Advertisement

Is Linking Social Capital More Beneficial to the Health Promotion of the Poor? Evidence from China

Abstract

As a more recently developed dimension of social capital, linking social capital seems to be less frequently discussed in the field of public health. Following the classic definition of linking social capital proposed by Szreter and Woolcock (Int J Epidemiol 33(4):650–667, 2004), this study defined linking social capital from the perspective of political capital. Political trust, political efficacy, political participation and membership in the Chinese Communist Party were used to measure linking social capital. Based on the data from Chinese General Social Survey of 2010 (N = 3209), this study used extended regression model to address potential endogenous problems of linking social capital and estimate its disparities in health return by the level of family income. Results show that only certain associations between linking social capital and psychological health were observed without endogenous problems addressed, and no significant family income disparity in these associations was observed. However, with endogenous problems addressed, it was observed that linking social capital was more beneficial to the health promotion, including both physical and psychological health, of the poor. These results are intrinsically in line with the classic definition of linking social capital, and they also indirectly support the applicability of this classic definition in unique Chinese settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Notes

  1. 1.

    As the half of the average household income in 2010 was about 23,000 CNY/year, individuals with total family incomes of less than 23,000 CNY/year were treated as the poor. Since (46,309.93 − 23,155 = 23,155 ≈ 23,000) CNY/year was treated as the floor of middle family income, (46,309.93 + 23,155 = 69,465 ≈ 69,000) CNY/year was considered as the ceiling of middle family income. Thus, individuals with total family incomes of 23,000–68,999 CNY/year were classified as the middle-income group, and individuals with total family incomes of no less than 69,000 CNY/year were considered as the rich.

  2. 2.

    Sense of income fairness was used as the IV of political trust and political efficacy, collective action at the individual and province levels were used as IVs of political participation, and father’s political status was used as the IV of membership in CCP. Usually, higher levels of political trust and efficacy are closely related to confidence in the government. Therefore, individuals with higher levels of political trust and efficacy usually agree that the government is trustworthy, so they are commonly satisfied with the income distribution system designed by the government. However, sense of income fairness is usually not associated with health outcomes. Second, “whether there is collective action around you” is a strong predictor of political activities and the management level in one place, so it is highly related to individuals’ political participation, and it is exogenous and not determined by individuals, it only influences individuals’ health through their participation. Further, father’s political status is a strong predictor of the political status of children, and it is not directly related to children’ health. In most instances, although these IVs were valid, they were not always perfect. For example, membership in CCP was not endogenous when father’s political status was used to examine the association between membership in CCP and psychological health (when father’s political status was used as the IV). Even so, evidence shows that even a flawed IV is still meaningful and can yield significant supplements (Morgan 2002).

References

  1. Aldrich, D. P., & Ono, Y. (2016). Local politicians as linking social capital: An empirical test of political behavior after Japan’s 3/11 disasters. Natural Hazards,84(3), 1637–1659.

  2. Barker, J., & Thomson, L. (2015). Helpful relationships with service users: Linking social capital. Australian Social Work,68(1), 130–145.

  3. Beck, U. (1986). Risk: Towards a new modernity. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

  4. Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review,62(3), 366–385.

  5. Blakely, T. A., Lochner, K., & Kawachi, I. (2001). Metropolitan area income inequality and self-rated health. Social Science and Medicine,54, 65–77.

  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. New York: Greenwood Press.

  7. Cai, Y. (2017). Bonding, bridging, and linking: Photovoice for resilience through social capital. Natural Hazards,88(2), 1169–1195.

  8. Chen, F. (2009). Stronger marketization, weaker participation? A study of pathway to civil society. Sociological Studies, 24(3), 89–111.

  9. Chen, G. (2010). Market or non-market? An empirical analysis of the main causes of income inequalities in China today. Sociological Studies, 25(6), 86–115.

  10. Chen, H., & Meng, T. (2015). Bonding, bridging, and linking social capital and self-rated health among Chinese adults: Use of the anchoring vignettes technique. PLoS ONE,10(11), e0142300.

  11. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology,94, 95–120.

  12. Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2017). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research,132(2), 537–558.

  13. Ferlander, S. (2007). The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociologica,50(2), 115–128.

  14. Glanville, J. L., & Story, W. T. (2018). Social capital and self-rated health: Clarifying the role of trust. Social Science Research,71, 98–108.

  15. He, Z. (2015). Impact of human capital, political capital, social capital on income inequality. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),17(4), 42–47.

  16. Hu, Z., Liu, Z., & Gong, Z. (2011). Estimation of the Gini coefficient in China: 1985–2008. China Economic Quarterly,10(4), 1423–1436.

  17. Ichida, Y., Hirai, H., Kondo, K., Kawachi, I., Takeda, T., & Endo, H. (2013). Does social participation improve self-rated health in the older population? A quasi-experimental intervention study. Social Science and Medicine,94, 83–90.

  18. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Glass, R. (1999). Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health,89(8), 1187–1193.

  19. Kawachi, I., Takao, S., & Subramanian, S. V. (2013). Global perspectives on social capital and health. New York: Springer.

  20. Kim, D., Subramanian, S. V., & Kawachi, I. (2006). Bonding versus bridging social capital and their associations with self rated health: a multilevel analysis of 40 US communities. Epidemiology & Community Health,60(2), 116–122.

  21. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  22. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage.

  23. Liu, G. G., Xue, X., Yu, C., & Wang, Y. (2016). How does social capital matter to the health status of older adults? Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey. Economics and Human Biology,22, 177–189.

  24. Marmot, M. (2002). The influence of income on health: Views of an epidemiologist. Health Affairs,21(2), 31–46.

  25. Meijer, M., & Syssner, J. (2017). Getting ahead in depopulating areas—How linking social capital is used for informal planning practices in Sweden and The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies,55, 59–70.

  26. Meng, T., & Chen, H. (2014). A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-rated health: Evidence from China. Health & Place,27, 38–44.

  27. Moore, S., & Kawachi, I. (2017). Twenty years of social capital and health research: A glossary. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,71(5), 513–517.

  28. Morgan, S. L. (2002). Should sociologists use instrumental variables? Cornell University. Working paper.

  29. Murayama, H., Wakui, T., Arami, R., Sugawara, I., & Yoshie, S. (2012). Contextual effect of different components of social capital on health in a suburban city of the greater Tokyo area: A multilevel analysis. Social Science and Medicine,75(12), 2472–2480.

  30. Ng, R. M. (2000). The influence of Confucianism on Chinese conceptions of power, authority, and the rule of law. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

  31. Norstrand, J. A., & Xu, Q. (2012). Social capital and health outcomes among older adults in China: The urban–rural dimension. The Gerontologist,52(3), 325–334.

  32. Nyqvist, F., Pape, B., Pellfolk, T., Forsman, A. K., & Wahlbeck, K. (2014). Structural and cognitive aspects of social capital and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Social Indicators Research,116(2), 545–566.

  33. Oshio, T. (2016). The association between individual-level social capital and health: cross-sectional, prospective cohort and fixed-effects models. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,70(1), 25–30.

  34. Poortinga, W. (2006). Social relations or social capital? Individual and community health effects of bonding social capital. Social Science and Medicine,63(1), 255–270.

  35. Poortinga, W. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health & Place,18(2), 286–295.

  36. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s decline in social capital. Journal of Democracy,6, 65–78.

  37. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon Schuster.

  38. Qi, Y. (2014). Reliability and validity of self-rated general health. Chinese Journal of Sociology,34(6), 196–215.

  39. Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2006). Sex differences in the effect of education on depression: Resource multiplication or resource substitution? Social Science and Medicine,63(5), 1400–1413.

  40. Rubin, O. (2016). The political dimension of “linking social capital”: Current analytical practices and the case for recalibration. Theory and Society,45(5), 429–449.

  41. Schultz, J., O’Brien, M. A., & Tadesse, B. (2008). Social capital and self-rated health: Results from the US 2006 social capital survey of one community. Social Science and Medicine,67(4), 606–617.

  42. Stata. (2017). https://www.stata.com/new-in-stata/extended-regression-models/. Retrieved 6 June 2017.

  43. StataCorp. (2017). Stata extended regression models reference manual: Release 15.

  44. Sun, X. (2011). Village governance and kinship in south China: A functionalism analysis. Sociological Studies, 26(1), 133–166.

  45. Sundquist, J., Johansson, S.-E., Yang, M., & Sundquist, K. (2006). Low linking social capital as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Sweden: A cohort study of 2.8 million people. Social Science and Medicine,62(4), 954–963.

  46. Sundquist, K., Hamano, T., Li, X., Kawakami, N., Shiwaku, K., & Sundquist, J. (2014). Linking social capital and mortality in the elderly: A Swedish national cohort study. Experimental Gerontology,55(1), 29–36.

  47. Sundquist, K., & Yang, M. (2007). Linking social capital and self-rated health: A multilevel analysis of 11175 men and women in Sweden. Health & Place,13(2), 324–334.

  48. Szreter, S. (2002). The state of social capital: Bringing back in power, politics, and history. Theory and Society,31(5), 573–621.

  49. Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology,33(4), 650–667.

  50. Vincens, N., Emmelin, M., & Stafström, M. (2018). Social capital, income inequality and the social gradient in self-rated health in Latin America: A fixed effects analysis. Social Science and Medicine,196, 115–122.

  51. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society,27(2), 151–208.

  52. Woolcock, M. (2010). The rise and routinization of social capital, 1988–2008. Annual Review of Political Science,13, 469–487.

  53. Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer,15(2), 225–249.

  54. Xiao, T. (2006). Who is the village head? A preliminary analysis of social and political capital of village cadres. Management World, 22(9), 64–70.

  55. Yang, G. (2007). Puritanism and the formation of American political culture. (Doctor), China University of Political Science and Law, Beijiang.

  56. Younsi, M., & Chakroun, M. (2017). Does social capital determine health? Empirical evidence from MENA countries. Social Science Journal,54(2), 238–247.

  57. Zarychta, A. (2015). Community trust and household health: A spatially-based approach with evidence from rural Honduras. Social Science and Medicine,146, 85–94.

  58. Zhai, X. (2005). Face, favor and reproduction of power. Beijing: Peking University Press.

  59. Zhang, Y., & Jiang, J. (2019). Social capital and health in China: Evidence from the Chinese General Social Survey 2010. Social Indicators Research,142(1), 411–430.

  60. Zhao, Q., & Jin, J. (2010). Research on the public’s behavior selection model of “social mobility-political participation”. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University,29(2), 17–21.

  61. Zhou, G., Fan, G., & Shen, G. (2014). The income disparity, the social capital and health: A case study based on China Family Panel Studies. Management World, 30(7), 12–21.

  62. Zhou, Y. (2012). Is social capital the capital of the poor? Empirical evidence from the income of rural residents in China. Management World, 28(7), 83–95.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding was provided by Wuhan University Population and Health Young Academic Team (Grant No. Whu2016026).

Author information

Correspondence to Peigang Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 8.

Table 8 Rotated component matrix of linking social capital

Appendix 2

See Table 9.

Table 9 Rotated component matrix of two health outcomes

Appendix 3

See Tables 10, 11, 12 and 13.

Table 10 Hausman test for endogeneity of political trust
Table 11 Hausman test for endogeneity of political efficacy
Table 12 Hausman test for endogeneity of political participation
Table 13 Hausman test for endogeneity of CCP membership

Appendix 4

See Table 14.

Table 14 Weak IV test for IVs used

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Wang, P. Is Linking Social Capital More Beneficial to the Health Promotion of the Poor? Evidence from China. Soc Indic Res 147, 45–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02145-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Linking social capital
  • Income inequality
  • Health inequality
  • Extended regression model