A Hybrid Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Model with Modified PROMETHEE for Identifying Optimal Performance-Improvement Strategies for Sustainable Development of a Better Life
- 32 Downloads
Governments worldwide are cognizant of the deficiencies of measuring quality of life according to gross domestic product; consequently, they have created indicators of citizen well-being that can be applied in governmental policy. To improve citizens’ lives, governments should create an environment with maximal quality of life, ideal material living conditions, and sustainable well-being and determine the true needs of citizens. This paper proposes a hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making model with a modified PROMETHEE method that can identify practical performance-improvement strategies for the sustainable development of a better life by accounting for the complex dependencies among the indicators. In the proposed model, an influential network relation map is first obtained using the DEMATEL method to delineate the interrelationships among the indicators. Second, to address the feedback and dependence concerns associated with interrelationships among criteria, the influence weights are identified through the DANP method. Finally, the degree of preference is determined through the modified PROMETHEE method and combined with the influence weights to calculate flow indicators, which facilitate attaining the aspiration level. The aspiration level is set and an aspiration alternative is identified as an improvement benchmark to facilitate continual melioration and sustainable development of a better life. This model uses the OECD well-being indicators consisting of 11 dimensions and 24 criteria to measure material living conditions (namely housing, income, jobs) and quality of life (namely civic engagement, community, education, environment, health, life satisfaction, safety, and work–life balance). An empirical case study was performed to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model by using questionnaire data of six cities in Taiwan. Our results prove that the proposed model (aspired-worst as benchmark) outperforms the traditional model (max–min as benchmark) and that it can obtain more realistic net flows and an improvement benchmark to conduct ranking, selection, and continual improvement for facilitating sustainable development of a better life.
KeywordsAspiration level Performance-improvement strategies Sustainable development Hybrid MADM (multiple attribute decision-making) Modified PROMETHEE (preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations) INRM (influential network relationship map) DANP (DEMATEL-based analytic network process)
- Bhutan. (2005). Gross national happiness. Bhutan: Bhutan Publishing. http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- Brans, J. P. (1982). Lingenierie de la decision. Elaboration dinstruments daide a la decision. Methode PROMETHEE. In R. Nadeau & M. Landry (Eds.), Laide a la decision: Nature, instrument set perspectives Davenir (pp. 183–214). Quebec: Presses de Universite Laval.Google Scholar
- Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445–469.Google Scholar
- Directorate‐General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. (2013). Happiness index. Taiwan Publishing. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=34777&ctNode=5624. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- Directorate‐General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. (2016). Happiness index. Taiwan Publishing. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40131&ctNode=5624.
- Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Canada. (2011). Canada Publishing. https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing
- Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences, United States of America. (2008). The key national indicators act. America Publishing. http://nationalacademyofsciences.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- OECD. (2011a). OECD better life index. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- OECD. (2011b). Better policies for better lives. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- OECD. (2011c). Compendium of OECD well-being indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/general/compendiumofoecdwell-beingindicators.htm. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom. (2011). England Publishing. https://www.ons.gov.uk. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade.Google Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
- The National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, France. (2010). Analyses and disseminates information on the French economy and society. France Publishing. https://www.insee.fr/en/accueil
- Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., & Sarka, V. (1994). The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1, 131–139.Google Scholar