Parental Perceptions of the Sexuality of Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities
- 100 Downloads
The sexuality of people with disabilities is often conceptualized as asexual. Furthermore, public discourse regards people with disabilities as highly prone to sexual abuse. The few studies that contemplate on parents’ of people with intellectual disability (ID) point of view uncover the parents’ perceptions towards their offspring’s sexuality. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the sexuality of adolescents with ID from their parents perceptions. The study was conducted using a phenomenological approach and included 21 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with parents of adolescents with ID. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Parents’ perceptions of their children’s sexuality and their involvement concerning sexuality reveal dilemmas and tensions that remain unresolved. Although some parents did tend to treat their children’s sexuality as non-normative and as a source of problems and thus ignored, prevented, and limited their children’s sexual expressions, other parents presented different perspectives, acknowledging the sexuality of adolescents with ID and their right to express it. The findings also reveal a new and exciting insight related to the conceptual space of physical contact between parents and children, which moves between physical expressions of love and care and feelings of prohibited sexuality. Professionals working with people with ID and their families should be allowed to create a professional dialogue that would enable the discussion and clarification of the dilemmas and challenges related to the subject.
KeywordsParents Sexuality Adolescents Intellectual disabilities Israel
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Author Iris Manor-Binyamini and Michal Schreiber-Divon declares that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Haifa University’s Ethics Committee (reference number 284/17).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Berg, B.: Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education. Bourdieu, P, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
- 4.Creswell, J.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publishing House, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
- 8.Fucault, M.: Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books, New York (1979)Google Scholar
- 10.Jones, L., Beilis, M.A., Wood, S., Highes, K., McCoy, E., Eckley, L., Officer, A.: Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet 380, 899–907 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/SO140-6736(12)60692-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Karellou, J.: Parents’ attitudes towards the sexuality of people with learning disabilities in Greece. J. Dev. Disabil. 13(3), 55–72 (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Löfgren-Mårtenson, L.: ”May I?” About sexuality and love in the new generation with intellectual disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 22(3), 197–207 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sedi.0000039062.73691.cb CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.McDaniels, B., Fleming, A.: Sexual health education: a missing piece in transition services for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities? J. Rehabil. 84(3), 28–38 (2018)Google Scholar
- 15.Pownall, J.D., Jahoda, A., Hastings, R., Kerr, L.: Sexual understanding and development of young people with intellectual disabilities: mothers’ perspectives of within-family context. Am. J. Intell. Dev. Disabil. 116(3), 205–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-116.3.205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Swain, J., Thirlaway, C.: ‘Just when you think you got it all sorted …’: parental dilemmas in relation to the developing sexuality of young profoundly disabled people. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 24, 58–64 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1996.tb00203.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar