Objectification and System Justification Impact Rape Avoidance Behaviors
- 1.2k Downloads
There is little recent research on women’s adoption of rape avoidance behaviors, and there has been no known investigation into how adoption of these behaviors relates to various system justification beliefs or experiences of sexual objectification. We surveyed 294 U.S. women aged 18 to 40 to assess experiences of objectification, belief in a just world, gender-specific system justification, benevolent sexism, rape myth acceptance, and engagement in rape avoidance behaviors. Belief in a just world, gender-specific system justification, and benevolent sexism were conceptualized and analyzed as a “system justification” latent factor due to similarities between constructs regarding how they influence worldview, particularly regarding fairness and relations between dominant and subordinate groups. Our hypothesized model had good fit to the data and illustrated that experiencing objectification was related to increased rape myth acceptance and system justification, which, in turn, were related to implementation of rape avoidance behaviors. Further, system justification was significantly positively related to rape myth acceptance. Results show the continued importance of understanding the role of objectification in the endorsement of rape myths and assessments of societal fairness, as well as how women’s attitudes about society may ultimately affect their assessment of rape myths and their personal behavior. This research provides new information and groundwork for researchers developing rape education programming in addition to those interested in the complex relationship between women’s experiences and behavioral outcomes.
KeywordsSexual objectification System justification Belief in a just world Benevolent sexism Rape myth acceptance
This research was supported in part by a Psi Chi/Council of Undergraduate Research Summer Research Grant awarded to the authors.
- Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of strangers and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125. doi: 10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.
- Beneke, T. (1982). Men on rape: What they have to say about sexual violence. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Bantam/Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Capodilupo, C. M., Nadal, K. L., Corman, L., Hamit, S., Lyons, O. B., & Weinberg, A. (2010). The manifestation of gender microaggressions. In D. W. Sue (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact (pp. 193-216). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- DuBow, F., McCabe, E., & Kaplan, G. (1979). Reactions to crime: A critical review of the literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/61954NCJRS.pdf.Google Scholar
- Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2013). Reporting rape in 2013: Summary reporting system (SRS) user manual and technical specification. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/recent-program-updates/reporting-rape-in-2013.
- Griffin, S. (1979). Rape, the power of consciousness. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Hafer, C. L., & Choma, B. L. (2009). Belief in a just world, perceived fairness, and justification of the status quo. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 107–125). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herman, D. (1989). The rape culture. In J. Freedman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (pp. 20–44). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1998.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., Van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy. Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 173–203). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
- Miller, P., & Biele, N. (1993). Twenty years later: The unfinished revolution. In E. F. Buchwald (Ed.), Transforming a rape culture (pp. 47–54). Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nadal, K. L. (2010). Gender microaggressions: Implications for mental health. In M. Paludi (Ed.), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide (Vol. 2, pp. 155–175). Praeger: Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
- Pollitt, K. (1985, December 12). Hers: In many public spaces, women are on sufferance. The New York Times, pp. C2.Google Scholar
- Scott, H. (2003). Stranger danger: Explaining women’s fear of crime. Western Criminology Review, 4, 203–214.Google Scholar
- Valentine, G. (1989). The geography of women’s fear. Area, 21, 385–390.Google Scholar
- Valentine, G. (1992). Images of danger: Women’s sources of information about the spatial distribution of male violence. Area, 24, 22–29.Google Scholar
- Websdale, N. S. (1999). Predators: The social construction of “stranger-danger” in Washington state as a form of patriarchal ideology. In J. Ferrell & N. S. Websdale (Eds.), Making trouble: Cultural constructions of crime, deviance, and control (pp. 91–114). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar