Advertisement

Does Inequality Cause a Difference in Altruism Between the Rich and the Poor? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment

  • Yen-Sheng Chiang
  • Jacqueline Chen Chen
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing research evidence indicates that economic inequality leads the rich to be less generous than the poor. While compelling, the underling mechanism of the finding remains elusive. We conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate how inequality influences people’s behavior in a sharing game. We test varying causes of inequality to see how people share payoffs with others when inequality is caused respectively by chance, competition, and choice. The experiment result shows that the rich give less than the poor only when inequality is self-chosen. Yet, different from findings in previous studies, increasing inequality does not reinforce, but instead mitigates the negative relationship of income and giving. Our study suggests that research on the consequences of inequality should be careful on discerning whether self-choice of inequality could account for the spurious effect of inequality on people’s prosocial behavior.

Keywords

Inequality Altruism Competition Self-selection Experimentation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the financial support of the “Direct Grant” provided by the Faculty of the Social Sciences of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

References

  1. Arai, M. (2011). Cluster-robust Standard Errors Using R. http://www.ne.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.216115.1426234213!/menu/standard/file/clustering1.pdf.
  2. Babones, S. J. (2008). Income inequality and population health: Correlation and causality. Social Science and Medicine, 66(7), 1614–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baland, J. M., Pranab, B. K., & Bowles, S. (Eds.). (2007). Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137(6), 881–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, J. L., & Barclay, P. (2016). Local Competition increases people’s willingness to harm others. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boix, C. (2010). Origins and persistence of economic inequality. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buser, T., Niederle, M., & Oosterbeek, H. (2014). Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1409–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buunk, A. P., & Massar, K. (2012). Intrasexual competition among males: Competitive towards men, prosocial towards women. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 818–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charness, G., & Villeval, M. C. (2017). Behavioural economics: Preserving rank as a social norm. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Côté, S., Houser, J., & Willer, R. (2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52), 15838–15843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly, M. (2016). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Duffy, J., & Kornienko, T. (2010). Does competition affect giving? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1), 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Nikiforakis, N. (2011). Relative earnings and giving in a real-effort experiment. The American Economic Review, 101(7), 3330–3348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from Multilevel Models of US States and Counties. Social Science Research, 42(2), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, A. P., & Lindenberg, S. (Eds.). (2006). Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gornick, J.C., & Milanovic, B. (2015). Income inequality in the United States in Cross-National Perspective: Redistribution revisited. Luxembourg Income Study Center. http://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/CUNY-Graduate-Center/PDF/Centers/LIS/LIS-Center-Research-Brief-1-2015.pdf?ext=.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.
  21. Gottschalk, P., & Smeeding, T. M. (1997). Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 633–687.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobs, L. R., & Soss, J. (2010). The politics of inequality in America: A political economy framework. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87(9), 1491–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keister, L. A., & Moller, S. (2000). Wealth inequality in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korndörfer, M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015). A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE, 10(7), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the Poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuziemko, I., Buell, R. W., Reich, T., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Last-place aversion’: Evidence and redistributive implications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 105–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lancee, B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1166–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (1992). U. S. Earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1333–1381.Google Scholar
  31. Loughnan, S., Kuppens, P., Allik, J., Balazs, K., De Lemus, S., Rafael Gargurevich, R., et al. (2011). Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1254–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCall, L., & Percheski, C. (2010). Income inequality: New trends and research directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niederle, M., & Versterlund, L. (2011). Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 601–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nishi, A., & Christakis, N. A. (2015). Human behavior under economic inequality shapes inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52), 15781–15782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quantile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Payne, K. B., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Hannay, J. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4643–4648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086–4091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schurr, A., & Ritov, I. (2016). Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(7), 1754–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stephany, F. (2016). Who are your Joneses? Socio-specific income inequality and trust. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1460-9.
  41. Subramanian, S. V., & Kawachi, I. (2004). Income inequality and health: What have we learned so far? Epidemiologic Reviews, 26(1), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tavoni, A., Dannenberg, A., Kallis, G., & Löschel, A. (2011). Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(29), 11825–11829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (Eds.). (2009). Altruism and prosocial behavior in groups. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.  https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-6145%282009%2926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trautmann, S. T., Van de Kuilen, G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2013). Social class and (un) ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33(6), 868–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of koint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine, 62(7), 1768–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyAcademia SinicaTaipeiRepublic of China
  2. 2.Department of SociologySouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations