Advertisement

Marine shrimp fisheries research—a mismatch on spatial and thematic needs

  • Elizabeth C. TeixeiraEmail author
  • Victor E. L. da Silva
  • Nidia N. Fabré
  • Vandick S. Batista
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Marine shrimp fishing is an economic activity of global importance due to its high profitability, but it also presents several environmental and socioeconomic problems. In a context of increasing need for fishery sustainability, scientific basis supporting fishery resources management is essential. However, evidence-based information is frequently scarce or generated by developed countries, even when resources are most abundant in areas of developing economy. Here we present a bibliometric analysis to map each country’s scientific production in relation to its marine shrimp fishery yield, along with a hurdle model with socioeconomic factors that could influence publication of articles on this subject. We observed a geographic mismatch between research needs and the places that produce them, once tropical and subtropical regions account for most of fishery yield while knowledge is produced in temperate regions where the most developed countries are concentrated. Accordingly, our model reveled that GDP was the most influential factor in number of articles, while population density had a negative effect. Concurrently, key research interests about marine shrimp fisheries tend to be basic biology topics, despite the need for conservation solutions.

Keywords

Marine shrimp Conservation Bibliometrics Management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (V.S.B., Grant Number 311038/2017-4; N.N.F., Grant Number 306624/2014-1); and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Capes.

Supplementary material

11192_2019_3276_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (3.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 3169 kb)

References

  1. Alston, J. M., Beddow, J. M., & Pardey, P. G. (2009). Agricultural research, productivity, and food prices in the long run. Science, 325, 1209–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amezcua, F., Madrid-Vera, J., & Aguirre-Villaseñor, H. (2006). Efecto de la pesca artesanal de camarón sobre la ictiofauna en el sistema lagunar de Santa María la Reforma, suroeste del Golfo de California. Ciencias Marinas, 32, 97–109.  https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v32i12.1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin, S. M. N., Arshad, A., Bujang, J. S., et al. (2009). Reproductive biology of the sergestid shrimp Acetes indicus (decapoda: Sergestidae) in coastal waters of Malacca, Peninsular Malaysia. Zoological Studies.  https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.801.814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azevedo-Santos, V. M., Fearnside, P. M., Oliveira, C. S., et al. (2017). Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 1745–1752.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, R., Macfadyen, G. (2011). A Blueprint for moving toward sustainable tropical shrimp trawl fisheries. A WWF commissioned report completed by Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd. November 2010. 114 p. Available on http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/?201770A-Blueprint-for-moving-toward-sustainable-tropical-shrimp-trawl-fisheriesS. Accessed Sept 2017.
  6. Batista, V. S., Fabré, N. N., Malhado, A. C. M., & Ladle, R. J. (2014). Tropical artisanal coastal fisheries: challenges and future directions. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 22, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2013.822463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Begossi, A., May, P. H., Lopes, P. F., et al. (2011). Compensation for environmental services from artisanal fisheries in SE Brazil: Policy and technical strategies. Ecological Economics, 71, 25–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellard, C., & Jeschke, J. (2015). A spatial mismatch between invader impacts and research publications. Conservation Biology, 30, 230–232.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12611.This.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Béné, C. (2006). Small-scale fisheries: assessing their contribution to rural. FAO Fisheries Circular, 1008, 57.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, N. J. (2016). Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 30, 582–592.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradshaw, C. J., Giam, X., & Sodhi, N. S. (2010). Evaluating the relative environmental impact of countries. PLoS ONE, 5, e10440.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caddy, J. F., & Agnew, D. J. (2004). An overview of recent global experience with recovery plans for depleted marine resources and suggested guidelines for recovery planning. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 14, 43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-005-4305-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cinner, J. E., & Bodin, O. (2010). Livelihood diversification in tropical coastal communities: a network-based approach to analyzing “livelihood landscapes”. PLoS ONE, 5, e11999.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke, T. M., Espinoza, M., Ahrens, R., & Wehrtmann, I. S. (2016). Elasmobranch bycatch associated with the shrimp trawl fishery off the pacific coast of Costa Rica, Central America. Fishery Bulletin, 114, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.7755/FB.114.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, S. J., Wesch, S., Donaldson, L. A., et al. (2017). A call for evidence-based conservation and management of fisheries and aquatic resources. Fisheries, 42, 143–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2017.1276343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowx, I. G., & Portocarrero Aya, M. (2011). Paradigm shifts in fish conservation: Moving to the ecosystem services concept. Journal of Fish Biology, 79, 1663–1680.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03144.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dellapenna, T. M., Allison, M. A., Gill, G. A., et al. (2006). The impact of shrimp trawling and associated sediment resuspension in mud dominated, shallow estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 69, 519–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.04.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devictor, V., Mouquet, N., Thuiller, W., et al. (2010). Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecology Letters.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01493.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Falagas, M. E., Karavasiou, A. I., & Bliziotis, I. A. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of global trends of research productivity in tropical medicine. Acta Tropica, 99, 155–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2016). FishStatJ - software for fishery statistical time series. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en.
  21. FAO (2017). GLOBEFISH Hilights - A quaternary update on world seafood markets. Rome. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from www.fao.org/3/a-i7332e.pdf.
  22. FAO (2018a). Analysis and information on world fish trade - Shrimp. FAO GLOBEFISH October:17–20. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from http://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/market-reports/resource-detail/en/c/338028/.
  23. FAO (2018b). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals. FAO, Rome. Retrieved October 19, 2018, from www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9540EN/.
  24. Fisher, R., Radford, B. T., Knowlton, N., et al. (2011). Global mismatch between research effort and conservation needs of tropical coral reefs. Conservation Letters, 4, 64–72.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00146.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster, S. J., & Vincent, A. C. J. (2010). Tropical shrimp trawl fisheries: Fishers’ knowledge of and attitudes about a doomed fishery. Marine Policy, 34, 437–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gálvez, A., Maqueda, M., Martínez-Bueno, M., & Valdivia, E. (2000). Scientific publication trends and the developing world. American Scientist, 88, 526–533.  https://doi.org/10.1511/2000.6.526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcia, S. M., & Rosenberg, A. A. (2010). Food security and marine capture fisheries: characteristics, trends, drivers and future perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2869–2880.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillett, R. (2008). Global study of shrimp fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 475, 331.Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths, R. A., & Dos Santos, M. (2012). Trends in conservation biology: Progress or procrastination in a new millennium? Biological Conservation, 153, 153–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, M. A., Alverson, D. L., & Metuzals, K. I. (2000). By-catch: Problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 41, 204–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00111-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansson, M., Lindegarth, M., Valentinsson, D., & Ulmestrand, M. (2000). Effects of shrimp-trawling on abundance of benthic macrofauna in Gullmarsfjorden, Sweden. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 198, 191–201.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps198191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450903037302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hassan, S. U., Haddawy, P., & Zhu, J. (2014). A bibliometric study of the world’s research activity in sustainable development and its sub-areas using scientific literature. Scientometrics, 99(2), 549–579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1193-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamieson, G. S. (1993). Marine invertebrate conservation: evaluation of fisheries over-exploitation concerns. American Zoologist, 33, 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaramillo-Legorreta, A., Rojas-Bracho, L., Brownell, R. L., et al. (2007). Saving the vaquita: Immediate action, not more data. Conservation Biology, 21, 1653–1655.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00825.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalikoski, D. C., Vasconcellos, M. C., & Lavkulich, L. (2002). Fitting institutions to ecosystems: The case of artisinal fisheries management in the estuary of Patos Lagoon. Marine Policy, 26, 179–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00048-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kapoor, I. (2001). Towards participatory environmental management? Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 269–279.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keledjian, A., Brogan, G., Lowell, B., et al. (2014). Wasted catch : Unsolved problems in U.S. fisheries. Oceana. Washington. Retrieved August 23, 2017, from http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/reports/Bycatch_Report_FINAL.pdf.
  39. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations: what different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430, 311–316.  https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2, 3436–3448.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ladle, R. J., Todd, P. A., & Malhado, A. C. M. (2012). Assessing insularity in global science. Scientometrics, 93, 745–750.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0703-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leite, N. O., Jr., & Petrere, M., Jr. (2006). Stock assessment and fishery management of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis Latreille, 1970 and F. paulensis Pérez-Farfante, 1967 in Southeastern Brazil (23° to 28° S). Brazilian Journal of Biology, 66, 263–277.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842006000200009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leopold, M., Guillemot, N., Rocklin, D., & Chen, C. (2014). A framework for mapping small-scale coastal fisheries using fishers’ knowledge. ICES Journal of Marine Science.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lokkeborg S. (2005). Impacts of trawling and scallop dredging on benthic habitats and communities, 472nd edn. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, RomeGoogle Scholar
  45. Macfadyen, G., Banks, R., & Davies, R. (2013). Tropical shrimp trawling: Developing a management blueprint and adapting and implementing it in specific countries and fisheries. Marine Policy, 40, 25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. May, R. M. (1997). The Scientific Wealth of Nations. Science, 275, 793–796.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5301.793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McManus, J. W. (1997). Tropical marine fisheries and the future of coral reefs: a brief review with emphasis on Southeast Asia. Coral Reefs, 16, 121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380050248s003380050248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Menke, K., Davis, P., & Corporation, Ebooks. (2016). Mastering QGIS: Go beyond the basics and unleash the full power of QGIS with practical, step-by-step examples (2nd ed.). Birmingham: Packt Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Murray, S. N., Ambrose, R. F., Bohnsack, J. A., et al. (1999). No-take reserve networks: sustaining fishery populations and marine ecosystems. Fisheries, 24, 11–25.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1999)024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Natale, F., Fiore, G., & Hofherr, J. (2012). Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature. Scientometrics, 90(3), 983–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oliveira Júnior, J. G. C., Silva, L. P. S., Malhado, A. C. M., et al. (2016). Artisanal fisheries research: A need for globalization? PLoS ONE, 11, 10.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orensanz, J. M. L., Armstrong, J., Armstrong, D., & Hilborn, R. (1998). Crustacean resources are vulnerable to serial depletion—The multifaceted decline of crab and shrimp fisheries in the Greater Gulf of Alaska. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 8, 117–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., et al. (2002). Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature, 418, 689–695.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pauly, D., & Zeller, D. (2003). The global fisheries crisis as a rationale for improving the FAO’s database of fisheries statistics. Fisheries Centre Research Reports, 11, 1–9.Google Scholar
  56. Plagányi, É. E., Punt, A. E., Hillary, R., et al. (2014). Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: Tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity. Fish Fisheries, 15, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00488.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Port, D., Perez, J. A. A., & Thadeu de Menezes, J. (2016). The evolution of the industrial trawl fishery footprint off southeastern and southern Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Researcheries Centre Research Reports, 44, 908–925.  https://doi.org/10.3856/vol44-issue5-fulltext-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pullin, A. S., & Stewart, G. B. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20, 1647–1656.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reis, E. G., & D’Incao, F. (2000). The present status of artisanal fisheries of extreme Southern Brazil: an effort towards community-based management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 43, 585–595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00048-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roberts, C. M., Mittermeier, C. G., & Schueler, F. W. (2006). Marine Biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science, 80(1280), 1280–1285.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salas, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Seijo, J. C., & Charles, A. (2007). Challenges in the assessment and management of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Fisheries Research, 87, 5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.06.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. SGWCPFA Inc. (2013). Fisheries management. In: About Fish. Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://www.spencergulfkingprawns.com.au/fisheries-management/.
  63. Smith, M. D., Roheim, C. A., Crowder, L. B., et al. (2010). Sustainability and global seafood. Science, 327, 784–786.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spiteri, A., & Nepal, S. K. (2006). Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: A review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management, 37, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0311-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sumathipala, A., Siribaddana, S., & Patel, V. (2004). Under-representation of developing countries in the research literature: ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals. BMC Medical Ethics, 5, 5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-5-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M., & Knight, T. M. (2004). The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 305–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Syed, S., Borit, M., & Spruit, M. (2018). Narrow lenses for capturing the complexity of fisheries: A topic analysis of fisheries science from 1990 to 2016. Fish and Fisheries, 19, 643–661.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teh, L. C. L., & Sumaila, U. R. (2011). Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish and Fisheries, 14, 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00450.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. UNDP. (2015). Goal 14: Life below water. Sustainable Development Goals.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vasconcelos, V. V., Santos, F. C., Pacheco, J. M., & Levin, S. A. (2014). Climate policies under wealth inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 2212–2216.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323479111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ward, H. G. M., Allen, M. S., Camp, E. V., et al. (2016). Understanding and managing social-ecological feedbacks in spatially structured recreational fisheries: The overlooked behavioral dimension. Fisheries, 41, 524–535.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2016.1207632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wells, R. J. D., Cowan, J. H., & Patterson, W. F. (2008). Habitat use and the effect of shrimp trawling on fish and invertebrate communities over the northern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65, 1610–1619.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Conservation and Management of Fishery ResourcesFederal University of AlagoasMaceióBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratory of Ecology, Fish and FisheriesFederal University of AlagoasMaceióBrazil

Personalised recommendations