Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 731–763 | Cite as

Population Structure and the Human Development Index

  • Carmen Herrero
  • Ricardo Martínez
  • Antonio VillarEmail author
Article
  • 487 Downloads

Abstract

This paper provides an alternative way of measuring human development that takes explicitly into account the differences in the countries’ population structures. The interest of this proposal stems from two complementary elements. First, that there is an enormous diversity in the population structures of those countries analysed in the Human Development Reports, particularly the shares of old people in the population. Second, that demographic characteristics are relevant in the evaluation of development possibilities. We propose to change the way of measuring health, education and material wellbeing, in order to take into account those differences in the population structures. Regarding the health component, we substitute Life Expectancy at Birth by Life Potential (the average life expectancy of the current population); concerning education, we change the average between Mean Years of Schooling and Expected Years of Schooling by the Education Potential (a variable that mimics life potential in this context). As for the material well-being, we propose using the Gross National Income per adult, instead of per capita, while keeping logs in the evaluation. The resulting indicator, called Demographically Adjusted Human Development Index, is the geometric mean of the three new variables suitably normalised. We analyse empirically the effect induced by these changes in the evaluation of human development by comparing this way of measurement with the conventional Human Development Index (HDI) for 168 countries.

Keywords

Human development Health Education Income Life potential Education potential 

JEL Classification

O15 I31 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges financial support from Project ECO2015-65820-P (MINECO/FEDER,UE). The second author also wishes to acknowledge financial support from Project ECO2017-86245-P (MINECO/FEDER/UE), as well as Junta de Andalucía under Project SEJ426. The third author acknowledges financial support from Project ECO2015-65408-R (MINECO/FEDER/UE)

References

  1. Abad-González, J., & Martínez, R. (2016). Endogenous categorization of the human development. Applied Economics Letters, 24, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017). Secular stagnation? The effect of aging on economic growth in the age of automation. In NBER Working Papers, 23077.Google Scholar
  3. Bilbao-Ubillos, J. (2013). Another approach to measuring human development: The composite Dynamic Human Development Index. Social Indicators Research, 111, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2010). Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26, 583–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukuda-Parr, S., Lawson-Remer, T., & Randolph, S. (2009). An Index of economic and social rights fulfillment: Concept and methodology. Journal of Human Rights, 8, 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2012). A household-based human development index. World Development, 40, 878–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herrero, C., Martínez, R., & Villar, A. (2010). Multidimensional social evaluation: An application to the measurement of human development. Review of Income and Wealth, 56, 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrero, C., Martínez, R., & Villar, A. (2012). A newer human development index. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13, 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jahan, S. (2015). Human Development Report 2015. United Nations.Google Scholar
  10. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Lind, N. (2010). Values reflected in the Human Development Index. Social Indicators Research, 66, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lutz, W., & KC, S. (2013). Demography and human development: Education and population projections. In Occasional Paper UNDP Human Development Report Office, 4.Google Scholar
  14. Maestas, N., Mullen, K., & Powell, D. (2016). The effect of population aging on economic growth, the labor force and productivity. In NBER Working Papers, 22452.Google Scholar
  15. Pinilla, R., & Goerlich, F. (2003). Renta per cápita y potencial de calidad de vida (QLP) en España (1981–1999). In Working Paper IVIE, 2.Google Scholar
  16. Sen, A. (1987). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Seth, S., & Villar, A. (2017a). Human development, inequality and poverty: Empirical findings. In C. D’Ambrosio (Ed.), Handbook of research on economic and social wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Seth, S., & Villar, A. (2017b). The measurement of human development and poverty. In C. D’Ambrosio (Ed.), Handbook of research on economic and social wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2015). Global wealth report 2015. Zurich: Crédite Suisse.Google Scholar
  20. Suri, T., Boozer, M. A., Ranis, G., & Stewart, F. (2011). Paths to success: The relationship between human development and economic growth. World Development, 39, 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. United Nations. (2015). World Population Ageing 2015. Population Division: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis EconómicoUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Departmento de Teoría e Historia EconómicaUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversidad Pablo de OlvideSevilleSpain
  4. 4.IvieValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations