Social Indicators Research

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 911–936 | Cite as

Quality of Work Life in Colombia: A Multidimensional Fuzzy Indicator

  • Mónica Sofía Gómez-Salcedo
  • Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte
  • Vicente Royuela
Article
  • 370 Downloads

Abstract

Quality of work (QoW) encompasses multiple objective and subjective dimensions, which may include labor income, job stability, job satisfaction, and social security. This paper follows the method proposed by Gómez-Salcedo et al. (2013) that introduces a new way of measuring QoW, which consists of (1) the use of Sen’s functioning and capabilities approach and (2) a fuzzy sets method to define membership to the sets of good job quality. Using the Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares, we obtain results at the national level about age, gender, educational level, firm size, and industry sector. The results are consistent with previous literature. One topic that is highlighted from our results is the existence of a “Quality of Work Life Cycle”, with higher levels of the index up to age 30, that may have critical implications for the social security system; people with lower quality jobs may not be contributing to health and pension funds, leaving many people without access to a retirement fund and implying more demands on the subsidized system to cover health expenses.

Keywords

Quality of work Fuzzy sets Labor market Colombia 

JEL Classification

J81 J89 J46 C02 

References

  1. Agovino, M., & Parodi, G. (2014). Identifying the quality of work by fuzzy sets theory: A comparison between disable and non-disabled workers. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1627–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arango, L. E., & Hamann, F. (Eds.). (2012). El mercado de trabajo en Colombia: hechos, tendencias e instituciones. Bogotá: Banco de la República.Google Scholar
  3. Bérenger, V., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: Standard of living and quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(7), 1259–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank, R. M. (1990). Are part-time jobs bad jobs? In G. Burtless (Ed.), A future of lousy jobs? The changing structure of U.S wages (pp. 123–164). Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.Google Scholar
  5. Bustamante, C. D., & Arroyo, S. (2008). La raza como determinante del acceso a un empleo de calidad: un estudio para Cali. Revista Ensayos sobre Política Económica, 26(57), 130–175.Google Scholar
  6. Cheli, B., & Lemmi, A. (1995). A “totally” fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes by Monte dei Paschi di Siena, 24(1), 115–134.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. E. (1996). Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(2), 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E. (2005). Your money or your life: Changing job quality in OECD countries. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davoine, L. (2006). Are quantity and quality of Jobs correlated? Using, interpreting and discussing the Laeken indicators. In Document de travail (p. 59). París: Centre d'études de l'Emploi.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, S., Nesheim, T., & Olsen, K. (2009). Quality of work–concept and measurement. Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe, REC-WP 05/2009.Google Scholar
  11. Desai, M., & Shah, A. (1988). An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty. Oxford Economic Papers, 40(3), 505–522.Google Scholar
  12. Dueñas, D., Iglesias, C., & Llorente, R. (2009). La Calidad del empleo en un contexto regional con especial referencia a la Comunidad de Madrid. Universidad de Alcalá. Serie Documentos de Trabajo, 05/2009, 1–36.Google Scholar
  13. Dupuis, G., Taillefer, M.-C., Etienne, A.-M., Fontaine, O., Boivin, O. S., & Von Turk, A. (2000). Measurement of quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation. In J. Jobin, F. Maltais, & P. Leblanc (Eds.), Advances in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (pp. 247–273). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Huneeus, F., Landerretche, O., & Puentes, E. (2012). Multidimensional measure of job quality persistence and heterogeneity in a developing country. Series Documentos de Trabajo, (357). Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
  15. Farné, S. (2003). Estudio sobre la calidad del empleo en Colombia. Resource document. OIT. http://white.oit.org.pe/osra/documentos/farne_dic9.pdf
  16. Farné, S., Vergara, C. A., & Baquero, N. (2011). La calidad del empleo en medio de la flexibilización laboral. Colombia 2002–2010. In Observatorio del mercado de trabajo y la seguridad social. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.Google Scholar
  17. Fernández, C. I., Heras, R. L., & Fernández, D. D. (2011). Calidad del empleo y satisfacción laboral en las regiones españolas.Un estudio con especial referencia a la Comunidad de Madrid. Investigaciones Regionales, 19, 25–49.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 135–141.Google Scholar
  19. Galvis-Aponte, L. A. (2012). Informalidad laboral en las áreas urbanas de Colombia. Coyuntura Económica: Investigación Económica y Social, XLII(1), 15–51.Google Scholar
  20. Gittleman, M. B., & Howell, D. R. (1995). Changes in the structure and quality of jobs in the United States: Effects by race and gender, 1973–1990. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 420–440.Google Scholar
  21. Gómez-Salcedo, M., Galvis-Aponte, L. A., & Aroca, P. (2013). Conmutación de larga distancia en Chile: el efecto de la calidad del empleo sobre la distancia y la probabilidad de conmutar [Mimeo]. Antofagasta: Universidad Católica del Norte.Google Scholar
  22. Gruenberg, B. (1980). The happy worker: An analysis of educational and occupational differences in determinants of jobs satisfaction. American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jencks, C., Pearlman, L., & Rainwater, L. (1988). What is a good job? A new measure of labor market success. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1322–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiménez, D. M., & Páez, J. N. (2014). Una metodología alternativa para medir la calidad del empleo en Colombia (2008–2012). Revista Sociedad y Economía, 27, 129–154.Google Scholar
  25. Kalleberg, A. L., & Marsden, P. V. (2012). Changing work values in the United States, 1973–2006. Social Science Research. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.012.Google Scholar
  26. Kohl, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1982). Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of reciprocal effects. American Journal of Sociology, 87(6), 1257–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lelli, S. (2001). Factor analysis vs. fuzzy sets theory: Assessing the influence of different techniques on Sen’s functioning approach. Discussions Paper Series (DPS), Department of Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
  28. Lemmi, A., & Betti, G. (2006). Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-0387-34249-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martel, J., & Dupuis, G. (2006). Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77(2), 333–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mora, J. J., & Ulloa, M. P. (2011). Calidad del Empleo en las principales ciudades Colombianas y endógeneidad de la educación. Revista de Economía Institucional, 13(25), 163–177.Google Scholar
  31. Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente, R. M., & Fernández-Macías, E. F. (2005). Job satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of work. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(5), 656–673.Google Scholar
  32. Observatorio del Mercado Laboral de Cartagena y Bolívar. (2013). La calidad del empleo en la ciudad de Cartagena 2007–2011. Red de Observatorios Regionales del Mercado de Trabajo, RED ORMET. Bogotá, Colombia: PNUD. ISBN 978-958-8736-46-4.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2013). Estudios económicos de la OCDE COLOMBIA Evaluación económica. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2014a). OECD employment outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/emple_outlook-2014-en.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. (2014b). Executive summary. OECD territorial reviews: Colombia 2014. Resource document. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264224551-3-en.Google Scholar
  37. OECD. (2015). OECD employment outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/emple_outlook-2015-en.Google Scholar
  38. Ortiz, C. H., & Uribe, J. I. (2006). Informalidad laboral en el área metropolitana de Cali 1992–1998. In J. I. Uribe (Ed.), Ensayos de economía aplicada al mercado laboral. Cali: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle. ISBN: 9789584400185.Google Scholar
  39. Ortiz, C., Uribe, J., Posso, C. M., & García, G. A. (2007). Exclusión social en el mercado laboral del Valle del Cauca: desempleo y calidad del empleo 2001–2006. Informe final para el PNUD (Desarrollo Humano para el Valle del Cauca).Google Scholar
  40. Pineda, J., & Acosta, C. (2011). Calidad del trabajo: Aproximaciones teóricas y estimación de un índice compuesto. Revista Ensayos sobre Política Económica, 29(65), 60–105.Google Scholar
  41. Posso, C. M. (2010). Calidad del empleo y segmentación laboral: un análisis para el mercado laboral Colombiano 2001–2006. Desarrollo y Sociedad, 65, 191–234.Google Scholar
  42. Quiñones, M. (2011). El índice de calidad del empleo, una propuesta alternativa aplicada a Colombia. In Documento de trabajo (p. 136). Cali, Colombia: de la Universidad del Valle.Google Scholar
  43. Ritter, J. A. (2005). Patterns of job quality attributes in the European Union. Working Paper, 51. ILO.Google Scholar
  44. Rogerson, R. J. (1997). Quality of life in Britain. Glasgow: Quality of Life Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Strahclyde.Google Scholar
  45. Rosenthal, N. H. (1989). More than wages at issue in job quality debate. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 4–8.Google Scholar
  46. Royuela, V., Lopez-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2008). The Institutional vs. the academic definition of the quality of work life. What is the focus of the European commission? Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Royuela, V., Lopez-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2009). Results of a quality of work life index in Spain. A comparison of survey results and aggregate social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Royuela, V., & Suriñach, J. (2012). Quality of work and aggregate productivity. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen, A. K. (1999). Desarrollo y Libertad. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
  50. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Turcotte, P. R. (1988). QVT: La Qualite de Vie au Travail: Une Voie vers l’Excellence. Montreal: Agence d’ARC.Google Scholar
  52. Zimmermann, H. J., & Zysno, P. (1983). Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10(1), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mónica Sofía Gómez-Salcedo
    • 1
  • Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte
    • 2
  • Vicente Royuela
    • 3
  1. 1.Observatorio del Caribe ColombianoCartagenaColombia
  2. 2.Centro de Estudios Económicos Regionales-CEERBanco de la RepúblicaCartagenaColombia
  3. 3.AQR-IREA Research GroupUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations