Financial implications of technology-class code popularity and usage among industry competitors
- 65 Downloads
Novel measures of technology popularity and usage were constructed and tested to assess the returns available from patenting within mainstream versus more-exotic technology-classification codes (or pairs of codes). Popularity suggested the frequency density with which technological codes (pairs) were most frequently found among competitors’ patents. Usage measured whether firms dominated particular technology codes (or pairs of codes) relative to competitors. Firms’ financial performance varied according to whether firms followed “me-too” technological leads or patented within less-commonplace technologies. Results suggested that firms should exercise caution when spending heavily in pursuing research leads within crowded technological streams. Results also implied that some firms successfully countered popular trends in pursuing technological leads within declining arenas when industry interest went elsewhere. Since evolutionary waves of technology affected the profitability potential of industries, we used longitudinal tests within three industries that developed from various structural stages of development to illustrate the effects of demand growth and establishment of technological standards upon the patenting strategies suggested by popularity and usage measures.
KeywordsMeasures of technology popularity Measures of technology usage Patenting strategy Firms’ performance Rising technology code frequency Declining technology code frequency Technological evolution
This work was supported in part by funding from the Columbia Business School.
- Clarivate Analytics. (2018). Web of Science. Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
- Ghemawat, P. (1986). Sustainable advantage. Harvard Business Review, 64(5), 53–58.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper no. 8498.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of research-and-development – Evidence from firms patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- van Dijk, B. (2016). Osiris electronic resource. Bruges: St. Catherine Press.Google Scholar