What about the Male Victims? Exploring the Impact of Gender Stereotyping on Implicit Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions Associated with Intimate Partner Violence
- 1.1k Downloads
Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is considered stereotypically as a gendered phenomenon, empirical evidence contradicts such gender asymmetry in reported rates of victimisation and perpetration. The current research explored the impact of stereotype priming on implicit attitudes associated with IPV victimisation (Study 1) and perpetration (Study 2), and further examined behavioural intentions associated with hypothetical gendered scenarios of IPV. Participants recruited in the United Kingdom were primed with either stereotype congruent, incongruent or no information about IPV victimisation (Study 1, n = 122) or perpetration rates (Study 2, n = 101). They then completed an Implicit Association Test and reported their subjective norms, self-efficacy, behavioural intentions, and outcome expectancies pertaining to different scenarios depicting gendered IPV. Findings indicate that priming an incongruent stereotype did not impact significantly on implicit or explicit attitudes toward IPV. Gendered scenarios were found to be influential on explicit attitudes, with IPV less likely to be identified toward male victims and considered more acceptable compared to when the victim was female. Moreover, individuals reported feeling more capable and likely to intervene in an act of IPV when the victim was female compared to male, were more likely to report such an incident, and anticipated greater outcomes. These findings highlight the need for an inclusive research approach that recognises men’s victimisation.
KeywordsIntimate partner violence Stereotypes Implicit association test Gender Behavioural intentions Domestic violence
Compliance with Ethical Standards
We confirm that the research protocol adheres to BPS and APA ethical guidelines. We do not see any potential conflicts of interests, we have adhered to ethical guidelines from our individual institutions as well as our professional bodies. We also sought and gained informed consent from participants.
- Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. l–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.Google Scholar
- Bates, E. A. (2017, November). Hidden victims: Men and their experiences of domestic violence. Paper presented at ManKind initiative conference, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Bates, E. A. (2018). Contexts for women’s aggression against men. In: T. Shackelford, V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_901-1.
- Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., & Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297–311.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta: Author.Google Scholar
- de Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2006). Impact of transport pricing on quality of life, acceptability, and intentions to reduce car use: An exploratory study in five European countries. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(6), 463–470.Google Scholar
- Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–40). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
- Dutton, D. (2006). The gender debate and the feminist paradigm. In D. G. Dutton (Ed.), Rethinking domestic violence (pp. 109–129). Vancouver: UBS Press.Google Scholar
- Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Hogan, K. (2016). Mens experiences of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence: A qualitative exploration (unpublished thesis). University of the West of England. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/28618.
- Ialongo, C. (2017). The logic of equivalence testing and its use in laboratory medicine. Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica, 27(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
- Kindermann, H. (2017). Priming and context effects of banner ads on consumer based brand equity: A pilot study. In F. H. Nah & C. H. Tan (Eds.), HCI in business, government and organizations. Supporting business. HCIBGO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10294). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-58484-3_5#citeas. Accessed 15 May 2018.
- Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S., Cerruti, C., Shin, J. E., Joy-Gaba, J., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765–1785.Google Scholar
- Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362.Google Scholar
- Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T. A., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. L. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3, 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-65188.8.131.52.Google Scholar
- Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x.Google Scholar
- Macrae, C. N., Stangor, C., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Stereotypes and stereotyping. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, R. J., Hartnett, J. L., Header, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Wood, S. E., Nichols, A. L., … Walker, W. R. (2018). An investigation of abstract construal on impression formation: A multi-lab replication of McCarthy and Skowronski (2011). International Review of Social Psychology, 31, 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.133.
- Nelson, T. D. (2009). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., ... Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597.Google Scholar
- Office for National Statistics. (2015). Chapter 4: Violent crime and sexual offences- Intimate personal violence and serious sexual assault. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_394500.pdf.
- Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., Marche, A. L., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6.Google Scholar
- Terry, D. J., & O’Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01058.x.Google Scholar
- Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.Google Scholar
- Welch, W. W., & Barlau, A. N. (2013). Addressing survey nonresponse issues: Implications for ATE principal investigators, evaluators, and researchers. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/decaproject/pubs/Survey%20nonresponse%20issues%20Implications%20for%20ATE%20PIs%20researchers%20%20evaluators.pdf.
- Whitaker, D. J., Haileyesus, T., Swahn, M., & Saltzman, L. S. (2007). Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 941–947. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020.Google Scholar