Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 645–652 | Cite as

Publishing in English or another language: An inclusive study of scholar’s language publication preferences in the natural, social and interdisciplinary sciences

  • Daniel Stockemer
  • Michael J. WiggintonEmail author
Article

Abstract

To what extent has English become the dominant language of scientific communication? What factors push non-native speakers to publish their research in English rather than their native language? Using a survey of more than 800 authors of scientific papers in Springer Nature journals we find that the average non-anglophone researcher makes approximately 60% of their journal submissions in English. This percentage varies across disciplines, regions, and age groups, with younger scholars, Europeans, and those in the natural sciences favouring English more heavily. Finally, we find that the belief that publishing in English will increase the reputation of one’s work is a primary motivator; in contrast, perceived institutional pressures to publish in English do not seem to influence researchers’ language choice.

Keywords

Scientific communication Academic publishing Multilingual scholars Language of science English as an international language 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Springer Nature for allowing us to use their survey on language choice in academic publications for this short article.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2007). The imperial tongue: English as the dominating academic language. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(36), 3608–3611.Google Scholar
  2. Benfield, J. R., & Howard, K. M. (2000). The language of science. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 18(6), 642–648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00595-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braine, G. (2002). Academic literacy and the nonnative speaker graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00006-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canagarajah, A. S. (1996). “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13(4), 435–472.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cho, S. (2004). Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of nonnative-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 3(1), 47–72.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0301_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663–688.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M. (2010). Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 29(4), 281–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duszak, A., & Lewkowicz, J. (2008). Publishing academic texts in English: A Polish perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 108–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121–150.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flowerdew, J. (2012). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127–150.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giannoni, D. S. (2008). Medical writing at the periphery: The case of Italian journal editorials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gingras, Y. (1984). La valeur d’une langue dans un champ scientifique. Recherches sociographiques, 25(2), 285–296.  https://doi.org/10.7202/056095ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Google Scholar. (2018). Google scholar metrics. Accessed October 29, 2018, from https://scholar.google.ca/citations?view_op=top_venues.
  17. Işık-Taş, E. E. (2018). Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers’ discourse choices. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 26–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 12(3), 215–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. López-Navarro, I., Moreno, A. I., Quintanilla, M. Á., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2015). Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains. Scientometrics, 103(3), 939–976.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1570-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lublin, D. (2018). The case for English. European Political Science, 17(3), 358–365.  https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rocher, F., & Stockemer, D. (2017). Langue de publication des politologues francophones du Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 97–120.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423917000075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Uysal, H. H. (2014). Turkish academic culture in transition: Centre-based state policies and semiperipheral practices of research, publishing and promotion. In K. Bennett (Ed.), The semiperiphery of academic writing: Discourses, communities and practices (pp. 165–188). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 250–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Political StudiesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations