Advertisement

Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 3–14 | Cite as

Sexual and Body Esteem in People with Spinal Cord Damage

  • Peter W. NewEmail author
Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Sexual esteem is the positive regard for and confidence in an individual’s capacity to experience their sexuality in a satisfying and enjoyable way. Body esteem is the overall positive or negative evaluation of one’s body. Physical disability can have an adverse impact on both of these constructs. This project aimed to study the sexual esteem and body esteem in people with spinal cord damage (SCD). A comprehensive survey (August 2013–June 2014) was conducted of people with SCD (n = 154) living in the community, Australia. The survey included the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem (PDSBE) scale. There were 146 participants who completed the PDSBE scale. Most were male (n = 100, 68.5%), average age of 47.9 years (SD = 13.5) and a median of 11 years (IQR 4–20) post SCD. The mean PDSBE score was 22.2 (SD = 7.9). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.35) between the total PDSBE score and quality of life as a whole (P = .001) and a weak correlation (r = 0.22) with function (P = 0.01). There was no significant influence of gender or sexual orientation on PDSBE scores. However, people with non-traumatic SCD and paraplegia tended to have higher scores (non-traumatic SCD mean 25.8 [SD = 6.7] vs traumatic SCD mean 21.0 [SD = 8.0], P = .002; paraplegia mean 23.4 [8.1] vs tetraplegia mean 20.6 [7.5], P = 0.04). The mean PDSBE scores for the people with SCD in this study were lower than that reported for non-SCD disabled (mean 25.9, SD = 9.2). Sexual and body esteem are psychological-sexual constructs that complement existing outcomes used when evaluating the impact of SCD.

Keywords

Australia Rehabilitation Sexuality Spinal cord diseases Self-report Self concept Sexual behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. Kim Proudlove (nee Currie, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia), Vanessa Hamilton (previously Sexual Health Nurse Consultant, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia) and the following people with SCD provided comments and suggestions regarding the survey questions: Lynne Panayiotis, Georgina Fiorentino, Mark Hanson, Mike Short, and two others who wished to remain anonymous. Merilyn Seddon (Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) and the following organizations are thanked for their assistance with distribution of the survey to potential participants: AQA (Victoria), Spinal Injuries Association (Queensland), Spinal Cord Injuries Australia (New South Wales), Paraplegic-Quadriplegic Association of WA, ParaQuad NSW, Paraplegic and Quadriplegic Association of South Australia, Spinal Cord Injury Network (Australia). The author would especially like to thank all the participants who completed the survey.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethics standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was implied by the participants completing the study questionnaire after they read the participant information and consent document.

References

  1. 1.
    Snell, W.E.J., Fisher, T.D., Walters, A.S.: The multidimensional sexuality questionnaire. An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Ann Sex Res 6, 27–55 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayer, J.D., Eisenberg, M.G.: Mental represnetation of the body: stability and change in response to illness and disability. Rehabil Psychol 33, 155–171 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassouneh, D., Hanson, G., Perrin, N., McNeff, E.: Abuse and health on individuals with spinal cord injury and dysfunction. J Rehabil 74, 3–9 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taleporos, G., McCabe, M.P.: Development and validation of the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem scale. Sex Disabil 20(3), 159–176 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elliott, S.: Sexual dysfunction in women with spinal cord injury. In: Lin, V.W. (ed.) Spinal cord medicine: principles and practice, 2nd edn, pp. 429–437. Demos Medical Publishing, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott, S.: Sexual dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury. In: Lin, V.W. (ed.) Spinal cord medicine: principles and practice, 2nd edn, pp. 409–428. Demos Medical Publishing, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biering-Sorensen, F., Alexander, M.S., Elliott, S., Popolo, G.D., Previnaire, J.G., Velez, A.R.: Sexuality and fertility management. In: Chhabra, H.S. (ed.) ISCoS textbook on comprehensive management of spinal cord injuries, pp. 613–635. Wolters Kluwer, New Delhi (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dillman, D., Smyth, J., Christian, L.: Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    New, P.W., Currie, K.E.: Development of a comprehensive survey of sexuality issues including a self-report version of the International Spinal Cord Injury sexual function basic datasets. Spinal Cord 54, 584–591 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    New, P.W., Seddon, M., Redpath, C., Currie, K.E., Warren, N.: Recommendations for spinal rehabilitation professionals regarding sexual education needs and preferences of people with spinal cord dysfunction: a mixed methods study. Spinal Cord 54, 1203–1209 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    New, P.W.: Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med 39, 665–670 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abramson, C., McBride, K., Konnyu, K., Elliott, S.: Sexual health outcome measures for individuals with a spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 46, 320–324 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCabe, M.P., Taleporos, G.: Sexual esteem, sexual satisfaction, and sexual behavior among people with physical disability. Arch Sex Behav 32, 359–369 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charlifue, S., Post, M.W., Biering-Sørensen, F., Catz, A., Dijkers, M., Geyh, S., et al.: International spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord 50(9), 672–675 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Post, M.W.M., Adriaansen, J.J.E., Charlifue, S., Biering-Sørensen, F., van Asbeck, F.W.A.: Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord 54, 314–318 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kreuter, M., Sullivan, M., Siösteen, A.: Sexual adjustment after spinal cord injury (SCI) focusing on partner experiences. Paraplegia 32(4), 225–235 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kreuter, M., Sullivan, M., Siösteen, A.: Sexual adjustment after spinal cord injury-comparison of partner experiences in pre- and postinjury relationships. Paraplegia 32, 759–770 (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., Guyatt, G.H.: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10, 407–415 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guyatt, G.H., Osoba, D., Wu, A.W., Wyrwick, K.W., Norman, G.R.: Clinical significance consensus meeting G. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proc 77, 371–383 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norman, G.R., Sloan, J.A., Wyrwick, K.W.: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41, 582–592 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Colton, T.: Statistics in medicine. Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1974)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taleporos, G., McCabe, M.P.: The relationship between the severity and duration of physical disability and body esteem. Health Psychol Rev 20, 637–650 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strassberg, D.S., Lowe, K.: Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Arch Sex Behav 24(4), 369–382 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    New, P.W., Simmonds, F., Stevermuer, T.: A population-based study comparing traumatic spinal cord injury and non-traumatic spinal cord injury using a National rehabilitation database. Spinal Cord 49(3), 397–403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hocaloski, S., Elliott, S., Brotto, L.A., Breckon, E., McBride, K.: A mindfulness psychoeducational group intervention targeting sexual adjustment for women with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Sex Disabil 34, 183–198 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spinal Rehabilitation ServiceCaulfield Hospital, Alfred HealthMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Epworth-Monash Rehabilitation Medicine UnitMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations