Highly cited researchers: a moving target
Highly cited researchers are a category of researchers defined by scientometric rules relating to counts of citations to their scholarly articles. The designation often refers to researchers identified according to scientometric rules specified by the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) and its commercial affiliates; we denote these categories as HCR. The 2001 ISI rules (HRC.1) used membership thresholds derived from the total citation counts to an author’s corpus in a specified research field and time window. The modified 2013 rules also include counts of individual highly cited publications (HCR.2), while the foreshadowed 2018 rules introduce the concept of cross-field influence (HCR.3). The HCR category is a popular, albeit flawed, indicator of outstanding individual researchers. HCR membership has been used as the basis for many studies of research excellence, including the use of an institution’s HCR count as an indicator in the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). The paper traces the development of the HCR category and its use by ARWU, providing insights into the social construction of research indicators and their potential to change research practice.
KeywordsAcademic rankings World class universities Indicators Highly cited researcher
The work of D. Docampo was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Galician Regional Government under agreement for funding the Atlantic Research Center for Information and Communication Technologies (AtlantTIC), as well as by the Government of Spain through the Salvador de Madariaga Program.
Additional information relating to the work reported here is deposited for open access in Technical Reports and other data sets at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Domingo_Docampo/publications.
- Analytics, C. (2018). New this year: Cross-field category. Clarivate Analytics. https://feedback.hcr.clarivate.com/new-this-year/. Accessed November 23, 2018.
- Anon. (2004). Citation Laureate Awarded to psychiatrist. Australiasian Psychiatry, 12(2), 204.Google Scholar
- Anon. (2018). Back to the future: Institute for Scientific Information re-established within Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/blog/news/back-future-institute-scientific-information-re-established-within-clarivate-analytics/. Accessed March 28, 2018.
- ARWU. (2012). Methodology for the computation of the HiCi indicator. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2012.html. Accessed October 19, 2015.
- Burns, J., Brenner, A., Kiser, K., Krot, M., Llewellyn, C., & Snyder, R. (2009). JSTOR-data for research. In International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries (pp. 416–419). Springer.Google Scholar
- Clarivate Analytics. (2018a). Highly cited researchers: Archived lists. https://clarivate.com/hcr/researchers-list/archived-lists/. Accessed June 12, 2018.
- Clarivate Analytics. (2018b). Highly cited researchers: Metholdology. https://clarivate.com/hcr/methodology/. Accessed June 12, 2018.
- Clarivate Analytics. (2018c). New this year: Cross-field category. https://feedback.hcr.clarivate.com/new-this-year/. Accessed 23 Nov 2018.
- Cronin, B. (2005). A hundred million acts of whimsy? Current Science - Bangalore, 89(9), 1505.Google Scholar
- De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
- Fernández-Cano, A., Curiel-Marin, E., Torralbo-Rodríguez, M., & Vallejo-Ruiz, M. (2018). Questioning the Shanghai Ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: An integrative review. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2069–2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2814-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1957). Breaking the subject index barrier-a citation index for chemical patents. Journal of the Patent Office Society, 39, 583.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1967). Current contents ninth anniversary. Essays of an Information Scientist, 1(12), 12–15.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1978). The 100 most-cited SSCI authors, 1969–1977. Essays of an Information Scientist, 3, 633–639.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1998). On the origins of current contents and ISI. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/origins_cc_isi.html. Accessed January 13, 2016.
- Lane, P. (1992). Thomson corporation acquires majority interest in ISI. Information Today, 9(5), 1–2.Google Scholar
- McVeigh, M. E. (2004). How does ISI identify highly cited researchers. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20040213102413/http://highlycited.com/isi_copy/comm_news08.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2013.
- Morse, R., & Krivian, A. (2017). How U.S. News calculated the best global universities rankings. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology. Accessed June 17, 2018 .
- Pendlebury, D. A. (2014). Methodology: Thomson reuters citation laureates. http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/images/basic/methodology_citation_laureate_2014.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2015.
- Thomson-ISI. (2000). Japan’s citation laureates, 1981–98. Retreived from http://web.archive.org/web/20081014043920/http://archive.sciencewatch.com/nov-dec2000/sw_nov-dec2000_page1.htm. Accessed 2 March 2015.
- Thomson-ISI. (2001). ISI Launches ISIHighlyCited.com. http://www.infotoday.com/IT/apr01/news7.htm. Accessed June 25, 2015 .
- Thomson-ISI (2008). How do we identify highly cited researchers? http://archive.li/XJtCF. Accessed November 19, 2018.
- Thomson Reuters. (2014). Methodology for identifying highly-cited researchers. http://www.highlycited.com/methodology/. Accessed October 19, 2015.
- USPTO. (2001). highlycited.com. United States Patent and Trademark Office. http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4810:do7p7v.2.1. Accessed November 19, 2018.
- Yap, S. (2016). Onex, Baring PE Asia complete $3.55b acquisition of Thomson Reuters unit. https://www.dealstreetasia.com/stories/54724-54724/. Accessed March 28, 2018.