Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–8 | Cite as

SKIPing Together: A Motor Competence Intervention Promotes Gender-Integrated Friendships for Young Children

  • Kelly Lynn MulveyEmail author
  • Sally Taunton Miedema
  • Alexandra Stribing
  • Emily Gilbert
  • Ali Brian
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Young children typically report primarily same-gender friendships across childhood. However, there is growing awareness of the benefits of gender-integrated friendships and gender integration in schools, especially for social-emotional domains. The current study tested whether Successful Kinesthetic Instruction for Preschoolers (SKIP), an evidence-based motor competence intervention led by physical education teachers, promotes gender-integrated friendships in preschool-aged children. Results documented that children (Mage = 47.38, SD = 6.21 months, range = 36.67–60.25 months) assigned to the SKIP condition (n = 56) as compared to a control free-play condition (n = 37) showed higher motor skill competence and were more likely to report gender-integrated friendships post intervention. Growth in girls’ reports of gender-integrated friendships, in particular, drove the intervention effect on gender-integrated friendships. These findings highlight one example of how motor competence interventions can also result in benefits in social-emotional domains.

Keywords

Motor development Gender integration Friendships Cross-group Intergroup relations Preschool 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This research was conducted with IRB approval from the University of South Carolina and all participants assented to participant and had signed parental consent.

Conflict of Interest

We declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Bardid, F., Deconinck, F. J., Descamps, S., Verhoeven, L., De Pooter, G., Lenoir, M., & D’Hondt, E. (2013). The effectiveness of a fundamental motor skill intervention in pre-schoolers with motor problems depends on gender but not environmental context. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4571–4581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children's gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66, 1072–1087.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brian, A., Goodway, J. D., Logan, J., & Sutherland, S. (2017a). Skiping with teachers: An early years motor skill intervention. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22, 270–282.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1176133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brian, A., Goodway, J. D., Logan, J. A., & Sutherland, S. (2017b). Skiping with head start teachers: Influence of t-skip on object control skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, advance online publication., 88, 479–491.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1375077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, C. S. (2013). Legal issues surrounding single-sex schools in the u.S.: Trends, court cases, and conflicting laws. Sex Roles, 69, 356–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0001-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, A., Piek, J. P., & Dyck, M. J. (2005). Motor coordination, empathy, and social behaviour in school-aged children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 437–442.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S001216220500085X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunbar, R. R., & O’Sullivan, M. M. (1986). Effects of intervention on differential treatment of boys and girls in elementary physical education lessons. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fabes, R. A., Pahlke, E., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2013). Gender-segregated schooling and gender stereotyping. Educational Studies, 39, 315–319.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.760442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., Hanish, L. D., & DeLay, D. (2018). Gender integration in coeducational classrooms: Advancing educational research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field, R., Martin, C., Andrews, N., England, D. E., & Zosuls, K. M. (2017). The influence of gender-based relationship efficacy on attitudes toward school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 63, 396–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glassman, M. (2000). Adult and peer social interactions during preschool activity: A combination for gender segregation? Early Child Development and Care, 165, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443001650101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goble, P., Martin, C. L., Hanish, L. D., & Fabes, R. A. (2012). Children’s gender-typed activity choices across preschool social contexts. Sex Roles, 67, 435–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0176-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodway, J. D., & Branta, C. F. (2003). Influence of a motor skill intervention on fundamental motor skill development of disadvantaged preschool children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodway, J. D., Robinson, L. E., & Crowe, H. (2010). Gender differences in fundamental motor skill development in disadvantaged preschoolers from two geographical regions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halim, M. L., Ruble, D., Tamis-LeMonda, C., & Shrout, P. E. (2013). Rigidity in gender-typed behaviors in early childhood: A longitudinal study of ethnic minority children. Child Development, 84, 1269–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanish, L. D., DeLay, D., Martin, C. L., Lecheile, B., Goble, P., Fabes, R. A., … Cook, R. (2018). Building relationships: Effects of a teacher-directed peer pairing intervention on children’s interactions with classmates (Unpublished manuscript). Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  19. Keener, E., Mehta, C., & Strough, J. (2013). Should educators and parents encourage other-gender interactions? Gender segregation and sexism. Gender and Education, 25, 818–833.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.845648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindsey, E. W. (2012). Girl's and boy's play form preferences and gender segregation in early childhood. In S. P. McGeown (Ed.), Psychology of gender differences (pp. 11–24). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Lindsey, E. W., & Colwell, M. J. (2013). Pretend and physical play: Links to preschoolers' affective social competence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59, 330–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livesey, D., Mow, M. L., Toshack, T., & Zheng, Y. (2011). The relationship between motor performance and peer relations in 9- to 12-year-old children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37, 581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01183.x.Google Scholar
  23. Maccoby, E. E. (1988). Gender as a social category. Developmental Psychology, 24, 755–765.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group process: A developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 54–58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macdonald, D. (1990). The relationship between the sex composition of physical education classes and teacher/pupil verbal interaction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children's search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 67–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L., Leonard, S., & Dinella, L. M. (2011). Experienced and expected similarity to same-gender peers: Moving toward a comprehensive model of gender segregation. Sex Roles, 65, 421–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0029-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, C. L., DiDonato, M. D., Clary, L., Fabes, R. A., Kreiger, T., Palermo, F., & Hanish, L. (2012). Preschool children with gender normative and gender non-normative peer preferences: Psychosocial and environmental correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 831–847.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9950-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, C. L., Kornienko, O., Schaefer, D. R., Hanish, L. D., Fabes, R. A., & Goble, P. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children's peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Development, 84, 921–937.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulvey, K. L., Taunton, S., Pennell, A., & Brian, A. (2018). Head, toes, knees, skip! Improving preschool children's executive function through a motor competence intervention. Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology, 40, 233–239.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2018-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicaise, V., Bois, J. E., Fairclough, S. J., Amorose, A. J., & Cogérino, G. (2007). Girls' and boys' perceptions of physical education teachers' feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 915–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in k-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Education Research, 78, 33–84.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piek, J. P., Bradbury, G. S., Elsley, S. C., & Tate, L. (2008). Motor coordination and social–emotional behaviour in preschool-aged children. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55, 143–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120802033592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piek, J. P., Barrett, N. C., Smith, L. M., Rigoli, D., & Gasson, N. (2010). Do motor skills in infancy and early childhood predict anxious and depressive symptomatology at school age? Human Movement Science, 29, 777–786.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Serbin, L. A., Tonick, I. J., & Sternglanz, S. H. (1977). Shaping cooperative cross-sex play. Child Development, 48, 924–929.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1128342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Serbin, L. A., Conner, J. M., Burchardt, C. J., & Citron, C. C. (1979). Effects of peer presence on sex-typing of children’s play behaviour. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smyth, M. M., & Anderson, H. I. (2000). Coping with clumsiness in the school playground: Social and physical play in children with coordination impairments. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 389–413.  https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Solomons, H. H. (1977). Sex-role-mediated achievement behaviours and interpersonal dynamics of fifth-grade coeducational physical education classes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 5445A.Google Scholar
  41. Sylvestre, A., Nadeau, L., Charron, L., Larose, N., & Lepage, C. (2013). Social participation by children with developmental coordination disorder compared to their peers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 1814–1820.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.756943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taunton, S. A., Brian, A., & True, L. (2017). Universally designed motor skill intervention for children with and without disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29, 941–954.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9565-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of gross motor development second edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  44. Veiga, G., de Leng, W., Cachucho, R., Ketelaar, L., Kok, J. N., Knobbe, A., . . . Rieffe, C. (2016). Social competence at the playground: Preschoolers during recess. Infant and Child Development, 26, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1957.
  45. Zosuls, K. M., Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., Miller, C. F., Gaertner, B. M., England, D. E., & Hill, A. P. (2011). ‘It’s not that we hate you’: Understanding children’s gender attitudes and expectancies about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 288–304.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02023.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physical EducationUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations