Technology opportunity analysis based on recombinant search: patent landscape analysis for idea generation
- 30 Downloads
This research responds to the need for the use of quantitative data and scientific methods for technology opportunity analysis by focusing on idea generation. Interpreting innovation as a process of recombinant search, we propose a patent landscape analysis to generate ideas which are likely to have more novelty and value than others. For this, first, a patent landscape is constructed from patent classification information as a vector space model, where each position represents a configuration of technological components and corresponds to an idea and, if they exist, relevant patented inventions. Second, the novelty of ideas is assessed via the modified local outlier factor based on the distribution of existing patented inventions on the landscape. Finally, the value of ideas is estimated via naïve Bayes models based on the forward citations of existing patented inventions. In addition, this study also investigates the recombinant synergies between different technological components and the relationships between novelty and value of ideas. A case study of pharmaceutical technology shows that our approach can guide organisations towards setting up effective search strategies for new technology development.
KeywordsTechnology opportunity analysis Recombinant search Patent landscape analysis Idea generation Novelty Value Synergy
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grants funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. 2017R1C1B2011434).
- Basalla, G. (1998). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Chaudhuri, S. (2005). The WTO and India’s Pharmaceuticals Industry: Patent protection, TRIPS, and developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.Google Scholar
- Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarevic, A., Ertoz, L., Kumar, V., Ozgur, A., Srivastava, J. (2003). A comparative study of anomaly detection schemes in network intrusion detection. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM international conference on data mining (pp. 25–36).Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. D. (1998). Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In European conference on machine learning (pp. 4–15).Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Tan, P. N. (2006). Introduction to data mining. Delhi: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
- Usher, A. (1954). A history of mechanical invention. Cambridge, MA: Dover.Google Scholar
- USPTO. (2006). Overview of the US patent classification system (USPC), electronic document at http://www.uspto.gov.