Room for Improvement: Girls’ and Boys’ Home Environments are Still Gendered
- 686 Downloads
Decades ago, Rheingold and Cook (1975) observed marked gender-typing of preschool children’s playthings and room furnishings. Our purpose was to determine whether this form of implicit gender socialization has been altered by cultural shifts toward more egalitarian attitudes. We also examined potential predictors of children’s room contents, including parents’ self-perceived gender-stereotypical personality traits (i.e., expressivity and instrumentality), sibling composition, and preschool experience as a proxy for exposure to peer pressure to conform to gender norms. In-depth cataloging of 75 U.S. preschoolers’ room contents (n = 39 girls) found significant gender differences that were consistent with the gender-typing documented decades ago. Multilevel modeling showed parents’ expressivity and instrumentality largely to be unrelated to their child’s gender-typed playthings. Also, children in families with same-gender siblings, and girls who had spent more time in preschool, had more gender-typed playthings. Thus, the gender-typing of children’s playthings is attributable to multiple pathways, although familial contributors were minimal in our study. We discuss implications for toy advertising and how parents can be astute consumers, as well as strategies to create gender-neutral preschool classrooms and home environments.
KeywordsChildren’s toys Play preferences Gender stereotypes Gender socialization Parenting Preschoolers
The authors contributed equally to the present paper. Elaine Blakemore, Campbell Leaper, Carol Martin, and Maureen Perry-Jenkins provided helpful insights during the writing of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors are in agreement with the content of the manuscript, and we have no conflict of interest related to this study. Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript and so should be considered equal co-authors. Also, the manuscript has not been published previously in part or whole, nor is the manuscript under review in another outlet. As noted in the manuscript, this study was approved by Colorado State University’s Institutional Review Board, and all ethical obligations were met (including informed consent) in the conduct of this study.
- Aina, O. E., & Cameron, P. A. (2011). Why does gender matter? Counteracting stereotypes with young children. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 39, 11–20.Google Scholar
- Bigler, R., Hayes, A. R., & Hamilton, V. (2013). The role of schools in the early socialization of gender differences. In C. Martin (Topic Ed.) and R. E. Tremblay, M. Boivin, & R. Dev. Peters (Eds.), Encyclopedia on early childhood development (pp. 14–17). Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development and Strategic Knowledge.Google Scholar
- Bradley, R. H. (2002). Environment and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Biology and ecology of parenting (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 281–314). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of gender development and functioning. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 92–119). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Carter, C. (2013, September 5). Toys R Us to stop gender biased marketing. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/10288057/Toys-R-Us-to-stop-gender-biased-marketing.html.
- Dorius, S. F., & Alwin, D. F. (2010). The global development of egalitarian beliefs—A decomposition of trends in the nature and structure of gender ideology. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research. Retrieved from https://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr10-723.pdf.Google Scholar
- Golombok, S., Rust, J., Zervoulis, K., Golding, J., & Hines, M. (2012). Continuity in sex-typed behavior from preschool to adolescence: A longitudinal population study of boys and girls aged 3–13 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9784-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Growing up Gendered. (2018). Toys and advertising: Should we have gender-specific toys? Retrieved from https://growingupgendered.weebly.com/toys-and-advertising.html. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.
- Hains, R. (2015, August 13). Target will stop labeling toys for boys or for girls. Good. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/08/13/target-will-stop-selling-toys-for-boys-or-for-girls-good/?utm_term=.1fc08bc5658d.
- Halim, M. L., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Zosuls, K. M., Lurye, L. E., & Greulich, F. K. (2014). Pink frilly dresses and the avoidance of all things “girly:” Children’s appearance rigidity and cognitive theories of gender development. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Institution of Engineering and Technology. (2016, December 6). Parents, retailers and search engines urged to ‘re-think the pink’ next Christmas. Retrieved from https://www.theiet.org/policy/media/press-releases/20161206.cfm. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.
- Kollmayer, M., Schultes, M. T., Schober, B., Hodosi, T., & Spiel, C. (2018). Parents’ judgments about the desirability of toys for their children: Associations with gender-role attitudes, Gender-typing of toys, and demographics. Sex Roles. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0882-4.
- Leaper, C. (2002). Parenting girls and boys. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Leaper, C., & Farkas, T. (2015). The socialization of gender during childhood and adolescence. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 541–565). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Leaper, C., Leve, L., Strasser, T., & Schwartz, R. (1995). Mother-child communication sequences: Play activity, child gender, and marital status effects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 307–327.Google Scholar
- Lenney, E. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 573–660). San Diego, CA: Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50015-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Let Toys Be Toys (2018). Lesson plan for primary schools and early years, ages 4–6 years. Retrieved from http://lettoysbetoys.org.uk/lesson-plan-for-primary-schools-reception-year-1/.
- Marmion, S., & Lundberg-Love, P. (2004). Learning masculinity and femininity: Gender socialization from parents and peers across the life span. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 1–26). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Martin, C. L., Kornienko, O., Schaefer, D. R., Hanish, L. D., Fabes, R. A., & Goble, P. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children's peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Development, 84, 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McHale, S. M., Kim, J. Y., Dotterer, A. M., Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2009). The development of gendered interests and personality qualities from middle childhood through adolescence: A biosocial analysis. Child Development, 80, 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01273.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Miller, C. F., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., & Hanish, L. D. (2013). Bringing the cognitive and the social together: How gender detectives and gender enforcers shape children's gender development. In M. R. Banaji & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 306–313). New York, NY: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890712.003.0056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patterson, C. J., Sutfin, E. L., & Fulcher, M. (2004). Division of labor among lesbian and heterosexual parenting couples: Correlates of specialized versus shared patterns. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000035626.90331.47.
- Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Sons, daughters, and family processes: Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sayer, A. G., & Klute, M. M. (2005). Analyzing couples and families: Multilevel methods. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 289–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172.d63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00951.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sweet, E. (2014, December 9). Toys are more divided by gender now than they were 50 years ago. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://pinxit.com/page67/downloads-7/files/Toys_Gender_Atlantic.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2018
- Unger, R. K. (1981). Sex as a social reality: Field laboratory research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00603.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar