Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Feeling Powerful but Incompetent: Fear of Negative Evaluation Predicts Men’s Sexual Harassment of Subordinates

  • Leah R. Halper
  • Kimberly Rios
Original Article

Abstract

Although research has examined the role of power in men’s likelihood of perpetrating sexual harassment against women, less is known about specific personality traits that might predict sexual harassment. Building upon theorizing that men are especially prone to engage in sexual harassment to the extent that their social status is threatened (Berdahl 2007a), we conducted three studies with samples of adults (Studies 1 and 3) and college students (Study 2). In Studies 1 and 3, we asked participants to indicate their likelihood of engaging in sexual harassment of subordinates across a variety of scenarios. In Study 2, we experimentally primed power and had participants choose to send either neutral or sexuality-related articles to an ostensibly real female participant. Results demonstrated that concerns about being perceived as incompetent (i.e., Fear of Negative Evaluation scores) positively predicted men’s sexual harassment of female subordinates. Among women, Fear of Negative Evaluation scores were unrelated to sexual harassment of male subordinates. Further, this relationship held controlling for Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Generalized Self-Efficacy scores, suggesting that the fear that others would see oneself as incompetent was a better predictor of sexual harassment than one’s self-perceived incompetence. Implications for the relationship between power, personality, and sexual harassment, and for interventions designed to curb sexual harassment, are discussed.

Keywords

Sexual harassment Power Incompetence Gender harassment Fear of negative evaluation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The material in this paper has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All who participated provided informed consent. The paper complies with APA ethical standards, and all authors have seen and approved of the paper in its current form. All research in this manuscript was completed at Ohio University although the first author has since changed her affiliation.

Supplementary material

11199_2018_938_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511–536.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→ sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berdahl, J. L. (2007a). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berdahl, J. L. (2007b). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425–437.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergman, M. E., Langhout, R. D., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (un) reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 230–242.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bushman, B. J., Bonacci, A. M., Van Dijk, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Narcissism, sexual refusal, and aggression: Testing a narcissistic reactance model of sexual coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1027–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 375–395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleveland, J. N., & Kerst, M. E. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An under- articulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1004/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Criss, D. (2017, Nov 1). The (incomplete) list of powerful men accused of sexual harassment after Harvey Weinstein. CNN. Retrieved from cnn.com.
  15. Fast, N. J., & Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1406–1413.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02452.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferguson, A. J., Ormiston, M. E., & Moon, H. (2010). From approach to inhibition: The influence of power on responses to poor performers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 305–320.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fineran, S., & Bennett, L. (1999). Gender and power issues of peer sexual harassment among teenagers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(6), 626–641.  https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014006004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.6.621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 117–138.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01312.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutek, B. A., & Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 28–48.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harvey Weinstein timeline: How the scandal unfolded (2018, Feb 12), BBC News. Retrieved from bbc.com/news.
  26. Hitlan, R. T., Pryor, J. B., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Olson, M. (2009). Antecedents of gender harassment: An analysis of person and situation factors. Sex Roles, 61(11–12), 794–807.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9689-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kantor, J., & Abrams, R. (2017, Oct 10). Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie and others say Weinstein harassed them. The New York Times. Retrieved from nytimes.com.
  28. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kunstman, J. W., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 282–294.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(3), 371–375.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283093007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2017). The economic and career effects of sexual harassment on working women. Gender and Society, 31(3), 333–358.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217704631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pettit, N. C., Yong, K., & Spataro, S. E. (2010). Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 396–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Popovich, P. M., & Warren, M. A. (2010). The role of power in sexual harassment as a counterproductive behavior in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17(5–6), 269–290.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00288453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pryor, J. B., & Stoller, L. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294202003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pryor, J. B., LaVite, C. M., & Stoller, L. M. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 68–83.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Quick, J. C., & McFadyen, M. (2017). Sexual harassment: Have we made any progress? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 286–298.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in healthy psychology: A user’s portfolio: Casual and controlled beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
  42. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, M. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2017). Sexual aggression when power is new: Effects of acute high power on chronically low-power individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 201–223.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeigler-Hill, V. (2006). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: Implications for narcissism and self-esteem instability. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 119–144.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00371.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA
  2. 2.Office of Student Life, Center for the Study of Student LifeThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations