Effects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: a comparison between subscription-based and full Open Access models
This study analyses the performance of journals and publications based on their type of archiving policies. The main objective is the assessment of the feasibility of the journal typologies with a special emphasis on the comparison of both the subscription-based and the Open Access models. The analysis is backed by the combination of data contained in four of the main bibliographic databases to offer comprehensive, new and updated data on OA (Sherpa-RoMEO, DOAJ, Web of Science and Scopus). A total of 18.3 million articles and reviews were analysed between 2005 and 2015. In the comparison of Web of Science and Scopus, we found that the proportion of OA publications is 5% inferior in WoS. The growth of the total number of documents published in Gold OA journals is noteworthy in the period analysed. However, the study of the proportion of publications and citations in both databases revealed that Gold OA journals only increased their proportion of publications but not the proportion of citations. Trends in the proportion of highly cited publications (top 1%) depicted that OA journals were unable to exceed of this expected 1% in the 11 years under analysis.
KeywordsOpen access Scientific performance Citation analysis
Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez would like to thank doctor Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka and doctor Theodore Papazoglou for valuable comments and suggestions on an early version of this article. In memory of Boris Kragelj.
- Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., et al. (2014). Proportion of Open Access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and World levels (1996–2013). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Archambault, E., Cote, G., Struck, B., & Voorons, M. (2016). Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers. Quebec: Science-Metrix and 1science.Google Scholar
- Cambridge. (2018). How much do publishers charge for Open Access? Cambridge: University. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://osc.cam.ac.uk/open-access/open-access-policies/paying-open-access/how-much-do-publishers-charge-open-access.
- Coalition-S. (2018). Plan S. Making full and immediate Open Access a reality. Brussels: Science Europe. Retrieved April 4, 2019 from https://www.coalition-s.org/.
- Crawford W. (2016). Gold Open Access journals 2011–2015. Livermore (CA): Cites & Insights Books. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://waltcrawford.name/goaj1115.pdf.
- Dorta-González, P., González-Betancor, S. M., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2016). Reconsidering the gold open Access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context: An analysis of the subject categories in the Web of Science database 2009–2014. Scientometrics, 112, 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2422-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Union. (2019). Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. ISBN: 978-92-79-97238-6, https://doi.org/10.2777/836532.
- Lavizzari, C. S., & Viljoen, R. (2015). Open Access Licensing: a legal perspective for authors, publishers, funders, repository platform operators, and other stakeholders in the communication of science. London: Publishing Research Consortium.Google Scholar
- McGuigan, G. S., & Russell, R. D. (2008). The business of academic publishing: a strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3). http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html.
- Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open Access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pastorino, R., Milovanovic, S., Stojanovic, J., Efremov, L., Amore, R., & Boccia, S. (2016). Quality assessment of studies published in Open Access and subscription journals: Results of a systematic evaluation. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Science Europe. (2018). Making full and immediate Open Access a reality. Brussels: Science Europe. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://www.coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/.
- Science-Metrix. (2018). Analytical support for bibliometrics indicators: open access availability of scientific publications. Montreal: Science-Metrix. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from http://www.science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/science-metrix_open_access_availability_scientific_publications_report.pdf.
- Suber P. (2008). Gratis and libre Open Access. SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4322580/suber_oagratis.html?sequence=1.
- Thomson, S., & Kanesarajah, V. (2017). The European Research Council: The first 10 years. London: Clarivate Analytics.Google Scholar
- Traag, V. A., & Waltman, L. (2019). Persistence of journal hierarchy in open access publishing. In 17th International conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 1339–1345). Rome (Italy).Google Scholar
- Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for Open Access to research and scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-23242-1.Google Scholar