Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 771–787 | Cite as

Structural characteristics of institutional collaboration in North Korea analyzed through domestic publications

  • Han Woo ParkEmail author
  • Jungwon Yoon
Article

Abstract

Stimulated by the Panmunjom Declaration on April 27, 2018, the authors have started identifying valid data sources and reliable standard methods to step inside North Korea. Taking a North Korea national approach to innovative capabilities, this research explores the status and structural characteristics of institutional collaboration during the year 2015. To accomplish this, the study takes a network analysis using co-authored publications in order to uncover the configuration of interaction based on the development of collaborative networks among various actors beyond the political sector. Data were obtained from a North Korean publication with a particular focus on innovation. Results show that while the political system strongly coordinates the North Korean innovation system, better linkage of research and production is needed in science-based problems, including better collaboration between universities.

Keywords

North Korea Semantic network analysis Co-authorship network Scientometrics Domestic publication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We extend our thanks to Young-Seok Baek and Hyun-Kyu Choi for helping us with data collection.

References

  1. Bedeski, R. (2017). The Korean State and candlelight democracy: Paradigms and evolution. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 16(2), 82–92.Google Scholar
  2. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UNICET 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis [computer program]. Needham: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  3. Choi, C., & Kang, Y. (2015). An analysis of science and technology journals in North Korea. KDI Working paper (in Korean).Google Scholar
  4. Choi, H. K., & Kang, Y. S. (2017). Current status of research institute for science and technology in North Korea. Seoul: KISTI. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  5. Choi, H. K., & No, K. R. (2016). Analysis of international scientific publication (SCI) by North Korean scientists. Seoul: KISTI. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  6. Choi, S., Yang, J. S., & Park, H. W. (2015a). The triple helix and international collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(1), 201–212.Google Scholar
  7. Choi, S., Yang, J. S., & Park, H. W. (2015b). Quantifying the triple helix relationship in scientific research: Statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries. Quality and Quantity, 49(4), 1381–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung, S. (2001). Unification of South and North Korean innovation system. Technovation, 21, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiscutean, A. (2018). What science is like in North Korea. https://theoutline.com/post/2944/what-science-is-like-in-north-korea?zd=1&zi=53zfjbn5. Accessed 1 March 2019.
  10. Jalali, S. M. J., & Park, H. W. (2018). State of the art in business analytics: Themes and collaborations. Quality and Quantity, 52(2), 627–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeong, G. H., & Huh, S. (2017a). Bibliometric analysis of publications from North Korea indexed in the web of science core collection from 1988 to 2016. Science Editing, 4(1), 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeong, G. H., & Huh, S. (2017b). Bibliometric and content analysis of medical articles in the PubMed database published by North Korean authors from 1997 to July 2017. Science Editing, 4(2), 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jung, K., & Park, H. W. (2015). A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea’s “Open Public Data” policy. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 353–358.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, H. J. (2018). An interview with Hankyoreh newspaper. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/science/science_general/845495.html. Accessed 21 May 2018.
  15. Kim, S. C. (2002). The level of technology in North Korea from the North Korean Journal titled Innovation. Unification Economy 81 (in Korean). http://www.nktech.net/inform/research/research_v.jsp.
  16. Kim, S. G. (2016). Content analysis of North Korea Journal of Internal Medicine. Paper presented at 2016 Spring conference of Korean Academy of Unification Medical Health, Seoul, Korea (in Korean).Google Scholar
  17. Kwon, K. H. (2017). A paradoxical mind shift as a South Korean experiencing the North Korean threat. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 16(2), 145–147.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, M. K., Yoon, H. Y., Smith, M., Park, H. J., & Park, H. W. (2017). Mapping a twitter scholarly communication network: A case of the association of internet researchers’ conference. Scientometrics, 112(2), 767–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. No, K. R., Kim, E. J., & Choi, H. K. (2016). A study on the production of science and technology knowledge in North Korea through International Academic Papers. Journal for Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4), 205–227. (in Korean).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Omar, M., Mehmood, A., Choi, G. S., & Park, H. W. (2017). Global mapping of artificial intelligence in Google and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1269–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, H. W. (2014a). An interview with Loet Leydesdorff: The past, present, and future of the triple helix in the age of big data. Scientometrics, 99(1), 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park, H. W. (2014b). Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Cambell. Scientometrics, 99(1), 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, H. W. (2018a). YouTubers’ networking activities during the 2016 South Korea earthquake. Quality and Quantity, 52(3), 1057–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park, H. W. (2018b). Examining YouTube channel in North Korea: A case of ‘North Korea Today’ using user response and text analyses. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 20(5), 2581–2592. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  25. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377–1387. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  26. Park, H. J., & Park, H. W. (2018). Two-side face of knowledge building using scientometric analysis. Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2815–2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park, H. W., Yoon, J. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016). The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: The government stimulation programs of China and Korea. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1017–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shelton, R. D., & Lewison, G. (2013). Scientific collaboration as a window and a door into North Korea. Scientometrics, 97(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Noorden, R. (2018). Science in North Korea: How easing the nuclear stand-off might bolster research. Nature. News, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05027-x. Accessed 1 March 2019.
  30. Wyatt, S., Milojević, S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). The intellectual and practical contributions of scientometrics to STS. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. Miller & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (4th edn). Boston: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoon, J. W., Yang, J. S., & Park, H. W. (2017). Quintuple helix Structure of Sino-Korean research collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 113(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media and Communication, Interdisciplinary Program of Digital Convergence Business, Interdisciplinary program of East Asian Cultural StudiesYeungnam UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Division of Interdisciplinary Industrial StudiesHanyang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations