Social Indicators Research

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 875–905 | Cite as

Decomposing the Europe 2020 Index

  • Barnabé WalheerEmail author


Providing a reliable indicator of the progress of the European countries towards the achievement of the Europe 2020 objectives is crucial for policy makers. Recently, a composite index was suggested for this task. In this paper, we propose a decomposition of this composite index by distinguishing between three different components: country-, group-, and objective-specific indexes. The decomposition, while simple and consistent with previous works, allows us to better quantify, measure, and monitor the progress of the European countries towards the achievement of the Europe 2020 objectives. Our findings suggest that significant efforts are still required to reach the Europe 2020 objectives. The decomposition highlights important patterns for the three levels for each country.


Composite index Decomposition Europe 2020 


  1. Colak, M. S., & Ege, A. (2013). An assessment of EU 2020 strategy: Too far to reach? Social Indicators Research, 110, 659–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dijkstra, A. G., & Hanmer, L. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender inequality: Toward an alternative to the UNDP gender-related development index. Feminist Economics, 6(2), 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commissions.Google Scholar
  4. Freudenberg, M. (2003) Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 16.Google Scholar
  5. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Oree, V., & Hassen, S. Z. S. (2016). A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems. Applied Energy, 177, 683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pasimeni, P. (2012). Measuring Europe 2020: A new tool to assess the strategy. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4, 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pasimeni, P. (2013). The Europe 2020 index. Social Indicators Research, 110, 613–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pasimeni, F., & Pasimeni, P. (2016). An institutional analysis of the Europe 2020 strategy. Social Indicators Research, 127, 1021–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Plantenga, J., Remery, C., Figueiredo, H., & Smith, M. (2009). Towards a European Union gender equality index. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rappai, G. (2016). Europe en route to 2020: A new way of evaluating the overall fulfillment of the Europe 2020 strategic goals. Social Indicators Research, 129, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saltelli, A., D’Hombres, B., Jesinghaus, J., Manca, A., Mascherini, M., Nardo, M., et al. (2011). Indicators for EU policies. Business as usual? Social Indicators Research, 102, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. United Nations Development Programme. (2008). Human development report technical note 1: Calculating the human development indices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Zhou, L., Tokos, H., Krajnc, D., & Yang, Y. (2012). Sustainability performance evaluation in industry by composite sustainability index. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 14, 789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Business School SuzhouXi’An Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversitySuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations