Advertisement

Urbanization, Economic Structure, Political Regime, and Income Inequality

  • Samuel Adams
  • Edem Kwame Mensah Klobodu
Article
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

The study examined the effect of urbanization on income inequality for 21 Sub Saharan African countries over the period 1984–2014 using heterogeneous panel estimation techniques. Based on the Pooled Mean Group and Common Correlated Effects Mean Group estimation techniques, the findings of the study do not support the Kuznets hypothesis. The results show that democratic reforms are negative and significantly related to income inequality. On the other hand, the share of agriculture in GDP and foreign direct investment do not have an independent robust effect on income inequality while GDP per capita, trade openness and urbanization have positive effects on income inequality. However, the findings show that institutional quality moderates the effect of urbanization on income inequality in the long-run.

Keywords

Urbanization Democratic reforms Institutional quality Income inequality FDI Heterogeneous panel techniques 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 385–472.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, S. (2008). Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(5), 725–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, S., & Atsu, F. (2015). Assessing the distributional effects of regulation in developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(5), 713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, S., & Klobodu, E. K. M. (2016). Financial development, control of corruption and income inequality. International Review of Applied Economics, 30(6), 790–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Awokuse, T. O., & Xie, R. (2015). Does agriculture really matter for economic growth in developing countries? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 63(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bacolod, M., Blum, B. S., & Strange, W. C. (2009). Skills in the city. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(2), 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bardhan, P. (2005). Institutions matter, but which ones? Economics of Transition, 13(3), 499–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrios, S., Bertinelli, L., & Strobl, E. (2006). Climatic change and rural–urban migration: The case of sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrios, S., & Strobl, E. (2005). The dynamics of regional inequalities. Economic Papers, 229, 1–38.Google Scholar
  13. Baum-Snow, N., & Pavan, R. (2013). Inequality and city size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1535–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Behrens, K., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2014). Survival of the fittest in cities: Urbanisation and inequality. The Economic Journal, 124(581), 1371–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bocquier, P., & Mukandila, A. K. (2011). African urbanization trends and prospects. African Population Studies, 25(2), 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bollen, K. A. (1980). Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review, 1, 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review, 1, 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F. H., & Walton, M. (2007). Equity, efficiency and inequality traps: A research agenda. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bowles, S. (2004). Institutional poverty traps. In S. Bowles, S. N. Durlauf, & K. Hoff (Eds.), Poverty traps (pp. 116–138). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003). Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics, 55(02), 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Calì, M. (2008). Urbanisation, inequality and economic growth: Evidence from Indian states and towns. Background note for the World Development Report. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Carmignani, F. (2009). The distributive effects of institutional quality when government stability is endogenous. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chintrakarn, P., Herzer, D., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2012). FDI and income inequality: Evidence from a panel of US states. Economic Inquiry, 50(3), 788–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chong, A., & Gradstein, M. (2007). Inequality and institutions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Collier, P. (2009). The political economy of state failure. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dabla-Norris, E., Guo, S., Haksar, V., Kim, M., Kochhar, K., Wiseman, K., et al. (2015). The new normal: A sector-level perspective on growth and productivity trends in advanced economies. Washington: IMF.Google Scholar
  29. De Ferranti, D., Perry, G. E., Ferreira, F., & Walton, M. (2004). Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History? The World Bank. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Easaw, J. Z., & Savoia, A. (2009). Inequality in developing economies: The role of institutional development. Society for the study of economic inequality—ECINEQ, Working Paper 2009/121.Google Scholar
  32. Esping-Andersen, G. (2000). Two societies, one sociology, and no theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fields, G. S., & Wan, H. (1989). Wage-setting institutions and economic growth. World Development, 17(9), 1471–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fox, S. (2012). Urbanization as a global historical process: Theory and evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review, 38(2), 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fujita, M., & Hu, D. (2001). Regional disparity in China 1985–1994: The effects of globalization and economic liberalization. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gerring, J., Bond, P., Barndt, W. T., & Moreno, C. (2005). Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective. World Politics, 57(3), 323–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ghosh, S., & Kanjilal, K. (2014). Long-term equilibrium relationship between urbanization, energy consumption and economic activity: Empirical evidence from India. Energy, 66, 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gollin, D., Jedwab, R., & Vollrath, D. (2016). Urbanization with and without industrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Herzer, D., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2011). FDI and income inequality: Evidence from Europe. Kiel working paper no. 1675. Institute for the World Economy.Google Scholar
  42. Hirschman, A. O. (1978). Exit, voice, and the state. World Politics, 31(1), 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huber, J. D. (1996). The vote of confidence in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huber, E. (2002) (Ed). Conclusion: Actors, institutions, and policies. In Models of capitalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press (pp. 439–79).Google Scholar
  45. Huber, E., Nielsen, F., Pribble, J., & Stephens, J. D. (2006). Politics and inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jedwab, R. (2013). Urbanization without structural transformation: Evidence from consumption cities in Africa. Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  48. Kanbur, R., & Zhuang, J. (2013). Urbanization and inequality in Asia. Asian Development Review, 30, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kawsar, M. A. (2012). Urbanization, economic development and inequality. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 6(4), 440–448.Google Scholar
  50. Korpi, W. (1985). Power resources approach vs. action and conflict: On causal and intentional explanations in the study of power. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kotschy, R., & Sunde, U. (2017). Democracy, inequality, and institutional quality. European Economic Review, 91, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations. National Bureau of Economic Research, 110, 857.Google Scholar
  53. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  54. Lee, C. (2005). Income inequality, democracy, and public sector size. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 158–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leipziger, D. (2015). Urbanization in Africa: Why nations rely on cities. http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/future-development/posts/2015/06/18-urbanization-africa-leipziger. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.
  56. Lenski, G. E. (1966). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political development. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lucas, R. E. (2000). Some macroeconomics for the 21st century. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Malesky, E., Abrami, R., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Institutions and inequality in single-party regimes: A comparative analysis of Vietnam and China. Comparative Politics, 43(4), 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McGranahan, G., Schensul, D., & Singh, G. (2016). Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Milanovic, B. (2003). TIs inequality in Africa really different? Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moller, S., Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2009). Changing patterns of income inequality in U.S. counties, 1970–2000. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1037–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Muller, E. N. (1988). Democracy, economic development, and income inequality. American Sociological Review, 53(1), 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mueller, D. C., & Murrell, P. (1986). Interest groups and the size of government. Public Choice, 48(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Myrdal, G., & Sitohang, P. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: G. Duckworth.Google Scholar
  69. Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1995). Income inequality, development, and dualism: Results from an unbalanced cross-national panel. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1997). The Kuznets curve and the great U-turn: Income inequality in US counties, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 1, 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Olson, M. (1965). Logic of collective action public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  75. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74, 967–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Raleigh, C., & Urdal, H. (2007). Climate change, environmental degradation and armed conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 674–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rodrik, D. (2000). Participatory politics, social cooperation, and economic stability. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  82. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1997). Sources of slow growth in African economies. Journal of African Economies, 6, 335–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Savoia, A., Easaw, J., & McKay, A. (2010). Inequality, democracy, and institutions: A critical review of recent research. World Development, 38(2), 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shaowei, C., & Jinrong, J. (2014). The relationship of financial development, urbanization and urban-rural income gap: An empirical research based on provincial panel data in China. SHS Web of Conferences 6(01009). EDP Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20140601009.
  86. Sirowy, L., & Inkeles, A. (1990). The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25, 126–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sow, M. (2015). Foresight Africa 2016: Urbanization in the African context [Blog post]. Retrieved December 4, 2016 from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2015/12/30/foresightafrica-2016-urbanization-in-the-african-context/.
  89. Sy, A. (2014). Jobless growth in Sub-Saharan Africa [Blog post]. Retrieved December 4, 2016 from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2014/01/30/jobless-growth-in-sub-saharan-africa/.
  90. Sy, A. (2016). Foresight Africa: Top priorities for the continent in 2016. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  91. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2014). Human development report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: UNDP. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/highlights/wup2014-highlights.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.
  92. Un-habitat. (2010). State of the world’s cities 2010/2011: Bridging the urban divide. Un-habitat.Google Scholar
  93. Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of the patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4), 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. World Bank. (2015). Rising through cities in Ghana: Ghana urbanization review overview report. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  95. World Bank. (2016). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  96. Wu, D., & Rao, P. (2016). Urbanization and income inequality in China: An empirical investigation at provincial level. Social Indicators Research, 131, 1–26.Google Scholar
  97. Yaojun, Y. (2005). Financial development, urbanization and urban–rural income gap in China——Co-integration analysis and granger causality test. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG200502000.htm. Accessed 4 Dec 2016.
  98. Yi, D. J. (2013). Politics and income inequality: Does politics still matter in new democracies. New Political Economy, 18(5), 653–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yi, D. J., & Woo, J. H. (2015). Democracy, policy, and inequality: Efforts and consequences in the developing world. International Political Science Review, 36(5), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhou, Y., & Qin, Y. (2012). Empirical analysis on income inequality of Chinese residents. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Service and GovernanceGhana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA)Achimota, AccraGhana

Personalised recommendations