How Low Can You(r Power) Go? It Depends on Whether You are Male or Female
Three online experiments were conducted to determine whether gender differences in feelings of power are most evident in objectively lower or higher power situations (total n = 1360; Studies 1 and 2: 238 and 771 U.S. MTurk respondents respectively; Study 3: 351 Canadian university students). We focused on evaluating whether men’s and women’s responses were in line with a cushioning account, whereby the higher power generally accorded to men as a group essentially serves as a back-up power source for men in lower power positions. We also evaluated support for a ceiling account, whereby women’s feelings of power are limited in higher power positions. Results were consistent with the cushioning account: Men reported feeling more powerful than women did when imagining or recalling occupying a lower power position and in a control baseline, but no gender difference was evident under higher power conditions. Results further revealed that women’s feelings of power were more variable across lower versus higher power positions than were men’s and indicated that women’s feelings of power are quite responsive to situationally afforded high power when it is available. Overall our findings suggest that occupying a higher power role eradicates gender differences in feelings of power that are otherwise evident and thus has an equalizing effect.
KeywordsGender differences Feelings of power Buffering hypothesis Hierarchy Situational power
The present article was facilitated by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant (#435-2012-0348) and a University of Manitoba Psychology Undergraduate Research Experience Award to Aleah Fontaine.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This manuscript is original, not previously published, and not under concurrent consideration elsewhere.
Conflict of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
The research was conducted in accordance with APA ethical guidelines. All experiments reported in this paper were approved by our university’s research ethics committee; all participants indicated consent in the online survey before proceeding to answer any questions.
- Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Interpersonal relations (Vol. 3, pp. 421–460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). NFER-NELSON: Windsor, UK. Retrieved from https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/engscal.htm.Google Scholar