Technical research innovations of the US national security system
- 26 Downloads
Since the Second World War the US defense has been a major participant in the development of radical innovations in information and communication technologies (ICT’s), most famously probably the digital computer and the internet. A regularly present, but less known creator of R&D innovations is the intelligence community. To understand the role and impact of defense and intelligence-related research for driving ICT innovations, we analyzed which technological paradigms were promoted by US defense and intelligence agencies and the development of these research trajectories over time. Using bibliographic analysis, we clustered 82,239 scientific papers funded by the US national security system, published between 2009–2017, in research fronts, and after that aggregated the research fronts into technological paradigms. Our analysis identified main technological paradigms promoted by the US defense’s sectoral system of innovation, such as quantum science and graphene as fields that could generate high impact in the new generation of radical technologies. The efforts of intelligence agencies was highly concentrated on quantum science, social forecasting, computer cognition and signal processing. Our research highlights the role of US security players in shaping research fields.
KeywordsInnovation Technological paradigm Technological trajectory National security Intelligence Bibliographic analysis
Mathematics Subject Classification91C20
Author R. Fileto Maciel has received research grants from Federal Police of Brazil (Polícia Federal do Brasil - Grant Number 08350.014739/2016-14). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Police of Brazil. We thank Vladmir Brito and Mark van der Giessen for comments on a previous version.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Atwood, C. P. (2015). Activity-based intelligence revolutionizing military intelligence analysis. Joint Force Quarterly, 77, 24–33.Google Scholar
- Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CWTS—Centre for Science and Technology Studies—Leiden University. (2018). Fields. http://www.leidenranking.com/information/fields.
- Daugherty Miles, A. (2016). Intelligence community spending: Trends and issues. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R44381.pdf.
- Kas, M., Khadka, A. G., Frankenstein, W., Abdulla, A. Y., Frank Kunkel, L., Carley, R., et al. (2012). Analyzing scientific networks for nuclear capabilities assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1294–1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Vol. II. 2. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969660.
- National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global trends 2030: Alternative worlds. https://doi.org/ISBN 978-1-929667-21-5.
- OECD. (2018). Main science and technology indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and United States Intelligence community. (2014). FY2015-2019 IC S&T INVESTMENT LANDSCAPE: ensuring future capabilities align to mission needs. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/atf/FY2015-2019IC_S&T_Investment_Landscape.pdf.
- Ruttan, V. W. (2006). Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. December 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195188047.001.0001.
- The United States Intelligence Community. (2018). Member Agencies. https://www.intelligence.gov/how-the-ic-works.
- United States President. (2017). Organization of the national security council, the homeland security council, and subcommittees. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3021.