Missing documents in Scopus: the case of the journal Enfermeria Nefrologica
In a recent paper, a group of researchers estimated various bibliometric indicators for the Spanish journal Enfermeria Nefrologica using the software “Publish or Perish”, retrieving data exclusively from Google Scholar. Since their study revealed an unusual high number of citations for the documents published by the journal, we became interested in repeating the bibliometric analysis using data from Scopus. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a high variability in the number of documents published each year. Therefore, the journal’s website was accessed to confirm whether this irregularity was due to the journal’s publication frequency. According to the data collected, only 50.2% of the documents published by the journal between 2006 and 2017 were registered by Scopus. Such omission-induced errors raise concerns about the validity of various indicators. This study shows that while Scopus needs to improve its quality control systems, editorial management teams need to routinely check the information being indexed by the databases.
KeywordsScopus Missing issues Missing documents Indexing Journal
This work was supported by the Grant Proyecto de Financiamiento Basal AFB170004.
- Cobo Sanchez, J. L., Ochando Garcia, A., Blanco Mavillard, I., Cirera Segura, F., Crespo Monteo, R., & Casas Cuesta, R. (2018). Análisis del impacto del a producción científica de la revista Enfermería Nefrológica entre 1998–2017. Enfermeria Nefrologica, 21(4), 349–358.Google Scholar
- Lopez-Cozar, E.D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012) Manipulating Google Scholar citations and Google Scholar metrics: Simple, easy and tempting. ArXiv Preprint. 2012. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/labs/1212.0638. Accessed January 27, 2019.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 24, 348–349.Google Scholar
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus. In ISSI 2017—16th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, conference proceedings (pp. 1087–1092).Google Scholar