Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators: an altmetric analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines
In this paper we extend the perspective of the scholarly impact from the traditional citations to other forms of scientific communication among scholars in the mirror of the PlumX and Web of Science (WoS) data. There are in total eight indicators out of three categories including Captures, Citations, and Usage analysed in the study. The results of this study shows that Captures and Usage indicators measure very different aspects of research impact, although both of them show some similarity from the perspective of citations. The Characteristic Scores and Scales method was applied to different types of altmetric indicators for the first time and its robustness of the method was proved again.
KeywordsAltmetrics PlumX metrics WoS usage Citations Characteristic scores and scales
This paper is an extended version of a previous work presented at the 23rd STI Conference in Leiden, The Netherlands (Chi et al. 2018). Altmetrics data for the two chemistry disciplines was provided by courtesy of Plum Analytics. The authors thank Christina Lohr, Stephanie Faulkner and Tina Moir from Elsevier for granted trial access to PlumX. WoS Citation data were sourced from Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection.
- Chi, P. S., Gorraiz, J., & Glänzel, W. (2018). Comparisons of altmetric, usage and citation indicators in chemistry disciplines. In R. Costas, T. Franssen, & A. Yegros-Yegros (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on science and technology indicators, Leiden (pp. 174–183).Google Scholar
- de Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W., & Heeffer, S. (2014). Cross-national preferences and similarities in downloads and citations of scientific articles: A pilot study. In: E. Noyons (Ed.), Context counts: Pathways to master big and little data. Proceedings of the STI Conference 2014, (pp. 207–215). Leiden University.Google Scholar
- Gorraiz J., Blahous B., & Wieland M. (2018). Monitoring the Broader Impact of the Journal Publication Output on Country Level: A Case Study for Austria. In M. Erdt, A. Sesagiri Raamkumar, E. Rasmussen & Y. L. Theng (Eds.), Altmetrics for research outputs measurement and scholarly information management. AROSIM 2018. Communications in computer and information science, Vol. 856. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Gorraiz, J., & Gumpenberger, C. (2010). Going beyond citations: SERUM—A new tool provided by a network of libraries. Liber Quartely, 20(1), 81–93.Google Scholar