Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 1259–1277 | Cite as

American Househusbands: New Time Use Evidence of Gender Display, 2003–2016

  • Kamila Kolpashnikova
Original Research

Abstract

The traditional gendered division of household labor, where women did the bulk of all domestic labor, is eroding. The literature on housework, however, does not discuss the ways how to test for the non-traditional gender performances. Using the American Time Use Survey (2003–2016), the present study fills in this research gap and re-tests the relationship between relative earnings and the performance of housework. The analysis of women’s time spent on domestic work shows that the traditional gender display explanation still applies to women’s participation in routine tasks such as cooking and cleaning. Thus, breadwinning wives display gender neutralizing behavior and ‘do’ gender. On the other hand, American men show non-normative gender behavior in cooking and cleaning, but not in maintenance, where they still ‘do’ gender. This paper unveils a persistent traditional gender performance of women in housework and a new pattern for men’s involvement in indoor routine housework.

Keywords

Gender inequality in unpaid labor Gender Housework Gendered division of labor Gender display Doing gender 

References

  1. Artis, J. E., & Pavalko, E. K. (2003). Explaining the decline in women’s household labor: Individual change and cohort differences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, J., & Hewitt, B. (2013). Negotiating domestic labor: Women’s earnings and housework time in Australia. Feminist Economics, 19(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair, S. L., & Lichter, D. T. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives, the dynamics of married living. Marriage and family living (Vol. 23). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016a). American Time Use Survey, Washington, DC. http://www.bls.gov/tus/. Accessed August 15, 2016.
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016b). Regional and state employment and unemployment archived news releases. http://www.bls.gov/schedule/archives/laus_nr.htm#2003. Accessed September 9, 2016.
  11. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cooke, L. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 442–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darmon, A., & Drewnowski, N. (2008). Does social class predict diet quality? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87(5), 1107–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2013). Why study housework? Cleaning as a window into power in couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(2), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21(1), 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labour: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(5), 1272–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses. Language in Society, 5(3), 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg, A. E. (2013). “Doing” and “undoing” gender: The meaning and division of housework in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(2), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(May), 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, S. (2006). Her money, her time: Women’s earnings and their housework hours. Social Science Research, 35(4), 975–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartmann, H. I., & Reskin, B. F. (Eds.). (1986). Women’s work, men’s work: Sex segregation on the job. Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  24. Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3340976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofferth, S. L., & Casper, L. M. (2007). Handbook of measurement issues in family research. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hofferth, S. L., Flood, S. M., & Sobek, M. (2015). American Time Use Survey Data Extract System: Version 2.5 [machine-readable database]. College Park, MD: Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland and Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  27. Hook, J. L. (2004). Reconsidering the division of household labor: Incorporating volunteer work and informal support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. James, W. P., Nelson, M., Ralph, A., & Leather, S. (1997). Socioeconomic determinants of health. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. BMJ (Clinical Research Edition), 314(7093), 1545–1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kan, M. Y., & Pudney, S. (2008). Measurement error in stylized and diary data on time use. Sociological Methodology, 38(1), 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Killewald, A., & Gough, M. (2010). Money isn’t everything: Wives’ earnings and housework time. Social Science Research, 39(6), 987–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender & Society, 3(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, Y.-S., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(May), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lupton, D. (2000). “Where”s me dinner?’: Food preparation arrangements in rural Australian families. Journal of Sociology, 36, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marini, M. M., & Shelton, B. A. (1993). Measuring household work: Recent experience in the United States. Social Science Research, 22, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, A. J., & Carlson, D. L. (2016). Great expectations? Working- and middle-class cohabitors’ expected and actual divisions of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neuman, N., Gottzén, L., & Fjellström, C. (2015). Narratives of progress: Cooking and gender equality among Swedish men. Journal of Gender Studies, 9236(January), 1–13.Google Scholar
  37. Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59(3), 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, J. P. (1985). The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 33–62). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roth, J. (2016). Reading Current Population Survey (CPS) data with SAS, SPSS, or Stata. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/data/cps_progs.html. Accessed August 10, 2016.
  40. Scanzoni, J. (1980). Family decision-making: A developmental sex-role model. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Silver, H., & Goldscheider, F. (2013). Flexible work and housework: Work and family constraints on women’s domestic labor. Social Forces, 72(4), 1103–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sorensen, A., & McLanahan, S. (1987). Married women’s economic dependency, 1940–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 659–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Szabo, M. (2013). Foodwork or foodplay? Men’s domestic cooking, privilege and leisure. Sociology, 47, 623–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szabo, M. (2014). Men nurturing through food: Challenging gender dichotomies around domestic cooking. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(1), 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Hooff, J. H. (2011). Rationalising inequality: Heterosexual couples’ explanations and justifications for the division of housework along traditionally gendered lines. Journal of Gender Studies, 20(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society, 23(1), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Entrepreneurship and Business AdministrationAmerican University of Central AsiaBishkekKyrgyz Republic

Personalised recommendations