Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 121, Issue 1, pp 595–599 | Cite as

A note on using revealed comparative advantages in scientometrics studies

  • Mohammad Javad Mansourzadeh
  • Behrooz Shahmoradi
  • Hossein Dehdarirad
  • Elmira JanaviEmail author
Article

Abstract

In recent years, revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index has been widely considered by researchers in all fields of science. This index, which was introduced by Ballassa, is an appropriate indicator for calculating the relative advantage of a country in production of a particular product or scientific specialization in different countries. Nevertheless, due to the nature of bibliometric data such as the number of documents and citations, there are often minor limitations in the calculation of RCA in scientometrics. This note seeks to outline these limitations.

Keywords

RCA Revealed comparative advantages Revealed technological advantage RTA Scientific specialization 

References

  1. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai, J., Zhao, H., & Coyte, P. C. (2018). The effect of intellectual property rights protection on the international competitiveness of the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry in China. Engineering Economics, 29(1), 62–71.  https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.1.16878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, Y.-S. (2011). Using patent analysis to explore corporate growth. Scientometrics, 88(2), 433–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0396-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crespo, J. A., Li, Y., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013). The measurement of the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices across scientific fields. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58727.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fan, X., Liu, W., & Zhu, G. (2017). Scientific linkage and technological innovation capabilities: International comparisons of patenting in the solar energy industry. Scientometrics, 111(1), 117–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2274-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. French, S. (2017). Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for? Journal of International Economics, 106, 83–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gómez, L. M. R., Fernánuez, L. R., & Navio-Marco, J. (2018). Application of communication technologies (ICT) within the tourism industry in the European Union. Tourism, 66(2), 239–245.Google Scholar
  8. Guerini, M., & Tenca, F. (2018). The geography of technology-intensive start-ups and venture capital: European evidence. Economia e Politica Industriale, 45(3), 361–386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0098-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guevara, M., & Mendoza, M. (2014). Revealing comparative advantages in the backbone of science. arXiv:1409.1911[cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1911. Accessed 28 Aug 2018.
  10. Horta, H. (2018). The declining scientific wealth of Hong Kong and Singapore. Scientometrics, 117(1), 427–447.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2845-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jambor, A., & Babu, S. (2016). Competitiveness of global: Agriculture policy lessons for food security.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44876-3.
  12. Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1), 99–115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Makhoba, X., & Pouris, A. (2019). A patentometric assessment of selected R&D priority areas in South Africa, a comparison with other BRICS countries. World Patent Information, 56, 20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1897–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1344-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. SCImago. (n.d.). SJRSCImago Journal and Country Rank. Portal. https://www.scimagojr.com/aboutus.php.
  16. Shashnov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2018). Research landscape of the BRICS countries: Current trends in research output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners. Scientometrics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2883-7.Google Scholar
  17. Soete, L. G., & Wyatt, S. M. E. (1983). The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics, 5(1), 31–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, L. (2016). The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Scientometrics, 106(1), 435–452.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1650-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Allied Medical SciencesTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsNational Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP)TehranIran
  3. 3.Department of ScientometricsNational Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations