Parents’ Influence on Infants’ Gender-Typed Toy Preferences
- 2.8k Downloads
Gender socialization influences children at early ages, shaping their developing identities. The toys provided by parents deliver some of the earliest gender-based messages by encouraging children to engage in activities associated with, for example, dolls and trucks. In the current study, we measured the influence of parental socialization by assessing 5- and 12 ½-month-old infants’ exposure to dolls and trucks and by experimentally manipulating parents’ encouragement to play with these toys. We found that infants displayed gender-typical toy preferences at 12 ½, but not 5 months, a pattern characteristic of previous studies. However, brief encouragement by a parent to play with toys from each category was ineffective in altering infants’ preferences. Rather, the types of toys present in the home predicted preferences, suggesting that at-home exposure to toys may be influential in the development of toy preferences. These findings reveal that socialization processes may indeed play a role in the formation of early gender-typical toy preferences and highlight the importance of equal toy exposure during infancy to ensure optimal development.
KeywordsGender differences Gender Infant Parents Toys Gender socialization
The present research was supported in part by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20 GM103505.
We would like to thank Caitlin Van Voorhis, Ellen Honsa, Savanna Westrom and the research assistants of the Infant Cognitive Development Lab at North Dakota State University for their help with data collection and manuscript preparation, as well as the parents who agreed to have their infants participate in this research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards set forth by the American Psychological Association and by the home institution’s Institutional Review Board. Informed consent and parental permission was obtained for all participants. This manuscript was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests relating to this research.
- Beall, A. E. (1993). A social constructionist view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 127–147). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Berenbaum, S. A., & Hines, M. (1992). Early androgens are related to childhood sex-typed toy preferences. Psychological Science, 3(3), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00028.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhana, D., & Mayeza, E. (2016). We don’t play with gays, they’re not real boys…they can’t fight: Hegemonic masculinity (homophobic) violence in the primary years of schooling. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S., & Liben, L. (2009). Gender development. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cohen-Bendahan, C. C., van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavior Review, 29, 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004.
- Crawley, S., & Broad, K. L. (2008). The construction of sex and sexualities. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 545–566). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., van Berkel, S. R., Hallers-Haalboom, E. T., Mesman, J., & Bakersman-Kraneburg, M. J. (2013). Gender stereotypes in the family context: Mothers, fathers, and siblings. Sex Roles, 68, 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0265-4.
- Escudero, P., Robbins, R. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2013). Sex-related preferences for real and doll faces versus real and toy objects in young infants and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gredebäck, G., Johnson, S., & von Hofsten, C. (2009). Eye tracking in infancy research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640903325758.
- Haight, W. L., Parke, R. D., & Black, J. E. (1997). Mother’s and fathers’ beliefs about and spontaneous participation in their toddlers’ pretend play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 271–290. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23092492.
- Halim, M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Zosuls, K. M., Lurve, L. E., & Greulich, F. K. (2014). Pink frilly dresses and the avoidance of all things “girly”: Children’s appearance rigidity and cognitive theories of gender development. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hines, M., Pasterski, V., Spencer, D., Neufeld, S., Patalay, P., Hindmarsh, P. C., ... Acerini, C. L. (2016). Prenatal androgen exposure alters girls' responses to information indicating gender-appropriate behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1688), 20150125. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0125.
- Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Advances in Infancy Research, 5, 69–95.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. A. (1966). A cognitive–developmental analysis of children’s sex role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lamminmåki, A., Hines, M., Kuiri-Hänninen, T., Kilpeläinen, L., Dunkel, L., & Sankilampi, U. (2012). Testosterone measured in infancy predicts subsequent sex-typed behavior in boys and in girls. Hormones and Behavior, 61(4), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leaper, C. (2000). The social construction and socialization of gender during development. In P. H. Miller & E. K. Scholnick (Eds.), Toward a feminist development psychology (pp. 127–152). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lindsey, E. W., & Mize, J. (2000). Parent-child physical and pretense play: Links to children’s social competence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 565–591.Google Scholar
- Lober, J. (1991). Dismantling Noah’s ark. In J. Lober & S. A. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender (pp. 355–369). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Lober, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University of Press.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, A. R., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2009). The social context of gendered power. In C. Knudson-Martin & A. R. Mahoney (Eds.), Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 17–29). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., Baratz Dalke, K., Berenbaum, S. A., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Hines, M., & Schober, J. M. (2016). Gender assignment, reassignment and outcome in disorders of sex development: Update of the 2005 Consensus Conference. Hormone Research in Pædiatrics, 85(2), 112–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okruhlik, K. (1998). Gender and the biological sciences. In M. Curd & J. A. Cover (Eds.), Philosophy of science: The central issues (pp. 192–208). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Pennell, G. E. (1994). Babes in Toyland: Learning an ideology of gender. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 359–364.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Provenzano, F. J., & Luria, Z. (1974). The eye of the beholder: Parent’s views on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44, 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1974.tb00905.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Servin, A., Nordenström, A., Larsson, A., & Bohlin, G. (2003). Prenatal androgens and gender-typed behavior: A study of girls with mild and severe forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.1240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teichner, G., Ames, E. W., & Kerig, P. K. (1997). The relation of infant crying and the sex of the infant to parents’ perceptions of the infant and themselves. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 34, 59–60.Google Scholar
- Todd, B. K., Barry, J. A., & Thommessen, S. A. (2016). Preferences for ‘gender-typed’ toys in boys and girls aged 9 to 32 months. Infant and Child Development. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.
- van de Beek, C., van Goozen, S. M., Buitelaar, J. K., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2009). Prenatal sex hormones (maternal and amniotic fluid) and gender-related play behavior in 13-month-old infants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9291-z.
- von Hofsten, C., & Fazel-Zandy, S. (1984). Development of visually guided hand orientation in reaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 208–219.Google Scholar
- Weinraub, M., Clemens, L. P., Sockloff, A., Ethridge, T., Gracely, E., & Myers, B. (1984). The development of sex role stereotypes in the third year: Relationships to gender labeling, gender identity, sex-types toy preference, and family characteristics. Child Development, 55(4), 1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weisgram, E. S., Fulcher, M., & Dinella, L. M. (2014). Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors on preschool children’s toy preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yelland, N., & Grieshaber, S. (1998). Blurring the edges. In N. Yelland (Ed.), Gender in early childhood (pp. 1–11). Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45, 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar