Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 79, Issue 3–4, pp 206–217 | Cite as

The Motivated Cognitive Basis of Transphobia: The Roles of Right-Wing Ideologies and Gender Role Beliefs

  • Arti P. Makwana
  • Kristof Dhont
  • Jonas De keersmaecker
  • Parisa Akhlaghi-Ghaffarokh
  • Marine Masure
  • Arne Roets
Original Article

Abstract

Transgender individuals challenge the traditional assumption that an individual’s gender identity is permanently determined by their assigned sex at birth. Perceiving ambiguity surrounding indeterminate gender identities associated with transgender individuals may be especially disturbing for those who generally dislike ambiguity and have preference for order and predictability, that is, for people scoring higher on Need for Closure (NFC). We tested the associations between NFC and transphobia in two studies using community samples from the United Kingdom (n = 231) and Belgium (n = 175), and we examined whether right-wing ideological attitudes and traditional gender role beliefs mediated these relationships. Confirming our expectations, we found that NFC was significantly associated with transphobia through both stronger adherence to social conventions and obedience to authorities (i.e., right-wing authoritarianism) and stronger endorsements of traditional gender roles in the UK and Belgium, as well as through stronger preferences for hierarchy and social inequality (i.e., social dominance orientation) in the UK. Our results suggest that transgender individuals are more likely to be targets of prejudice by those higher in NFC at least partly due to the strong preference for preserving societal traditions and the resistance to a perceived disruption of traditional gender norms. Hence, attempts to reduce transphobia might be especially challenging among those high in NFC. Nevertheless, prejudice-reducing interventions could incorporate techniques that satisfy epistemic needs for predictability, certainty, and simple structure which may have higher chances of success among high NFC individuals.

Keywords

Transgender (attitudes toward) Transphobia Need for closure Ideology Right-wing attitudes Gender roles 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors disclose that there are no potential conflicts of interest (either financial or non-financial).

Human Participants

The research was conducted using human participants (who completed a survey).

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Kent. The research also complied with ethics committee guidelines of Ghent University.

Informed Consent

All participants gave their informed consent to take part in the research.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_860_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Adams, K. A., Nagoshi, C. T., Filip-Crawford, G., Terrell, H. K., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2016). Components of gender-nonconformity prejudice. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17, 185–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1200509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.Google Scholar
  4. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2010). The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 715–725.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210366306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, M. J., & Gladstone, N. (2012). Development of a short version of the gender role beliefs scale. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 154–158.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120205.05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cichocka, A., & Dhont, K. (in press). The personality bases of political ideology and behavior. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. London: SAGE (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Cichocka, A., Dhont, K., & Makwana, A. P. (2017). On self-love and outgroup hate: Opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 31, 366–384.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cragun, R. T., & Sumerau, J. E. (2015). The last bastion of sexual and gender prejudice? Sexualities, race, gender, religiosity, and spirituality in the examination of prejudice toward sexual and gender minorities. The Journal of Sex Research, 52, 821–834.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.925534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Does lower cognitive ability predict greater prejudice? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 454–459.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414549750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhont, K., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 514–528.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhont, K., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of need for closure underlies the transmission of authoritarianism and anti-immigrant prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 779–784.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human-animal relations model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507–522.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donaldson, C. D., Handren, L. M., & Lac, A. (2017). Applying multilevel modeling to understand individual and cross-cultural variations in attitudes toward homosexual people across 28 European countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 93–112.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116672488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841–862.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Federico, C. M., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 524–541.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garelick, A. S., Filip-Crawford, G., Varley, A. H., Nagoshi, C. T., Nagoshi, J. L., & Evans, R. (2017). Beyond the binary: Exploring the role of ambiguity in biphobia and transphobia. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 172–189.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2017.1319890.Google Scholar
  23. Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J., Herman, J. L., Harrison, J., & Keisling, M. (2010). National transgender discrimination survey report on health and health care. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. (2005). The development and validation of the Genderism and Transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53, 531–544.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., ... Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033.supp.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodson, G., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, J. (2007). The invention of heterosexuality. New York: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kerr, P. S., & Holden, R. R. (1996). Development of the gender role beliefs scale (GRBS). Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 3–16.Google Scholar
  31. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263–283.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.
  32. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861–876.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kteily, N., Hodson, G., Dhont, K., & Ho, A. (2017). Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217716750.
  34. Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.596954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013, September). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org.
  36. Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463–493.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lombardi, E. (2009). Varieties of transgender/transsexual lives and their relationship with transphobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 977–992.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903275393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation. Psychology & Sexuality, 6, 275–294.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.987684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meeusen, C., & Dhont, K. (2015). Parent–child similarity in common and specific components of prejudice: The role of ideological attitudes and political discussion. European Journal of Personality, 29, 585–598.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meloen, J. D. (1991). Inventarisatie Nederlandse F-schalen 1959–1990. In P. Scheepers & R. Eisinga (Eds.), Intolerant en Onderdanig [Intolerant and Submissive] (pp. 186–222). Nijmegen: ITS.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, L. R., & Grollman, E. A. (2015). The social costs of gender nonconformity for transgender adults: Implications for discrimination and health. Sociological Forum, 30, 809–831.  https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen.Google Scholar
  44. Nagoshi, J. L., Adams, K. A., Terrell, H. K., Hill, E. D., Brzuzy, S., & Nagoshi, C. T. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nagoshi, J. L., Brzuzy, S. I., & Terrell, H. K. (2012). Deconstructing the complex perceptions of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among transgender individuals. Feminism & Psychology, 22, 405–422.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353512461929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A., & Cornelis, I. (2011). The closed mind: ‘Experience’ and ‘cognition’ aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right-wing attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 25, 184–197.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roccato, M., & Ricolfi, L. (2005). On the correlation between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 187–200.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies. Psychologica Belgica, 46, 235–252.  https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-46-3-235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the need for closure scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 266–280.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011a). Allport’s prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 349–354.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011b). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men's and women's sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26, 350–359.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., & Hong, Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stern, C., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Physical androgyny and categorization difficulty shape political conservatives’ attitudes toward transgender people. Social Psychological and Personality Science.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617703172.
  62. Stern, C., West, T. V., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Conservatives negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people to maintain a sense of certainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15337–15342.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517662112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stotzer, R. L. (2008). Gender identity and hate crimes: Violence against transgender people in Los Angeles County. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5, 43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2008.5.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tebbe, E. N., & Moradi, B. (2012). Anti-transgender prejudice: A structural equation model of associated constructs. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 251–261.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Tebbe, E. A., Moradi, B., & Ege, E. (2014). Revised and abbreviated forms of the Genderism and Transphobia scale: Tools for assessing anti-trans* prejudice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 581–592.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Valentine, D. (2007). Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2323–2344.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02105.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Hiel, A., Duriez, B., & Kossowska, M. (2006). The presence of left-wing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship with conservative ideology. Political Psychology, 27, 769–793.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00532.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walch, S. E., Sinkkanen, K. A., Swain, E. M., Francisco, J., Breaux, C. A., & Sjoberg, M. D. (2012). Using intergroup contact theory to reduce stigma against transgender individuals: Impact of a transgender speaker panel presentation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2583–2605.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Warriner, K., Nagoshi, C. T., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2013). Correlates of homophobia, transphobia, and internalized homophobia in gay or lesbian and heterosexual samples. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 1317–1334.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.806177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Whitley, B. E., & Aegisdottir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42, 947–967.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007026016001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Whitley, B. E., & Lee, S. E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144–170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02309.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Willoughby, B. L. B., Hill, D. B., Gonzalez, C. A., Lacorazza, A., Macapagal, R. A., Barton, M. E., & Doty, N. D. (2010). Who hates gender outlaws? A multisite and multinational evaluation of the Genderism and Transphobia scale. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12, 254–271.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2010.550821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Winter, S., Chalungsooth, P., Teh, Y. K., Rojanalert, N., Maneerat, K., Wong, Y. W., ... Macapagal, R. A. (2009). Transpeople, transprejudice and pathologization: A seven-country factor analytic study. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21, 96–118.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19317610902922537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Worthen, M. G. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68, 703–723.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0155-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arti P. Makwana
    • 1
  • Kristof Dhont
    • 1
  • Jonas De keersmaecker
    • 2
  • Parisa Akhlaghi-Ghaffarokh
    • 1
  • Marine Masure
    • 2
  • Arne Roets
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Group Processes, School of PsychologyUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Department of Developmental, Personality and Social PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations