Social Indicators Research

, Volume 142, Issue 1, pp 201–227 | Cite as

A Multidimensional Analysis of Quality of Life: Pakistan’s Context

  • Nadeen Ihsan
  • Babar AzizEmail author


Quality of Life (QoL) is a multi-dimensional idea that includes various distinctive dimensions and its estimation is considered as an essential factor for policy assessment. The study estimates the inter-district variation in QoL in Pakistan by using a data set of Household Integrated Economic Survey of 2010–2011. Objective and subjective indices are constructed to measure QoL with 7 domains and 31 indicators within 89 districts of Pakistan by employing the principal component analysis. The leading result of the study reveals that top ranked district is Jhelum in term of QoL and Tharparkar is at the bottom. The analysis also reveals that the most of the top ranked districts are located in Punjab province. This reflects the better performance of the province in term objective and QoL indices. Whereas, the districts of Balochistan emerge at the lower end in terms of objective and QoL indices. Majority districts of Punjab shows a modest level of satisfaction regarding the facilities provided by the government and the least satisfied districts belong to KPK and Sindh. It is interesting to identify that disparity in the objective index and subjective perceptions are representing QoL differences.


Quality of Life Well-being Objective and Subjective Indicators Principal Component Analysis 


  1. Alfaiate, J., Bottini, N., Clarke, S., Dengler, S., Gamester, N., Omic, E. et al. (2013). The Legatum Prosperity Index™. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from
  2. Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2009). Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai City, South China: A public survey using the International Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 91(2), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2), 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Everatt, D. (2017). Quality of life in the Gauteng City-Region, South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 130(1), 71–86. Scholar
  6. Government of Pakistan. (2014). Economic survey of Pakistan 2013–2014. Islamabad: Federal Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  7. Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Haq, H. (2009). Measuring human wellbeing in Pakistan: Objective versus subjective indicators. MPRA paper, 38968, University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Haq, R., Ahmed, A., & Shafique, S. (2010). Variation in the quality of life within Punjab: Evidence from MICS, 2007–2008. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(4), 863–879.Google Scholar
  10. Haq, R., & Zia, U. (2008). Dimensions of wellbeing and millennium development goals. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4), 851–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2013). World happiness report. Retrieved March 8, 2014, from
  12. Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J. (2006). Subjective well-being poverty vs. income poverty and capabilities poverty? The Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), 1199–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krishnan, V. (2010). Constructing an area-based socioeconomic index: A principal components analysis approach. Unpublished Manuscript. Early Child Development Mapping Project, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
  14. Li, L., Young, D., Wei, H., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Xiao, S., et al. (2010). The relationship between objective life status and subjective life satisfaction with quality of life. Behavioral Medicine, 23(4), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liao, P. (2009). Parallels between objective indicators and subjective perceptions of quality of life: A study of metropolitan and county areas in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malik, K. (2013). Human development report 2013. The rise of the south: Human progress in a diverse world. Retrieved February 22, 2014, from
  17. Malkina-Pykh, I. G., & Pykh, Y. A. (2008). Quality-of-life indicators at different scales: Theoretical background. Ecological Indicators, 8(6), 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. ‎Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Ngoo, Y. T., Tey, N. P., & Tan, E. C. (2015). Determinants of life satisfaction in Asia. Social Indicators Research, 124(1), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. OECD. (2015). How’s life? 2015: Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved November 27, 2015, from
  21. O’Rourke, N., & Hatcher, L. (2013). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Pasha, G. A., & Ahmed, N. (1999). Pakistan’s ranking in social development: Have We always been backward? The Pakistan Development Review, 38(4), 739–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pasha, H. A., & Hasan, T. (1982). Development ranking of districts of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 1(2), 157–192.Google Scholar
  24. Rahman, T., Mittelhammer, R. C., & Wandschneider, P. R. (2011). Measuring quality of life across countries: A multiple indicators and multiple causes approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rojas, M. (2011). The ‘Measurement of economic performance and social progress’ report and quality of life: Moving forward. Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Self, A. (2017). Quality of life measurement and application to policy: Experiences from the UK Office for National Statistics. Social Indicators Research, 130(1), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Self, A., Thomas, J., & Randall, C. (2012). Measuring national well-being: Life in the UK 2012. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from
  28. Selim, S. (2008). Life satisfaction and happiness in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 531–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siddiqui, R. (2008). Income, public social services, and capability development: A cross-district analysis of Pakistan. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Sirgy, M. J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skevington, S. M. (2009). Conceptualising dimensions of quality of life in poverty. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slottje, D. J. (1991). Measuring the quality of life across countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), 684–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2009). Economic development. London: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
  34. Türksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ura, K., Alkire, S., Zangmo, T., & Wangdi, K. (2012). A short guide to gross national happiness index. Retrieved March 3, 2014, from
  36. Wish, N. B. (1986). Are we really measuring the quality of life? Well-being has subjective dimensions, as well as objective ones. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45(1), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu, H. F., & Tam, T. (2015). Economic development and socioeconomic inequality of well-being: A cross-sectional time-series analysis of urban China, 2003–2011. Social Indicators Research, 124(2), 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zorondo-Rodríguez, F., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Demps, K., Ariza-Montobbio, P., García, C., & Reyes-García, V. (2012). What defines quality of life? The gap between public policies and locally defined indicators among residents of Kodagu, Karnataka (India). Social Indicators Research, 115(1), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forman Christian CollegeA Chartered UniversityLahorePakistan
  2. 2.NUR International UniversityLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations