Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 80, Issue 3–4, pp 186–199 | Cite as

A Short-Term Longitudinal Exploration of the Impact of TV Exposure on Objectifying Attitudes Toward Women in Early Adolescent Boys

  • Ann RousseauEmail author
  • Rachel F. Rodgers
  • Steven Eggermont
Original Article
  • 555 Downloads

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the relationships over time between television viewing (music and tween TV) and boys’ endorsement of sexualized gender roles, that is, views of women as sex objects and men as sexually dominant, as well as a tendency to objectify women’s bodies. As an additional question, we were interested in how parental socialization to gender roles related to these pathways. A sample of 496 Belgian boys aged 11.18 years (SD = 1.06, range = 9–13), participated in a longitudinal study and completed measures three times at 6-month intervals. Findings revealed that music TV was associated with increases in views of men as sexually dominant. Tween TV was associated with increases in views of women as sex objects, which in turn was associated with increased objectification of women’s bodies among adolescents who experienced high levels of gender-typical socialization from their parents. These findings suggest that media exposure among early adolescent boys may contribute to the development of sexually objectifying attitudes toward women. In addition, they highlight the critical role of parents in modulating the effect of media exposure and suggest the usefulness of engaging parents in interventions aiming to decrease these deleterious effects.

Keywords

Television Parental gender-role socialization Gender stereotypes Sexual objectification Early adolescent boys 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present research was funded by a grant (G050513 N) from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) granted to the first author.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) granted to the last author.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Uniqueness of Publication

The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript was submitted to the International Communication Association conference. If the manuscript is accepted, the findings will be presented at the ICA conference, but the manuscript will not be published in the conference’s proceedings.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. This study involved human participants, and procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Active informed consent was obtained from all participants. Authorship and ordering: All authors agree to the authorship order and manuscript content.

Supplementary material

11199_2018_925_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Annenberg Media Exposure Research Group. (2008). Linking measures of media exposure to sexual cognitions and behaviors: A review. Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 23–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450802063180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndorfer, C. L., & Stormshak, E. A. (2008). Same-sex versus other-sex best friendship in early adolescence: Longitudinal predictors of antisocial behavior throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1059–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9311-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubrey, J. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubrey, J. S., & Frisby, C. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 475–501.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.513468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, B. J., & Drogos, K. L. (2014). Sex on the shore: Wishful identification and parasocial relationships as mediators in the relationship between Jersey Shore exposure and emerging adults' sexual attitudes and behaviors. Media Psychology, 17, 102–126.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.872039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bos, H. M., Picavet, C., & Sandfort, T. G. (2012). Ethnicity, gender socialization, and children’s attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1082–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111420146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents' health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 95–113.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, J. D., Halpern, C. T., & L’Engle, K. L. (2005). Mass media as a sexual super peer for early maturing girls. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 420–427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2010). Gender and body image. In J. C. Chrisler & D. M. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 153–184). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Driesmans, K., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Playing a videogame with a sexualized female character increases adolescents' rape myth acceptance and tolerance toward sexual harassment. Games for Health Journal, 4, 91–94.  https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C. M., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents' role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Epstein, M., & Ward, L. M. (2011). Exploring parent-adolescent communication about gender: Results from adolescent and emerging adult samples. Sex Roles, 65, 108–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9975-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Farquhar, J. C., & Wasylkiw, L. (2007). Media images of men: Trends and consequences of body conceptualization. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 145–160.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.3.145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flynn, M. A., Park, S. Y., Morin, D. T., & Stana, A. (2015). Anything but real: Body idealization and objectification of MTV docusoap characters. Sex Roles, 72, 173–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0464-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia, R. L., Earnshaw, V. A., & Quinn, D. M. (2016). Objectification in action: Self-and other-objectification in mixed-sex interpersonal interactions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 213–228.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315614966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01987.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerding, A., & Signorielli, N. (2014). Gender roles in tween television programming: A content analysis of two genres. Sex Roles, 70, 43–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0330-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gondoli, D. M., Corning, A. F., Blodgett Salafia, E. H., Bucchianeri, M. M., & Fitzsimmons, E. E. (2011). Heterosocial involvement, peer pressure for thinness, and body dissatisfaction among young adolescent girls. Body Image, 8, 143–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.12.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Graff, K. A., Murnen, S. K., & Krause, A. K. (2013). Low-cut shirts and high-heeled shoes: Increased sexualization across time in magazine depictions of girls. Sex Roles, 69, 571–582.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0321-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gurung, R. A., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hargreaves, D. A., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). Female “thin ideal” media images and boys' attitudes toward girls. Sex Roles, 49, 539–544.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025841008820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254742561_Structural_Equation_Modeling_Guidelines_for_Determining_Model_Fit.Google Scholar
  29. Jordan, A. B. (2004). The role of media in children’s development: An ecological perspective. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kågesten, A., Gibbs, S., Blum, R. W., Moreau, C., Chandra-Mouli, V., Herbert, A., & Amin, A. (2016). Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS One, 11, e0157805.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157805.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, J. L., Lynn Sorsoli, C., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirsch, A. C., & Murnen, S. K. (2015). “Hot” girls and “cool dudes”: Examining the prevalence of the heterosexual script in American children’s television media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4, 18–30.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krayer, A., Ingledew, D. K., & Iphofen, R. (2008). Social comparison and body image in adolescence: A grounded theory approach. Health Education Research, 23, 892–903.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym076.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mares, M. L., Braun, M. T., & Hernandez, P. (2012). Pessimism and anxiety: Effects of tween sitcoms on expectations and feelings about peer relationships in school. Media Psychology, 15, 121–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.664762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, K. A., & Kazyak, E. (2009). Hetero-romantic love and heterosexiness in children's G-rated films. Gender & Society, 23, 315–336.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209335635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933.  https://doi.org/10.1037/00332909.128.6.903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McDade-Montez, E., Wallander, J., & Cameron, L. (2017). Sexualization in US Latina and White girls’ preferred children’s television programs. Sex Roles, 77, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0692-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonald, D. G. (2009). Media use and the social environment. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media processes and effects (pp. 251–268). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murnen, S. K., & Byrne, D. (1991). Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. The Journal of Sex Research, 28, 479–489.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499109551620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nabi, R. L., Biely, E. N., Morgan, S. J., & Stitt, C. R. (2003). Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology, 5, 303–330.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0504_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nikken, P., & de Graaf, H. (2013). Reciprocal relationships between friends’ and parental mediation of adolescents’ media use and their sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1696–1707.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9873-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parkes, A., Wight, D., Hunt, K., Henderson, M., & Sargent, J. (2013). Are sexual media exposure, parental restrictions on media use and co-viewing TV and DVDs with parents and friends associated with teenagers' early sexual behaviour? Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1121–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56, 381–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2009). A longitudinal investigation of peer sexual harassment victimization in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1173–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.01.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 117–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9720-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M. B. (2017). Media use and well-being. Status quo and open questions. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being. International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Renold, E. (2004). ‘Other’ boys: Negotiating non-hegemonic masculinities in the primary school. Gender and Education, 16, 247–265.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250310001690609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rideout, V. (2007). Parents, children & media: A Kaiser Family Foundation survey. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542901.
  51. Rideout, V. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-mediause-by-tweens-and-teens.
  52. Rodgers, R., & Chabrol, H. (2009). Parental attitudes, body image disturbance and disordered eating amongst adolescents and young adults: A review. European Eating Disorders Review, 17, 137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rousseau, A., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Television and preadolescents’ objectified dating script: Consequences for self-and interpersonal objectification. Mass Communication and Society, 22, 71–93.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1341533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rousseau, A., Eggermont, S., Bels, A., & Van den Bulck, H. (2018). Separating the sex from the object: Conceptualizing sexualization and (sexual) objectification in Flemish preteens’ popular television programs. Journal of Children and Media, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1425888.
  55. Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54, 123–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simpson, C. C., Kwitowski, M., Boutte, R., Gow, R. W., & Mazzeo, S. E. (2016). Messages about appearance, food, weight and exercise in “tween” television. Eating Behaviors, 23, 70–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Snell Jr., W. E. (1998). The stereotypes about male sexuality scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Baurerman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures: A compendium (2nd ed., pp. 463–465). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Swami, V., & Voracek, M. (2013). Associations among men's sexist attitudes, objectification of women, and their own drive for muscularity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 168–174.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tatangelo, G. L., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2017). Children’s body image and social comparisons with peers and the media. Journal of Health Psychology, 22, 776–787.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315615409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. ter Bogt, T. F., Engels, R. C., Bogers, S., & Kloosterman, M. (2010). “Shake it baby, shake it”: Media preferences, sexual attitudes and gender stereotypes among adolescents. Sex Roles, 63, 844–859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9815-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2015). The role of self-objectification in the mental health of early adolescent girls: Predictors and consequences. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsv021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toomey, R. B., Card, N. A., & Casper, D. M. (2014). Peers’ perceptions of gender nonconformity: Associations with overt and relational peer victimization and aggression in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 463–485.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613495446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Valkenburg, P. M., & Cantor, J. (2000). Children’s likes and dislikes of entertainment programs. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 135–152). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vandenbosch, L., Vervloessem, D., & Eggermont, S. (2013). “I might get your heart racing in my skin-tight jeans”: Sexualization on music entertainment television. Communication Studies, 64, 178–194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wallis, C. (2011). Performing gender: A content analysis of gender display in music videos. Sex Roles, 64, 160–172.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9814-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ward, L. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 595–615.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlation and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ward, L. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 560–577.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ward, L. M., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The impact of men's magazines on adolescent boys' objectification and courtship beliefs. Journal of Adolescence, 39, 49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Helms, S. W., Golin, C. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Sexual communication between early adolescents and their dating partners, parents, and best friends. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 731–741.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.843148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Zosuls, K. M., Miller, C. F., Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2011). Gender development research in sex roles: Historical trends and future directions. Sex Roles, 64, 826–842.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9902-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Zurbriggen, E., Ramsey, L., & Jaworski, B. (2011). Self- and partner objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leuven School for Mass Communication Research, Faculty of Social SciencesKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Counseling and Applied Educational PsychologyNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations