.Google Scholar
  2. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., & Van Der Velde, M. E. G. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 143–158.Google Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2016). Justice sensitivity. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 161–180). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard-Fields, F., Jahnke, H. C., & Camp, C. (1995). Age differences in problem-solving style: The role of emotional salience. Psychology and Aging, 10(2), 173–180.Google Scholar
  6. Bobocel, D. R., & Gosse, L. (2015). Procedural justice: A historical review and critical analysis. In R. Cropanzano & M. Ambrose (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 51–87). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bosma, H., Gerritsma, A., Klanners, G., & van den Akker, M. (2012). Perceived unfairness and socioeconomic inequalities in functional decline: The Dutch SMILE prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 12, 818.Google Scholar
  8. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.Google Scholar
  9. Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103–123.Google Scholar
  10. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.Google Scholar
  11. Clay-Warner, J., Hegtvedt, K. A., & Roman, P. (2005). Procedural justice, distributive justice: How experiences with downsizing condition their impact on organizational commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 89–102.Google Scholar
  12. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. R., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110–127.Google Scholar
  13. Cornelis, I. Van, Hiel, A., Roets, A., & Kossowska, M. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: Evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 53–88.Google Scholar
  14. De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, B., van Knippenberg, D., & Mullenders, D. (2005). Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
  15. De Vogli, R., Brunner, E., & Marmot, M. G. (2007a). Unfairness and the social gradient of metabolic syndrome in the Whitehall II study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63, 413–419.Google Scholar
  16. De Vogli, R., Ferrie, J. E., Chandola, T., Kivimäki, M., & Marmot, M. G. (2007b). Unfairness and health: Evidence from the Whitehall II study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 513–518.Google Scholar
  17. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: New York Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
  19. Ferraro, K. F., & Shippee, T. P. (2009). Aging and cumulative inequality: How does inequality get under the skin? The Gerontologist, 49(3), 333–343.Google Scholar
  20. Ferraro, K. F., Shippee, T. P., & Schafer, M. H. (2009). Cumulative inequality theory for research on aging and the life course. In V. L. Bengtson, M. Silverstein, N. M. Putney, & D. Gans (Eds.), The handbook of theories of aging (pp. 413–433). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Ford, M. T. (2014). Perceived unfairness at work, social and personal resources, and resting blood pressure. Stress & Health, 30, 12–22.Google Scholar
  22. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.Google Scholar
  23. Grant, M. J., Ross, A. S., Button, C. M., Hannah, T. E., & Hoskins, R. (2001). Attitudes and stereotypes about attitudes across the lifespan. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 749–762.Google Scholar
  24. Ha, S. E., & Kim, S. (2013). Personality and subjective well-being: Evidence from South Korea. Social Indicator Research, 111, 341–359.Google Scholar
  25. Jorm, A. F., Windsor, T. D., Dear, K. B. G., Anstey, K. J., Christensen, H., & Rodgers, B. (2005). Age group differences in psychological distress: The roles of psychological risk factors that vary with age. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1253–1263.Google Scholar
  26. Kang, J., Kim, J., & Lee, M. A. (2016). Marital status and mortality: Does family structure in childhood matter? Social Science and Medicine, 159, 152–160.Google Scholar
  27. Kawachi, I. (2000). Income inequality and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 76–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kessler, R. C., Birnbaum, H., Bromet, E., Hwang, I., Sampson, N., & Shahly, V. (2010). Age differences in major depression: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Psychological Medicine, 40, 225–237.Google Scholar
  29. Kessler, R. C., Mickelson, K. D., & Williams, D. R. (1999). The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(3), 208–230.Google Scholar
  30. Kim, S., Kim, J., Moon, Y., & Shin, S. (2013). Korean General Social Survey, 2012. Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University Press. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  31. Lacey, H. P., Smith, D. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). Hope I die before I get old: Mispredicting happiness across the adult lifespan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 167–182.Google Scholar
  32. Löckenhoff, C., & Cartensen, L. L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making touch choices. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1397–1424.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, T. (2009). Justifying outcomes versus processes: Distributive and procedural justice beliefs as predictors of positive and negative affectivity. Current Psychology, 28, 249–265.Google Scholar
  34. Lucas, T., Zhdanova, L., Wendorf, C. A., & Alexander, S. (2013). Procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others: Multilevel associations with life satisfaction and self-rated health. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1325–1341.Google Scholar
  35. Marmot, M. (2004). Dignity and inequality. Lancet, 364, 1019–1021.Google Scholar
  36. Masterson, S. S., & Tong, N. (2015). Justice perception formation in social setting. In R. Cropanzano & M. Ambrose (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 291–308). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1992). Age and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(3), 187–205.Google Scholar
  38. Mishra, S., & Carleton, R. N. (2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science and Medicine, 147, 144–149.Google Scholar
  39. Montada, L., & Maes, J. (2016). Justice and self-interest. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 109–128). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Nguyen, H. T., & Zonderman, A. B. (2006). Relationship between age and aspects of depression: Consistency and reliability across two longitudinal studies. Psychology and Aging, 21, 119–126.Google Scholar
  41. OECD. (2013). Pension at glance. 2013: OECD and G20 indicators. http://www.oecd.org/pensions/public-pensions/OECDPensionsAtAGlance2013.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2017.
  42. Robbins, J. M., Ford, M. T., & Tetrick, L. E. (2012). Perceived unfairness and employee health: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 235–272.Google Scholar
  43. Rousseau, V., Salek, S., Aubé, C., & Morin, E. M. (2009). Distributive justice, procedural justice, and psychological distress: The moderating effect of coworker support and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(3), 305–317.Google Scholar
  44. Sabbagh, C., & Schmitt, M. (2016). Past, present, and future of social justice theory and research. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 1–11). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211–238.Google Scholar
  46. Schmitt, M., & Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443–453.Google Scholar
  47. Schulte-Braucks, J., Baethge, A., Dormann, C., & Vahle-Hinz, T. (2018). Get even and feel good? Moderating effects of justice sensitivity and counterproductive work behavior on the relationships between illegitimate tasks and self-esteem. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000112. (Advance online publication).Google Scholar
  48. Siegrist, J. (2015). Justice and health. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 928–931). Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
  49. Spiers, N., Brugha, T., Bebbington, P., McManusa, S., Jenkins, R., & Meltzer, H. (2012). Age and birth cohort differences in depression in repeated cross-sectional surveys in England: The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys, 1993-2007. Psychological Medicine, 42(1), 2047–2055.Google Scholar
  50. Statistics Korea. (2016). Consumer price index. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1J0A001&conn_path=l2#. Accessed June 25, 2017.
  51. Stordal, E., Mykletun, A., & Dahl, A. A. (2003). The association between age and depression in the general population: A multivariate examination. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 107, 132–141.Google Scholar
  52. Sullivan, M. J. L., Yakobov, E., Scott, W., & Tait, R. (2014). Perceived injustice and adverse recovery outcomes. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(4), 325–334.Google Scholar
  53. Tabuchi, T., Fukuhara, H., & Iso, H. (2012). Geographically-based discrimination is a social determinant of mental health in a deprived or stigmatized area in Japan: A cross-sectional study. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1015–1021.Google Scholar
  54. Törnblom, K., & Kazemi, A. (2015). Distributive justice: Revisiting past statements and reflecting on future prospects. In R. Cropanzano & M. Ambrose (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 15–50). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Twenge, J. M. (2014). Time period and birth cohort differences in depressive symptoms in the U.S., 1982-2013. Social Indicators Research, 121, 437–454.Google Scholar
  56. Wallace, S., Nazroo, J., & Bécares, L. (2016). Cumulative effect of racial discrimination on the mental health of ethnic minorities in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Public Health, 106(7), 1294–1300.Google Scholar
  57. Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2016). Retributive justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 237–256). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Wilkinson, R. G. (2005). The impact of inequality: How to make sick societies healthier. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2007). The problem of relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than others. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 1965–1978.Google Scholar
  60. You, J. (2012). Social trust: Fairness matters more than homogeneity. Political Psychology, 33(5), 701–721.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyChung-Ang UniveristySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Social and Behavioral SciencesHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations