Professionals, Parents and the General Public: Attitudes Towards the Sexuality of Persons with Intellectual Disability
- 39 Downloads
Prejudices still surround the issue of sexuality of persons with intellectual disability (ID), both in families and in the professional community. To assess attitudes of parents, professionals and the general population towards the sexuality of persons with ID, so that appropriate sexual education could be introduced and implemented with persons with ID. We used Attitudes to Sexuality Questionnaire—Individuals with an Intellectual Disability, with a questionnaire on general demographic data. Attitudes of professionals on the sexuality of persons with ID mainly show conservative viewpoints; parents feel unprepared to educate their children on the subject of sexuality. Attitudes on sexuality of persons with ID are important to consider since they can provide valuable clues as to the direction in which educational programs should be moving in order to have an effect on achieving a better quality of life for persons with ID.
KeywordsSexuality Intellectual disability Attitudes Education Serbia
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All participants gave written consent noting that consent. Filling out the questionnaire and the results will have no impact on their further treatment as well as the treatment of their children when it came to the parents. Filling in the questionnaire was anonymous.
- 2.Haynes, A.: An investigation into parental attitudes about sexuality and children with intellectual disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, City University of Seattle (2016)Google Scholar
- 4.Ballan, M.: Parents as sexuality educators for their children with developmental disabilities. SIECUS Rep. 29(3), 14 (2001)Google Scholar
- 17.Bratković, D.: Edukacija o spolnosti osoba s mentalnom retardacijom, Priručnik, Zagreb, Hrvatski savez udruga za osobe s mentalnom retardacijom (2000)Google Scholar
- 22.Schaafsma, D., Kok, G., Stoffelen, J.M., Van Doorn, P., Curfs, L.M.: Identifying the important factors associated with teaching sex education to people with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional survey among paid care staff. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 39(2), 157–166 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Goodman, L., Budner, S., Lesh, B.: The parents’ role in sex education for the retarded. Ment. Retard. 9(1), 43–45 (1971)Google Scholar
- 32.Brantlinger, E.: Measuring variation and change in attitudes of residential care staff toward the sexuality of mentally retarded persons. Ment. Retard. 21(1), 17 (1983)Google Scholar
- 35.Murray, J.L., Minnes, P.M.: Staff attitudes towards the sexuality of persons with intellectual disability. Aust. N. Z. J. Dev. Disabil. 19(1), 45–52 (1994)Google Scholar
- 36.Owen, F.A., Griffiths, D.M., Feldman, M.A., Sales, C., Richards, D.A.: Perceptions of acceptable boundaries by persons with developmental disabilities and their care providers. J. Devel. Disabil. 7(1), 34–49 (2000)Google Scholar
- 38.Wilson, C.D., Taylor, J.A., Kowalski, S.M., Carlson, J.: The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47(3), 276–301 (2010)Google Scholar
- 39.Mitchell, L., Doctor, R.M., Butler, D.C.: Attitudes of caretakers toward the sexual behavior of mentally retarded persons. Am. J. Ment. Defic. 83(3), 289–296 (1978)Google Scholar
- 41.Oliver, M.N., Anthony, A., Leimkuhl, T.T., Skillman, G.D.: Attitudes toward acceptable socio-sexual behaviors for persons with mental retardation: implications for normalization and community integration. Educ. Train. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. 37, 193–201 (2002)Google Scholar