Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 791–808 | Cite as

What Drives Citizen Participation in Political Gatherings in Modern South Africa? A Quantitative Analysis of Self-Reported Behaviour

  • Steven GordonEmail author
  • Jarè Struwig
  • Benjamin Roberts
  • Ngqapheli Mchunu
  • Samela Mtyingizane
  • Thobeka Radebe
Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

Community and public gatherings are an important component of political participation in sub-Saharan Africa. Formal and informal community meetings and rallies are instrumental to the practice of politics in many parts of the continent. However, little multidimensional research has focused on the drivers of this form of political participation in an African context. This study will examine determinants of participation using South African data from the nationally representative 2015 voter participation survey. Despite its unique history of colonialism, South Africa represents a microcosm of major trends in African politics. Our results show that cognitive awareness of politics is the main determinant of participation in political gatherings. Attitudes towards municipal performance also had a statistically significant impact on the behaviour of this kind. The effects of education and economic status were found to be contrary to theoretical expectations. The implications of our findings for research into collective forms of political participation are discussed in the conclusion.

Keywords

Political participation South Africa Cognitive awareness Political gatherings Local government 

References

  1. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. New York: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. W. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bedasso, B. E., & Obikili, N. (2016). A dream deferred: The microfoundations of direct political action in pre- and post-democratisation South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(1), 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, P. (2012). South African people power since the mid-1980s: Two steps forward, one back. Third World Quarterly, 33(2), 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Booysen, S. (2017). Fees must fall: Student revolt, decolonisation and governance in South Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Broms, R. (2015). Putting up or shutting up: On the individual-level relationship between taxpaying and political interest in a developmental context. Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coffe, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2011). Gender gaps in political participation across sub-Saharan African nations. Social Indicators Research, 102(2), 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalton, R. J. (2006). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (5th ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Eze, M. O. (2010). Ubuntu: Many voices of a history. In M. O. Eze (Ed.), Intellectual history in contemporary South Africa (pp. 89–118). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Freedom House (2017) Freedom of the press 2017: Press freedom’s dark horizon. New York: Freedhom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FOTP_2017_booklet_FINAL_April28.pdf.Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
  12. Gade, C. B. N. (2012). What is Ubuntu? Different interpretations among South Africans of African descent. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. Cape Town: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inoguchi, T., Kumar, S., & Mikami, S. (2007). Macro-political origins of micro-political differences: A comparison of eleven societies in East and South Asia. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 387–408.Google Scholar
  16. Kaase, M. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 22(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, Y.-C. (2007). Unconventional political participation in the new democracies during the 1990s: Poland, Mexico, South Africa and South Korea. Journal of East and West Studies, 19(1), 191–214.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, H. H. (2014). Generalised trust, institutional trust and political participation. Asian Journal of Social Science, 42(6), 695–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koelble, T. A., & Siddle, A. (2014). Institutional complexity and unanticipated consequences: The failure of decentralization in South Africa. Democratization, 21(6), 1117–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kotzé, H. (2001). Unconventional political participation and political confidence in South Africa: A longitudinal analysis using data from the world values study. Social Dynamics, 27(2), 134–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marien, S., Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2010). Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58(1), 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinez, L. M. (2005). Yes we can: Latino participation in unconventional politics. Social Forces, 84(1), 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matebesi, S. (2017). Civil strife against local governance: Dynamics of community protests in contemporary South Africa. Berlin: Barbara Budrich-Esser.Google Scholar
  25. Mattes, R. (2008). South Africans’ participation in local politics and government. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 66(1), 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norris, P. (1996). Does television Erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. Political Science and Politics, 29(3), 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in post-industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parry, G., Moyser, G., & Day, N. (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ribot, J. C. (2002). African decentralization: Local actors, powers and accountability. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
  30. Roberts, B. J., & Hemson, D. (2008). Batho pele principles, perceived municipal performance and political behaviour in South Africa. Critical Dialogue, 4(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  31. Schulz-Herzenberg, C. (2014). Trends in electoral participation. In C. Schulz-Herzenberg & R. Southall (Eds.), Election 2014: South Africa (pp. 1994–2014). Jacana Media: Cape Town.Google Scholar
  32. Stockemer, D. (2014). What drives unconventional political participation? A two level study. Social Science Journal, 51(2), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stromback, J., & Shehata, A. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 575–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Deth, J. W., & Elff, M. (2004). Politicisation, economic development and political interest in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wang, Z. (2007). Postmodern values in seven confucian societies: Political consequences of changing world views. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 341–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Gordon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jarè Struwig
    • 2
  • Benjamin Roberts
    • 1
  • Ngqapheli Mchunu
    • 1
  • Samela Mtyingizane
    • 1
  • Thobeka Radebe
    • 1
  1. 1.Democracy Governance and Service Delivery Research ProgrammeHuman Sciences Research Council (HSRC)DurbanSouth Africa
  2. 2.Democracy Governance and Service Delivery Research ProgrammeHuman Sciences Research Council (HSRC)PretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations