Advertisement

Money and Happiness: Income, Wealth and Subjective Well-Being

  • Conchita D’AmbrosioEmail author
  • Markus Jäntti
  • Anthony Lepinteur
Article

Abstract

We examine the complex relationship between money and happiness. We find that both permanent income and wealth are better predictors of life satisfaction than current income and wealth. They matter not only in absolute terms but also in comparative terms. However, their relative impacts differ. The first exerts a comparison effect—the higher the permanent income of the reference group, the lower life satisfaction—the second exerts an information effect—the higher the permanent wealth of the reference group, the higher life satisfaction. We also show that negative transitory shocks to income reduce life satisfaction while transitory shocks to wealth have no effect. Lastly, we analyse the effects of their components and find that not all of them predict life satisfaction: permanent taxes do not matter, while only the value of permanent real estate, financial and business assets do. Finally, we use quantile regression and analyse to what extent our results vary along the well-being distribution, finding the impacts to be larger at lower levels of life satisfaction.

Keywords

Permanent income Permanent wealth Life satisfaction SOEP 

JEL Classification

I30 D60 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Andrew Clark for useful comments and thank the editor, Filomena Maggino, and two anonymous referees for very useful suggestions. D’Ambrosio and Lepinteur gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg. Some of the ideas of this paper were discussed by D’Ambrosio and Jäntti with Joachim R. Frick in 2008 during their time at DIW Berlin and appeared in D'Ambrosio et al. (2009). Joachim is still greatly missed. This work was funded by Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (Grant Nos. FNR/P11/05 & FNR/P11/05BIS & FNR/P12/06).

Supplementary material

11205_2019_2186_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2015). Heterogeneity in the relationship between unemployment and subjective well-being: A quantile approach. Economica, 82, 865–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., Banks, J., Clark, A. E., & Brown, G. D. (2013). Money, well-being, and loss aversion: Does an income loss have a greater effect on well-being than an equivalent income gain? Psychological Science, 24, 2557–2562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S., & Gray, D. (2016). Household finances and well-being in Australia: An empirical analysis of comparison effects. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, S., Taylor, K., & Price, S. W. (2005). Debt and distress: Evaluating the psychological cost of credit. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 642–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, A. E. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic literature, 46, 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., Westergård-Nielsen, N., & Kristensen, N. (2009). Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Ambrosio, C., & Frick, J. R. (2011). Individual well-being in a dynamic perspective. Economica, 79, 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D'Ambrosio, C., Frick, J. R., & Jantti, M. (2009). Satisfaction with life and economic well-being: Evidence from Germany. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 129, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Neve, J. E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2013. Amsterdam: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, R. B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. American Economic Review, 68, 135–141.Google Scholar
  14. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Melin, R., & Fugl-Meyer, K. S. (2002). Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic Record, 80, S24–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirschman, A. O. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keese, M., & Schmitz, H. (2014). Broke, ill, and obese: Is there an effect of household debt on health? Review of Income and Wealth, 60, 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right. International Differences in Well-Being, 28, 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luttmer, E. F. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.Google Scholar
  20. Lyubomirsky, S. (2010). Hedonic adaptation to positive and negative experiences. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on stress, health and coping (pp. 200–224). Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press.Google Scholar
  21. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mullis, R. J. (1992). Measures of economic well-being as predictors of psychological well-being. Social Indicators Research, 26, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Senik, C. (2004). When information dominates comparison: Learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2099–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LuxembourgEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  2. 2.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations