Gender Typicality of Faces Affects Children’s Categorization and Judgments of Women More than of Men
- 45 Downloads
Most infants display more perceptual knowledge of female than male faces, which is related to their predominant experience with women. If disparities in social experience persist beyond infancy, children should have a better developed sense of what typifies female than male faces. Gender typicality of faces should therefore more often impact their cognitive decisions for female than male targets. To test this possibility, we assessed U.S. 5- to 9-year-olds’ (n = 81) responses when making similarity judgments, spontaneous gender references, and typicality decisions for female and male targets whose faces were gender typical or atypical. Parental reports confirmed most children had predominant experience with female caregivers. Consistent with predictions, gender typicality of faces differentially influenced children’s similarity and typicality judgments for female, but not male, targets. It did not influence their spontaneous gender references, perhaps due to the task being more cognitively demanding. Results show children more reliably detect the gender typicality of female than male faces, which affects their social groupings and decisions about what constitutes a good example of a face more so for female than male targets. Findings might help explain the origins of women being judged by their facial appearance more so than men. Moreover, high feminine-looking women seem to elicit the female category more than low feminine-looking women do, which could elicit greater gender-role expectations for women with high feminine faces.
KeywordsSocial cognition Classification Judgment Face perception Physical appearance
Portions of the present data were presented at the March 2016 Society for Research in Human Development in Denver, CO. This research was supported by a UNLV Graduate College Faculty Doctoral Graduate Research Assistant Award and, in part, by a grant from the National Science Foundation (BCS-1148049).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
These data are not under consideration for publication elsewhere nor have these data been published previously. There are no conflicts of interest that might have influenced the research. The University of Nevada, Las Vegas Social and Behavioral Sciences Internal Review Board approved this study and treatment of subjects was in accordance with the ethical standards of APA.
- Cristofaro, T. N., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2008). Lessons in mother-child and father-child personal narratives in Latino families. In A. McCabe, A. Bailey, & G. Melzi (Eds.), Spanish-language narration and literacy: Culture, cognition, and emotion (pp. 54–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). The peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.Google Scholar
- Farkas, L. G. (1981). Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Farkas, L. G., & Munro, I. R. (1987). Anthropometric facial proportions in Medicine. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
- Kayl, A. J. (2012). Do toddlers exhibit same-sex preferences for adult facial stimuli? (Master’s thesis). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. Paper 1676. Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/1676/.
- Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), 1–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2010). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc. (2011). SAS/STAT® 9.3 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- Saxton, T. K., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2011). A longitudinal study of adolescents’ judgments of the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.9.2011.22.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Short, L. A., Hatry, A. J., & Mondloch, C. J. (2011). The development of norm-based coding and race-specific face prototypes: An examination of 5- and 8-year-olds’ face space. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strauss, M. S., Newell, L. C., Best, C. A., Hannigen, S. F., Gastgeb, H. Z., & Giovannelli, J. L. (2012). The development of facial gender categorization in individuals with and without autism: The impact of typicality. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1847–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1428-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2011–12). Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), Public School Teacher Data File. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/sass1112_2013314_t1s_002.asp.
- Wild, H. A., Barrett, S. E., Spence, M. J., O’Toole, A. J., Cheng, Y. D., & Brooke, J. (2000). Recognition and sex categorization of adults’ and children’s faces: Examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar