Advertisement

Collaboration and impact of research in different disciplines with international funding (from the EU and other foreign sources)

  • Fernanda MorilloEmail author
Article

Abstract

The advancement of scientific research requires an adequate investment, which calls for promoting fair political decisions about the allocation of limited resources. In this context, funders need to be properly informed to assess the results of research lines or programmes. The WoS databases can help in making decisions, since they include the funding acknowledgements of documents along with additional useful data. The purpose of this paper is to analyse, in four different disciplines, the possible relation between international funding (from the EU and other foreign sources) and collaboration and impact. WoS articles with a Spanish address and written in English are selected (period 2010–2014), classifying them according to the existence or absence of funding acknowledgements, and identifying international sponsorship and the presence of EU funds. After applying some logistic regression models, the results confirm the hypotheses, except for some unexpected findings. In general, articles with international funding present greater collaboration, especially international and larger for those supported by only other non-EU foreign funds, with some differences between disciplines. This internationally funded research also achieves the highest citation rates, being unexpectedly higher for publications sponsored by EU funds, even showing less cooperation than those supported by other foreign funds. In the same way, the proportion of articles with only national funding is not diminished by their limited percentage of collaboration. In conclusion, this paper provides interesting information, both for funders and researchers, discussing the various characteristics and disparities between disciplines and funding sources.

Keywords

WoS Funding acknowledgements Research fields International funding sources Collaboration Impact 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant CSO2014-57826-P). Valuable assistance is also acknowledged from José Manuel Rojo (Statistical Analysis Unit, CCHS-CSIC) and useful comments from two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Bordons, M., Costas, R., & Calero-Medina, C. (2018). Studying the research funding structure of countries through the analysis of funding acknowledgments. In 23rd International conference on science and technology indicators (STI 2018), September 12–14, 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/65363/STI2018_paper_195.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  2. Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2017). Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: Completeness and accuracy of collected data. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1793–1812.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2453-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begum, M., & Lewison, G. (2017). Web of Science research funding information: Methodology for its use in analysis and evaluation. Journal of Scientometric Research, 6(2), 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.6.2.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, D. (1998). The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Research Policy, 27(8), 807–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00092-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, B. Y., & Llorens, J. J. (2012). Investments in scientific research: Examining the funding threshold effects on scientific collaboration and variation by academic discipline. Policy Studies Journal, 40(4), 698–729.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00470.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1647–1661.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703–722.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705055535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Díaz-Faes, A. A., & Bordons, M. (2014). Acknowledgements in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9), 1834–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Impact of funding on scientific output and collaboration: A survey of literature. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12(04), 1350037.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649213500378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2015). How to receive more funding for your research? Get connected to the right people! PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133061.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2016). How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1093–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gök, A., Rigby, J., & Shapira, P. (2016). The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 715–730.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grassano, N., Rotolo, D., Hutton, J., Lang, F., & Hopkins, M. M. (2017). Funding data from publication acknowledgments: Coverage, uses, and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 999–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, M. H., & Huang, M. J. (2018). An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 115(2), 833–847.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2677-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaffe, A. B. (2002). Building programme evaluation into the design of public research-support programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22–34.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Langfeldt, L., Bloch, C. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2015). Options and limitations in measuring the impact of research grants-evidence from Denmark and Norway. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 256–270.  https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewison, G. (1994). Publications from the European Community’s Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP): Multinationality, acknowledgement of support, and citations. Scientometrics, 31(2), 125–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewison, G., & Dawson, G. (1998). The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 17–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacLean, M., Anderson, J., & Martin, B. R. (1998a). Identifying research priorities in public sector funding agencies: Mapping science outputs on to user needs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacLean, M., Davies, C., Lewison, G., & Anderson, J. (1998b). Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. Research Evaluation, 7(1), 7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/7.1.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mongeon, P., Brodeur, C., Beaudry, C., & Larivière, V. (2016). Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 396–404.  https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw007.Google Scholar
  24. Morillo, F. (2016). Public–private interactions reflected through the funding acknowledgements. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1193–1204.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2032-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morillo, F., & Álvarez-Bornstein, B. (2018). How to automatically identify major research sponsors selecting keywords from the WoS Funding Agency field. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1755–1770.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2947-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nomaler, Ö., Frenken, K., & Heimeriks, G. (2013). Do more distant collaborations have more citation impact? Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 966–971.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rigby, J. (2011). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365–375.  https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13164389670392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, J., Lee, Y. N., & Walsh, J. P. (2018). Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects. Research Policy, 47(6), 1070–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563–586.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0117727.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu, D., Yuan, L., Li, R., & Li, J. (2018). Decomposing inequality in research funding by university-institute sub-group: A three-stage nested Theil index. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1312–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yan, E., Wu, C., & Song, M. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics, 115(1), 369–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao, D. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0191-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IFS, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations