Does Inequality Cause a Difference in Altruism Between the Rich and the Poor? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
- 22 Downloads
Increasing research evidence indicates that economic inequality leads the rich to be less generous than the poor. While compelling, the underling mechanism of the finding remains elusive. We conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate how inequality influences people’s behavior in a sharing game. We test varying causes of inequality to see how people share payoffs with others when inequality is caused respectively by chance, competition, and choice. The experiment result shows that the rich give less than the poor only when inequality is self-chosen. Yet, different from findings in previous studies, increasing inequality does not reinforce, but instead mitigates the negative relationship of income and giving. Our study suggests that research on the consequences of inequality should be careful on discerning whether self-choice of inequality could account for the spurious effect of inequality on people’s prosocial behavior.
KeywordsInequality Altruism Competition Self-selection Experimentation
We appreciate the financial support of the “Direct Grant” provided by the Faculty of the Social Sciences of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
- Arai, M. (2011). Cluster-robust Standard Errors Using R. http://www.ne.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.216115.1426234213!/menu/standard/file/clustering1.pdf.
- Baland, J. M., Pranab, B. K., & Bowles, S. (Eds.). (2007). Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Daly, M. (2016). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, A. P., & Lindenberg, S. (Eds.). (2006). Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gornick, J.C., & Milanovic, B. (2015). Income inequality in the United States in Cross-National Perspective: Redistribution revisited. Luxembourg Income Study Center. http://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/CUNY-Graduate-Center/PDF/Centers/LIS/LIS-Center-Research-Brief-1-2015.pdf?ext=.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.
- Gottschalk, P., & Smeeding, T. M. (1997). Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 633–687.Google Scholar
- Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (1992). U. S. Earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3), 1333–1381.Google Scholar
- Stephany, F. (2016). Who are your Joneses? Socio-specific income inequality and trust. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1460-9.
- Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar