Development strategy and collaboration preference in S&T of enterprises based on funded papers: a case study of Google
- 11 Downloads
Science funding plays a guiding role in the development direction of scientific innovation. As one of research funding providers, private companies influence the development of science and technology (S&T) through their selective support. Thus, strategy and layout of enterprises in S&T can be revealed by analysing their funded papers. Taking Google as the example, the paper proposes an analytical method of funded papers by the combination of co-word analysis, clusters analysis and social network analysis, so as to explore the scientific strategy and collaboration preference. The total 2162 valid bibliographic records of papers supported by Google from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science are divided into four groups according to discipline clusters using Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm. Social network analysis is conducted to detect communities among keywords and institutions. The results demonstrate that Google shows different funding patterns between traditional research fields and emerging industries. Famous universities are the main funding targets of Google, and the important institutions can be divided into two groups.
KeywordsFunded paper Funding strategy Collaboration preferences Scientific collaboration Hierarchical cluster analysis Social network analysis
This research is funded by the National Social Science Found Major Project of China (18ZDA325), the National Social Science Found Project of China (16BTQ055) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Independent Research Projects of Wuhan University (Humanities and Social Sciences)].
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
- Fan, D.-C, Song, Z.-L., Fang, L. (2016). 23rd Annual international conference on management science and engineering (ICMSE): Analysis of the effect of government funds, enterprise funds in industry innovation of high-tech industry—a view based on factor input. Olten, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Focused Research Awards program. (2019). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from: https://ai.google/research/outreach/focused-research-awards/.
- Google Faculty Research Awards. (2019). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from: http://www.iserp.columbia.edu/funding/google-faculty-research-awards.
- Google Ph.D. Fellowships. (2019). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from: https://ai.google/research/outreach/phd-fellowship.
- Google Summer of Code. (2019). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com.
- Google.org. (2019). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from: https://www.google.org/.
- Kang, Y. H., & Su, J. Q. (2008). Visualization of technology tracking based on co-word analysis: An empirical study of highway engineering. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 27(4), 566–571.Google Scholar
- Khuller, S., Kim, Y. A., Malekian, A. (2006). Improved algorithms for data migration. In Approximation, randomization, and combinatorial optimization. Algorithms and techniques. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- National Natural Science Foundation of China. (2018). Statistical information of National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2018. Retrieved December 15, 2018 from: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/xmtj/pdf/2018_table.pdf.
- Sun, X. G. (2010). Quantitative analysis upon fund-sponsored theses in 1998–2008 information science. Information Science, 28(4), 545–549.Google Scholar
- Wei, Z. M. (2011). Quantitative analysis upon fund-sponsored dissertations in 2006–2009 Library Tribune—again analysis following 1993–2005 this publication fund-sponsored dissertations. Library Tribune, 31(1), 52–54.Google Scholar