Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 1211–1224 | Cite as

Education Enrollment Level and Income Inequality: A Case of SAARC Economies

  • Noman Arshed
  • Awais Anwar
  • Nabeela Kousar
  • Samra Bukhari
Article
  • 386 Downloads

Abstract

This study is based on the idea that education forms a quadratic relationship with the income inequality. To evaluate it for South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries, this study uses the panel data from 1990 to 2015. Long run panel data necessitated the use of panel co-integration approach, followed up with fully modified OLS model to generate long-run coefficients. The results depict that initially primary and secondary enrollment increases inequality while tertiary enrollment decreases it. However, after a certain threshold level of enrollment (76% for primary, 42% for secondary and 7% for tertiary), their effect reverses. Thus, it makes inverted U shape for primary and secondary enrollment and U shape for tertiary enrollment. Hence education shows diminishing marginal return effect. Only the countries of India, Sri Lanka, Maldives and Nepal in SAARC economies have high enough education enrollments to cause a negative effect on income inequality.

Keywords

Education Income inequality DMR Panel co-integration Panel FMOLS 

JEL Classification

I24 O15 O53 

References

  1. Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976). Income distribution and development: Some stylized facts. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 128–135.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad, S. (2013). Humanistic economics needed to sustain society. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 1(4), 98–99.Google Scholar
  5. Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2002). Globalization and the great U-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries I. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1244–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anand, S., & Kanbur, S. R. (1993). The Kuznets process and the inequality—Development relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 40(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogeneous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S103–S125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study (No. w5698). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w5698.
  10. Barro, R. J. (1999). Inequality, growth, and investment (No. w7038). National bureau of economic research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7038.pdf.
  11. Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benabou, R. (1996). Inequality and growth. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 11, 11–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benoit, K. (2011). Linear regression models with logarithmic transformations. London School of Economics, 22(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  14. Bils, M., & Klenow, P. J. (2000). Does schooling cause growth? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1160–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brasington, D. M. (2002). Differences in the production of education across regions and urban and rural areas. Regional Studies, 36(2), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byanyima, W. (2017). 8 men have the same wealth as 3.6 billion of the world’s poorest people. We must rebalance the unjust economy. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2017. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/eight-men-have-the-same-wealth-as-3-6-billion-of-the-worlds-poorest-people-we-must-rebalance-this-unjust-economy/.
  17. Checchi, D. (2001). Education, inequality and income inequality. LSE STICERD Research Paper 52. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1094825.
  18. Chu, M. K. Y., Davoodi, M. H. R., & Gupta, M. S. (2000). Income distribution and tax and government social spending policies in developing countries (No. 0-62). Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  19. Collier, P., & Dollar, D. (2001). Can the world cut poverty in half? How policy reform and effective aid can meet international development goals. World Development, 29(11), 1787–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crenshaw, E. (1992). Cross-national determinants of income inequality: A replication and extension using ecological-evolutionary theory. Social Forces, 71(2), 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crenshaw, E., & Ameen, A. (1994). The distribution of income across national-populations: Testing multiple paradigms. Social Science Research, 23(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: Inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57(2), 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eberhardt, M. (2011). Panel time-series modeling: New tools for analyzing xt data. UK Stata User Group meeting, Cass Business School, London. Retrieved from http://www.timberlake.co.uk/media/pdf/proceedings/UK11_eberhardt.pdf.
  24. Fields, G. S. (1980). Education and income distribution in developing countries: A review of the literature. In T. King (Ed.), Education and income: A background study for world development (pp. 231–315). Washington, DC: The World Bank (electronic version).Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. Guildford: Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Gregorio, J. D., & Lee, J. W. (2002). Education and income inequality: New evidence from cross-country data. Review of Income and Wealth, 48(3), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. Ahmadabad: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  28. Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance, 3(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanif, N., & Arshed, N. (2016). Relationship between school education and economic growth: SAARC countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 294–300.Google Scholar
  30. Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hills, J. (2010). An anatomy of economic inequality in the UK-report of the National Equality Panel. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1546894.
  32. Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development* with a mathematical appendix. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels (No. 9526). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Kanwal, A., & Munir, K. (2015). The impact of educational and gender inequality on income inequality in South Asia. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66661/.
  35. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karim, M. R. (2015). Public education spending and income inequality in Bangladesh. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(1), 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuznets, S. (1956). Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: Level and variability of rates of growth. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 5(1), 5–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuznets, S. (1995). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic, 49, 1–28.Google Scholar
  39. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin, C. H. A. (2007). Education expansion, educational inequality, and income inequality: Evidence from Taiwan, 1976–2003. Social Indicators Research, 80(3), 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maass, C. D. (1996). South Asia: Drawn between cooperation and conflict. South Asian Survey, 3(1–2), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marin, A., & Psacharopoulos, G. (1976). Schooling and income distribution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 58(3), 332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 859–874.Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen, F. (1994). Income inequality and industrial development: Dualism revisited. American Sociological Review, 59(5), 654–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1997). The Kuznets curve and the great U-turn: Income inequality in US counties, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ostry, M. J. D., Berg, M. A., & Tsangarides, M. C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  49. Oxfam. (2017). An economy for the 99%. Oxfam Briefing Paper. Retrieved from https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-economy-for-99-percent-160117-en.pdf.
  50. Park, K. (1996). Educational expansion and educational inequality on income distribution. Economics of Education Review, 49, 411–437.Google Scholar
  51. Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, & R. C. Hill (Eds.), Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 93–130). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  52. Pedroni, P. (2008). Nonstationary panel data. Notes for IMF Course (not publically available).Google Scholar
  53. Phillips, P., & Hansen, B. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with l (1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ravallion, M. (2001). Growth, inequality and poverty: Looking beyond averages. World Development, 29(11), 1803–1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robinson, S. (1976). A note on the U hypothesis relating income inequality and economic development. The American Economic Review, 66(3), 437–440.Google Scholar
  56. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tselios, V. (2010). Inequalities in income and education and regional economic growth in Western Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(2), 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  58. Simpson, M. (1990). Political rights and income inequality: A cross-national test. American Sociological Review, 55(5), 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Solt, F. (2009). Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staff, O. E. C. D. (2009). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: Organization for Economic.Google Scholar
  62. Sylwester, K. (2002). Can education expenditures reduce income inequality? Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. WDI. (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS.
  64. Weede, E. (1993). The impact of democracy or repressiveness on the quality of life, income distribution and economic growth rates. International Sociology, 8(2), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noman Arshed
    • 1
  • Awais Anwar
    • 2
  • Nabeela Kousar
    • 3
  • Samra Bukhari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Management and TechnologyLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Center of Economic ResearchShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations