Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 703–729 | Cite as

The Global Integration and Transmission of Social Values: A Case of Family Ties

  • Muhammad Tariq MajeedEmail author
  • Shamsa Kanwal
Article

Abstract

Family ties are arguably of particular importance in an era of globalization, where ideological and material changes in national and global arena intersect with personal choices and decisions that influence family life. As globalization proceeds, so do the choices, dilemmas, opportunities, threats and outcomes that are followed by the dynamic process of globalization. This study determines the links of global interactions with family ties using cross-sectional and panel data sets over the period 1980–2014. The global integration is measured using three dimensions of globalization that are economic, social and political globalization. The empirical results show that overall globalization negatively affects family ties. However, this effect varies depending upon the measures of globalization. Economic and social globalizations negatively influence family ties while the role of political globalization is insignificant. Moreover, the results of social globalization are relatively more conducive and strong. Finally, results also suggest that income inequality tends to negatively influence the strength family ties. Findings of the study are robust to different specifications, alternative estimation methods and various control variables.

Keywords

Social values Family ties Globalization Social globalization 

JEL Classification

A13 F6 Z10 Z13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are extremely thankful to the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable input to improve the quality of this manuscript. All errors and omissions belong to the authors.

References

  1. Adserà, A. (2004). Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhter, S. H. (2004). Is globalization what it’s cracked up to be? Economic freedom, corruption and human development. Journal of World Business, 39(3), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alber, J., & Standing, G. (2000). Social dumping, catch-up or convergence? Europe in a comparative global context. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(2), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Family values and the regulation of labor. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(4), 599–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2010). The power of the family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 93–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2011). Family ties and political participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2013). Family ties. NBER working paper series, 18966.Google Scholar
  8. Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2007). The roots of low European employment: family culture? NBER macroeconomics annual. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Economic inequality and intolerance: Attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 942–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ballew, K. C. (2011). Family values: The empirical impact of internet use. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  11. Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Glencol.Google Scholar
  12. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage, part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2015). Globalization and the transmission of social values: The case of tolerance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(2), 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berman, Y. (1982). Economic uncertainty and family instability. Social Indicators Research, 11(1), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berry, J. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2000). Beyond the melting pot: Cultural transmission, marriage, and the evolution of ethnic and religious traits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 955–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2001). The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2), 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blank, R. M., & Freeman, R. B. (1994). Evaluating the connection between social protection and economic flexibility. In R. M. Blank (Ed.), Social protection versus economic flexibility: Is there a trade-off? (pp. 21–42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4419-7988-9_13#citeas
  21. Boli, J., & Lechner, F. J. (2001). Globalization and world culture. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(10), 225–232.Google Scholar
  22. Botha, F., & Booysen, F. (2014). Family functioning and life satisfaction and happiness in South African households. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castles, F. (1995). Welfare state development in Southern Europe. Western European Politics, 18, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang, W. C. (2013). Family ties, living arrangement, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cozma, I. F. (2011). The relation between globalization and personal values across 53 countries and 28 years. Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
  27. Darling, C. A., & Turkki, K. (2009). Global family concerns and the role of family life education: An eco-systemic analysis. Family Relations, 58(1), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ermisch, J., & Gambetta, D. (2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Esping- Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundation of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Esping-Andersen, G. (1994). After the golden age: the future of the welfare state in the new global order (No. 7). UNRISD Occasional Paper: World Summit for Social Development.Google Scholar
  32. Ferrera, M. (1996). The southern model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of the European Social Policy, 1, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fischer, S. (2003). Globalization and its challenges. The American Economic Review, 93(2), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedman, D., Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1994). A theory of the value of children. Demography, 31(3), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  36. Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gauthier, A. H. (2002). Family policies in industrialized countries: Is there convergence? Population, 57(3), 457–484.Google Scholar
  38. Ghazanfar, S., Zeeshan, M., Kifayat, U., Shehnaz, S., & Hussain, M. (2015). Changes in family values due to information communication technologies. Explorer, 1(10), 385–389.Google Scholar
  39. Giuliano, P. (2007). Living arrangements in Western Europe: Does cultural origin matter? Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(5), 927–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffmann-Nowotny, H. J., & Fux, B. (2001). Sociological analysis. In A. Pinnelli, H. J. Hoffmann-Nowotny, & B. Fux (Eds.), Fertility and new types of households and family formation in Europe. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  41. Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (1998). Internationalization and the social democratic model: Crisis and future prospects. Comparative Political Studies, 31(3), 353–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: A Touchstone Book.Google Scholar
  43. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., & McKenzie, J. (2011). Globalization and cultural identity developments in adolescence and emerging adulthood. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 285–301). New York: Springer Publishing Company. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4419-7988-9_13
  44. Jensen, R., & Oster, E. (2009). The power of TV: Cable television and women’s status in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1057–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson, A. J., Haigh, M. M., Becker, J. A., Craig, E. A., & Wigley, S. (2008). College students’ use of relational management strategies in email in long-distance and geographically close relationships. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(2), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 7, 127–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kreyenfeld, M. (2010). Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review, 26, 51–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mahler, S. J. (2001). Transnational relationships: The struggle to communicate across borders. Identities Global Studies in Culture and Power, 7(4), 583–619.Google Scholar
  49. Majeed, M. T. (2017). Quality of life and globalization: Evidence from Islamic countries. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1–17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-017-9554-3#citeas
  50. Majeed, M. T., & Malik, A. (2017). Selling souls: An empirical analysis of human trafficking and globalization. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 11(1), 452–487.Google Scholar
  51. Medjuck, S. (1986). The social consequences of economic cycles on nineteenth-century households and family life. Social Indicators Research, 18(3), 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mills, M. (2014). Globalisation and family life. In A. Abela & J. Walker (Eds.), Contemporary issues in family studies: Global perspectives on partnerships, parenting and support in a changing world. Oxford: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118320990.ch17
  54. Mills, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2005). Globalisation, uncertainty and the early life course: A theoretical framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalisation, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Notten, N., Grunow, D., & Verbakel, E. (2017). Social policies and families in stress: Gender and educational differences in work–family conflict from a European perspective. Social Indicators Research, 132(3), 1281–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parreñas, R. (2005). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Russett, B., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy. New York, NY: Interdependence, and International Organizations.Google Scholar
  62. Saleem, H., Fatima, Z., Hadi, S. A., Nasir, A., & Riaz, M. (2015). Family in globalization era: A study on ICT. Explorer, 1(2), 29–33.Google Scholar
  63. Scheve, K., & Slaughter, M. J. (2004). Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D. J., & Millar, C. (2004). The impact of globalization on a country’s quality of life: Toward an integrated model. Social Indicator Research, 63(3), 251–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stiglitz, J. (2007). Making globalization work. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  66. Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trask, B. (2009). Globalization and families: Accelerated systemic social change. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Tsai, M. C. (2007). Does globalization affect human well-being? Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Valentine, G. (2006). Globalizing intimacy: The role of information and communication technologies in maintaining and creating relationships. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 34(1/2), 365–393.Google Scholar
  70. Whalley, J. (2005). Globalization and values. CESifo working paper series no. 1441.Google Scholar
  71. World Bank. (2015). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. World Values Survey. (2012). Online database. Available at http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.
  73. Yang, R., & Neal, A. G. (2006). The impact of globalization on family relations in China. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 32(1), 113–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsQuaid-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations