What is Important for Well-Being?
- 118 Downloads
This paper examines the importance of five dimensions (health, income, education, family life, and social life) to the well-being of the Flemish society. The importance of these dimensions is determined by the opinions of the sampled individuals. Using point allocation and direct rating to derive these opinions, we aim to determine which dimensions are considered most important to well-being and the individual heterogeneities that drive this importance. We also aim to study the relationship between the outcome on a dimension (i.e. the self-reported existing situation) and its importance. Summary statistics show that, on average, health and family life are the two most crucial aspects of well-being. Results of linear regressions reveal that older individuals regard health, education, and social life to be crucial. Individuals who have a high trust in people and/or are highly educated regard income as a less crucial dimension. Our results also show that contrary to social life, family life matters more to respondents who have kids and/or a partner. Education, social and family life outcomes demonstrate a weak, positive correlation with their respective importance. Our findings imply that enhancing health, supporting family life, and promoting a vibrant social life for the elderly help increase well-being in Flanders.
KeywordsMulti-dimensional well-being Non-paternalism Point allocation Direct rating
- De Neve, J. E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2013 (pp. 54–79). New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part one: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10, 185–246.Google Scholar
- Gjonca, E., & Calderwood, L. (2004). Socio-demographic characteristics. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available at: https://www.ifs.org.uk/elsa/report03/ch2.pdf.
- Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. New York, NY: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2018). World happiness report. New York, NY: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P. (2016). Standardisation and harmonisation of socio-demographic variables. In GESIS survey guidelines. Mannheim, Germany: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15465/gesis-sg_en_012.
- Joskin, A. (2017). What matter to belgians? Federal Planning Bureau. Available at https://www.plan.be/admin/uploaded/201706142027480.WP_1704_11482_E.pdf.
- OECD. (2011b). Compendium of OECD well-being indicators. Available at: www.oecd.org/sdd/47917288.pdf.
- OECD. (2017). Education at a Glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Plummer, W. D., Jr., & Dupont, W. D. (2003). Density distribution sunflower plots. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. A. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.Google Scholar
- Takeuchi, L. (2014). Incorporating people’s values in development: Weighting alternatives. Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Available at: http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9023.pdf.