The Balanced Worth: A Procedure to Evaluate Performance in Terms of Ordered Attributes
- 150 Downloads
There are many problems in the social sciences that refer to the evaluation of the relative performance of some populations when their members’ achievements are described by a distribution of outcomes over a set of ordered categories. A new method for the evaluation of this type of problems is presented here. That method, called balanced worth, offers a cardinal, complete and transitive evaluation that is based on the likelihood of getting better results. The evaluation of each society is based on the probability of obtaining better results with respect to the others. The balanced worth is a refinement of “the worth” (Herrero and Villar in PLoS ONE 8(12):e84784, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084784) that overcomes its excessive sensitivity to the differences, due to the presence of ties. We also discuss how this method can be applied for the case of heterogeneous populations and show how it can be applied in different contexts. An empirical example, regarding life satisfaction in Spain is used to illustrate the working of this method.
KeywordsEvaluation method Categorical variables Relative group performance
Thanks are also due to Héctor García Peris, for his help in developing the algorithm that computes the evaluation, and to an anonymous referee for very helpful comments and suggestions. Funding was provided by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Grant Nos. ECO2015-65408-R, ECO2015-65820-P).
- Bellù, L. G., & Liberati, P. (2005). Social welfare analysis of income distributions ranking income distributions with crossing generalised Lorenz curves. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Border, K. C. (1989). Fixed point theorems with applications to economics and game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cuhadaroglu, T. (2013). My group beats your group: Evaluating non-income inequalities. St Andrews: W.P. School of Economics and Finances, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2015). Quality of life. Facts and views. Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970–1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(2), 640–666.Google Scholar
- Li, F., Yi, K., & Jestes, J. (2009). Ranking distributed probabilistic data. SIGMOD’09, June 29–July 2.Google Scholar
- Sheriff, G., & Maguire, K. (2013). Ranking distributions of environmental outcomes across population groups. National Center for Environmental Economics. August.Google Scholar
- Torregrosa, R. (2015). Medición y evolución del sentimiento autonómico en España. Investigaciones Regionales- Journal of Regional Research, 33, 53–70.Google Scholar
- Villar, A. (2014). Education and cognitive skills in the Spanish adult population. Intergenerational comparison of mathematical knowledge form PIAAC data. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(1), 72–88.Google Scholar