Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–20 | Cite as

Are Traditional, Negative Gender Attitudes Associated with Violent Attitudes toward Women? Insights from a New, Culturally Adapted Measure in India

  • Sanjay SinghEmail author
  • Yogita Aggarwal
Original Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

We conducted four focus group discussions followed by three studies to develop and validate a scale for measuring traditional attitudes toward women in Indian society. Study 1 (n = 592) yielded four factors (i.e., Perceived Feminine Frivolity and Selfishness; Extra-Familial Patriarchal Attitudes; Within-Family Patriarchal Attitudes; Perceived Feminine Weakness) underlying traditional negative attitudes toward women in Indian society. In Study 2 (n = 250), a four-factor reflective model offered a comparatively better model fit and robust psychometric properties for the proposed scale. Study 3 (n = 343) showed that the proposed measure (the Traditional Attitudes toward Indian Women scale; TAIW) explains a significantly greater amount of variance in violent attitudes toward women as compared to a scale standardized in other cultures, demonstrating the predictive relevance of the scale. Decoding the complex relationship between culture and gender-based violence, our measure establishes a clear link between traditional gender and violent attitudes toward women both among male and female participants. We discuss the implication of our findings for policy, research, professional practice, and psychological intervention to create a more inclusive and egalitarian social experience for women.

Keywords

Attitudes Culture Gender India Violence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help of two Research Assistants, Aparna Gakhar and Ganga Tiwari, for their assistance during the research process and fieldwork.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest. All the research participants were treated as per the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and 1964 Helsinki declaration and its subsequent amendments. Informed consent from all the research participants was taken.

Supplementary material

11199_2019_1102_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Abdalla, I. A. (1996). Attitudes towards women in the Arabian gulf region. Women in Management Review, 11(1), 29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429610109271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, L. (2002). Bhai-behen, true love, time pass: Friendships and sexual partnerships among youth in an Indian metropolis. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 4(3), 337–353.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050110120794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aggarwal, Y., & Singh, S. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of work significance in Indian organizations. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(4), 318–342.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2017.1320580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Delhi: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Ajzen, I., & Sexton, J. (1999). Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behaviour correspondence. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 117–140). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Amirtham, M. (2011). Women in India: Negotiating body, reclaiming agency. Eugene: Resource Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Anitha, S., Yalamarty, H., & Roy, A. (2018). Changing nature and emerging patterns of domestic violence in global contexts: Dowry abuse and the transnational abandonment of wives in India. Women’s Studies International Forum, 69, 67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arminger, G., Clogg, C. C., & Sobel, M. E. (1995). Specification and estimation of mean and covariance-structure models. In G. Arminger, M. E. S. Clifford, & C. Clogg (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 185–250). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., … Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Babu, G. R., & Babu, B. V. (2011). Dowry deaths: A neglected public health issue in India. International Health, 3(1), 35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inhe.2010.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Babu, B. V., & Kar, S. K. (2009). Domestic violence against women in eastern India: A population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health, 9(129), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Banaji, M., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 353–393). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Beere, C., King, D., Beere, D., & King, L. (1984). The sex-role egalitarianism scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles, 10(7–8), 563–576.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernstein, D. A. (2016). Psychology: Foundations and frontiers. Boston: Cengage.Google Scholar
  17. Bhatia, S. K., & Chaudhary, P. (2003). Managing cultural diversity in globalization: Key to business success of global managers - insights and strategies. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Botta, D., Nimbi, F. M., Tripodi, F., Silvaggi, M., & Simonelli, C. (2019). Are role and gender related to sexual function and satisfaction in men and women practicing BDSM? The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(3), 463–473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brandwein, R. A., Brown, C. A., & Fox, E. M. (1974). Women and children last: The social situation of divorced mothers and their families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36(3), 498–514.  https://doi.org/10.2307/350721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Branscombe, N. R., & Baron, R. A. (2017). Social psychology (Global ed.). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  21. Brinol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2012). A history of attitudes and persuasion research. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 283–320). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chia, R. C., Moore, J. L., Lam, K. N., Chuang, C. J., & Cheng, B. S. (1994). Cultural differences in gender role attitudes between Chinese and American students. Sex Roles, 31(1–2), 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Costello, A. B., & Osbourne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. Retrieved from https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10%26n=7. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
  27. Courtney, M. R. (2013). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA : Using the SPSS R-menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(8), 1–14. Retrieved from https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=18&n=8. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
  28. Datta, R. (2017). Contemporary India. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Delevi, R., & Bugay, A. (2013). Assessing reliability and validity of the 15-item short version of the attitudes toward women scale (AWS) among Turkish students. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 14(1), 263–272. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/41f9/f45ea4c1e35b489112e414516511dd834ecc.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
  30. Duiker, W. J., & Spielvogel, J. J. (2016). The essential world history. Volume I: To 1800 (8th ed.). Boston: Cengage.Google Scholar
  31. Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38(9), 971–981.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.9.971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108(448), 726–735.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Edwards, A. L. (1983). Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. FAO. (2017). FAO in India. Retrieved July 28, 2017 from http://www.fao.org/india/fao-in-india/india-at-a-glance/en/.
  36. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Financial Express. (2017) With an average age of 29,India will be the world’s youngest country by 2020. Retrieved from https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/with-an-average-age-of-29-india-will-be-the-worlds-youngest-country-by-2020/603435/. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
  38. Flood, M. (2014). Measures for the assessment of dimensions of violence against women: A compendium. Retrieved April 11, 2017 from http://www.svri.org/research-methods/tools-and-questionnaires/victimisation?link-section=victimisation.
  39. Gaskin, J., & Lim, J. (2016). Master validity tool: AMOS plugin. Retrieved October 20, 2019 from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title=Plugins. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.
  40. Ghai, A. (2002). Disabled women: An excluded agenda of Indian feminism. Hypatia, 17(3), 49–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00941.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gibbons, J. L., Hamby, B. A., & Dennis, W. D. (1997). Researching gender-role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 151–170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00106.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gotz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2010). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 691–712). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Delhi: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  46. Gupta, M. D., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., & Zhenming, X. (2014). Why is son preference so persistent in east and South Asia ? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331293807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guzder, J., & Krishna, M. (1991). Sita-Shakti: Cultural paradigms for Indian women. Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review, 28(4), 257–301.  https://doi.org/10.1177/136346159102800401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hage, M. (2017). Edexcel A-level business student guide: Theme 4 - global business. Banbury: Hachette.Google Scholar
  49. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Delhi: Pearson.Google Scholar
  50. Haladyna, T. (2012). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hill, S., & Marshall, T. C. (2018). Beliefs about sexual assault in India and Britain are explained by attitudes toward women and hostile sexism. Sex Roles, 79(7–8), 421–430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0880-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jensen, P., Krogsgaard, M. R., Christiansen, J., Brændstrup, O., Johansen, A., & Olsen, J. (1995). Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 38(2), 195–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jha, M. K. (2014). Technology for revolution: Opportunity for a new religion and a new society. Delhi: Nayee Kitaab.Google Scholar
  56. Kakar, S. (2001). The essential writings of Sudhir Kakar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kalra, G., & Bhugra, D. (2013). Sexual violence against women: Understanding cross-cultural intersections. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(3), 244–249.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.117139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Kamdar, Z. N., Kosambiya, J. K., Chawada, B. L., Verma, M., & Kadia, A. (2017). Rape: Is it a lifestyle or behavioral problem? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 59(1), 77–82.  https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_78_16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kohno, M., & Nishizawa, Y. (2016). Electoral survey methodology: Insight from Japan on using computer assisted personal interviews. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Koski, A. D., Stephenson, R., & Koenig, M. R. (2011). Physical violence by partner during pregnancy and use of prenatal care in rural India. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 29(3), 245–254.  https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v29i3.7872.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Kramarae, C., & Spender, D. (2000). Routledge international encyclopedia of women: Global women’s issues and knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Kuhn, P. (2000). Canada and the OECD hypothesis: Does labour market inflexibility explain Canada’s high level of unemployment? In W. C. Riddell & F. St-Hilaire (Eds.), Adapting public policy to a labour market in transition (pp. 177–202). Montreal: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
  64. Lal, M., & Gokhale, N. (2009). In search of Sita: Revisiting mythology. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  65. Lallmahomed, M. I., Rahim, N. R., Ibrahim, R., & Rahman, A. A. (2013). A preliminary classification of usage measures in informtion system acceptance: A Q-Sort approach. In A. H. S. Zolait (Ed.), Technology diffusion and adoption: Global complexity, global innovation (pp. 105–129). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ledesma, R. D., & Valero-Mora, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(2), 2–11. Retrieved from https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=2. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
  67. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Factor analysis in personality research. In R. F. K. Richard, W. Robins, & R. Chris Fraley (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 424–443). London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  68. Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Lipman-Blumen, J. (1989). Female leadership in formal organizations: Must the female leadership go formal? In H. J. Leavitt, L. R. Pondy, & D. M. Boje (Eds.), Readings in managerial psychology (4th ed., pp. 325–345). London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  70. Maertens, A. (2013). Social norms and aspirations: Age of marriage and education in rural India. World Development, 47, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Maithreyi, K. (1991). Women and science: Selected essays. Delhi: Himalaya Publishing House.Google Scholar
  72. Mallik, R. (2002). Sex selection: A gender-based preference for a pregnancy. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 189–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00031-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Mann, B. (2006). Women’s liberation and the sublime: Feminism, postmodernism, environment. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Maslow, A. H. (2012). A theory of human motivation. New York: Start Publishing.Google Scholar
  75. McAndrew, F. (2014). The “sword of a woman”: Gossip and female aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 196–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 247–255.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McDuff, D., Kodra, E., Kaliouby, R., & LaFrance, M. (2017). A large-scale analysis of sex differences in facial expressions. PLoS One, 12(4), e0173942.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.  https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Megens, K. C. I. M., & Weerman, F. M. (2010). Attitudes, delinquency and peers: The role of social norms in attitude-behaviour inconsistency. European Journal of Criminology, 7(4), 299–316.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810365023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2016). Participation in economy. In Social Statistics Division (Ed.), Women and men in India (pp. 57–84). Government of India: Delhi. Retrieved from http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/reports_and_publication/statistical_publication/social_statistics/WM16Chapter4.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2019.
  81. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2018). Women and men in India. Retrieved August 31, 2019 from http://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/WomenandMeninIndia2018.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2019.
  82. Mohanty, M. (2004). Class, caste, gender. Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  83. Morrison, M., & Morrison, T. (2003). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v43n02_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nath, D. (2000). Gently shattering the glass ceiling: Experiences of Indian women managers. Women in Management Review, 15(1), 44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420010310191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. National Crime Records Bureau of India. (2015). Crime in India: 2015 statistics. Retrieved from http://ncrb.gov.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2015/FILES/CrimeInIndia2015.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2018.
  86. National Crime Records Bureau of India. (2016). Crime in India 2016 - Statistics. Retrieved from http://ncrb.gov.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2016/pdfs/NEWPDFs/CrimeinIndia-2016Complete PDF291117.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2019.
  87. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nijhawan, A. (2009). Excusing the female dancer: Tradition and transgression in Bollywood dancing. South Asian Popular Culture, 7(2), 99–112.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14746680902920841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  90. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32(3), 396–402.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. OECD. (2014). Violence against women (indicator). Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/inequality/violence-against-women.htm. Accessed 18 Dec 2018.
  92. Oomman, N., & Ganatra, B. R. (2002). Sex selection: The systematic elimination of girls. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 184–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00029-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Atlas of gender and development: How social norms affect gender equality in non-OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  94. Owojuyigbe, M., Bolorunduro, M.-E., & Busari, D. (2017). Female genital mutilation as sexual disability: Perceptions of women and their spouses in Akure, Ondo state, Nigeria. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(50), 80–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1331685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Patai, D. (1984). The Orwell mystique: A study in male ideology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  96. Pati, R. N. (2003). Socio-cultural dimensions of reproductive child health. Delhi: APH Publishing.Google Scholar
  97. Patton, T. O. (2006). Hey girl, am I more than my hair?: African American women and their struggles with beauty, body image, and hair. NWSA Journal, 18(2), 24–51 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4317206. Accessed 11 Jan 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320(7227), 114–116.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. Prakash, O. (2005). Cultural history of India. Delhi: New Age International Publishers.Google Scholar
  101. Press Trust of India. (2019, May 31). India’s per-capita income rises 10% to Rs 10,534 a month in FY19. Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/indias-per-capita-income-rises-10-to-rs-10534-a-month-in-fy19/articleshow/69601770.cms. Accessed 28 Sept 2019.
  102. Ramanamma, A., & Bambawale, U. (1980). The mania for sons: An analysis of social values in South Asia. Social Science & Medicine. Part B: Medical Anthropology, 14(2), 107–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7987(80)90059-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Saxena, M., Geiselman, T. A., & Zhang, S. (2019). Workplace incivility against women in STEM: Insights and best practices. Business Horizons.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Schriesheim, C. A., & Hill, K. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(4), 1101–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sharda, S. (2011, April 5). Girls worshipped but not welcomed. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Girls-worshipped-but-not-welcomed/articleshow/7870176.cms.
  106. Sharma, I. (2015). Violence against women: Where are the solutions? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(2), 131–139.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.158133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. Shweder, R. (2003). Why do men barbecue?: Recipes for cultural psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Ṣiddiqui, M. I. (2004). Women workers. Delhi: Anamika Publishers.Google Scholar
  109. Singh, M. (2014, October 13). 64% of urban Indian women busy with housework, study reveals. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/64-of-urban-Indian-women-busy-with-housework-study-reveals/articleshow/44796358.cms. Accessed 19 May 2019.
  110. Singh, S., & Aggarwal, Y. (2018). Happiness at Work Scale: Construction and psychometric validation of a measure using mixed method approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(5), 1439–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9882-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Smith, E. R., Mackie, D. M., & Claypool, H. M. (2014). Social psychology (4th ed.). London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Solomon, S., Kumarasamy, N., Ganesh, A. K., & Amalraj, R. E. (1998). Prevalence and risk factors of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection in urban and rural areas in Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 9(2), 98–103.  https://doi.org/10.1258/0956462981921756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Spence, J., & Hahn, E. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 17–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00098.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2(4), 219–220.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Stöckl, H., March, L., Pallitto, C., Garcia-Moreno, C., & WHO Multi-country Study Team. (2014). Intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: Prevalence and associated factors in nine countries - a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14(751), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Ta, N., Cheng, G., Zhang, D., Jia, Y., Ding, F., & Xia, M. (2017). Women’s gender roles affect their visual interest in different infant facial expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 109–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2017.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women, 1970–1995: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 35–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00099.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Varghese, L. M. (2015). A land of one’s own: Women and land rights in literature and society. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  119. Ved. (2013). The shrouded satanism in feudal languages: Tribulations and intractability of improving others. Delhi: Victoria Institutions.Google Scholar
  120. Visaria, L., & Ved, R. R. (2016). India’s family planning programme: Policies, practices and challenges. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  121. Wang, J. (2014). Globalization of leadership development: An empirical study of impact on German and Chinese managers. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  122. Ward, C. (1988). The Attitudes Toward Rape Victims Scale: Construction, validation, and cross-cultural applicability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12(2), 127–146.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00932.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Weber, L. (2011). Life choices: The teachings of abortion. Boulder: Sentient Publications.Google Scholar
  124. Wickrama, K. A. S., Lee, T. K., O’Neal, C. W., & Lorenz, F. O. (2016). Higher-order growth curves and mixture modeling with Mplus: A practical guide. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. World Bank. (2016). Female labour force. Retrieved July 29, 2017 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.TOTL.FE.ZS.
  126. Yano, C. R. (2006). Crowning the nice girl: Gender, ethnicity, and culture in Hawaii’s cherry blossom festival. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  127. Yoder, J. D. (2013). Women and gender: Making a difference (4th ed.). New York: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
  128. Yoder, J. D., Rice, R. W., Adams, J., Priest, R. F., & Prince, H. T. (1982). Reliability of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS) and the personal attributes questionnaire (PAQ). Sex Roles, 8(6), 651–657.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementIndian Institute of Management SirmaurPaonta SahibIndia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations