Science in Mexico: a bibliometric analysis
We can find several studies analyzing the scientific production of Latin American countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Guatemala, Peru, Venezuela etc throughout the scientific literature. There are many papers focusing on scientific disciplines, institutions and journals from these countries. However, to the best of our knowledge, we have not found any article that analyzes the scientific production of Mexico, global or recent and with Scopus as a specific database, nor the production in collaboration with its strategic countries in science and technology. For this reason, the present work intends to give Mexico the prominence it deserves by studying its productivity in research by using a bibliometric approach. To perform this study, the international bibliographic database Scopus was used within a ten year publication window from 2007 to 2016. With this sample, we analyzed the production in general, the scientific production in scientific disciplines, and production in collaboration with its strategic countries in science and technology, without forgetting the variables of the citations received from Scival as a parameter of impact on research. This study aims to serve as a precedent for later studies and contribute as a reference of Mexican production to the scientific community and as a tool to elaboration of national public policy in science and technology.
KeywordsScientific production Scientific production by disciplines Scientific collaboration Strategic partners of Mexico Citations received Mexico
We are grateful to Tecnologico de Monterrey, which supported this study through the Intelligent Systems Group and Elsevier to develop this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Aksnes, D. W., Sivertsen, G., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wendt, K. K. (2017). Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 246–258.Google Scholar
- CAICYT-CONICET. (2007). Evolution of the argentina scientific production in science citation index 1990–2004. Revista argentina de Endocrinologia y Metabolismo, 44(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
- Castillo-Pérez, J. J., Muñoz-Valera, L., García-Gómez, F., & Mejía-Aranguré, J. M. (2015). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica sobre la influenza en México, 2000–2012. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 53(3), 294–301.Google Scholar
- CONACYT. (2016). National general report of science, technology and innovation. Retrieved from http://www.siicyt.gob.mx/index.php/transparencia/informes-conacyt/informe-general-del-estado-de-la-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion/informe-general-2016. Accessed 05 July 2018.
- CONACYT. (2018). National general report of science, technology and innovation. http://www.siicyt.gob.mx/index.php/transparencia/informes-conacyt/informe-de-actividades/4708-inf-actividades-2018-ene-mzo/file. Accessed 08 October 2018.
- de Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, F., & Baker, D. (2017). Science production in the United States: An unexpected synergy between mass higher education and the super research University. In J. J. W. Powell, D. P. Baker, & F. Fernandez (Eds.), The century of science (international perspectives on education and society) (Vol. 33, pp. 85–111). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W. (2018). Bibliometrics. A concise introduction to bibliometrics & its history. https://www.ecoom.be/en/research/bibliometrics. Accessed 30 October 2018.
- Herrera-Vallejera, D., Sánchez-Perdomo, R., Rosario-Sierra, M., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, Y. (2017). Scientometrics study of scientific activity in Cuba in the fields of natural sciences and engineering, mathematics and computer science. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 31(72), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nalimov, V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometrija: Izuchenije razvitijanauki kak Informacinnege process. M: Nauka, 192.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2017). Scientometrics-science, technology and industry scoreboard 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/scientometrics.htm. Accessed 30 October 2018.
- OECD. (2018). Science and innovation: Country notes: Mexico. http://www.oecd.org/mexico/41559276.pdf. Accessed 01 November 2018.
- OECD & SCImago Research Group (CSIC). (2016). Compendium of bibliometric science indicators. OECD, Paris. http://oe.cd/scientometrics. Accessed 30 October 2018.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348–349.Google Scholar
- Rivera, R., Sampedro, J. L., & Dutrenit, G. (2009). How productive are academic researchers in agriculture related sciences? The Mexican case. Working paper series. Resource document. United Nations University—Maastricht Economic and social Research and training center on Innovation and Technology. http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/abstract/?id=3787. Accessed 01 November 2018.
- Rojas-Sola, J. I., & Jorda-Albinana, B. (2010). Bibliometric analysis of Venezuelan scientific publications in the ecology category of the Web of Science database (1997–2008). Interciencia, 35(8), 619–623.Google Scholar
- SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR). (2018). SCImago research group. http://www.scimagojr.com/. Accessed 25 December 2018.
- Scopus. (2018). https://www.scopus.com/home.uri. Accessed 25 December 2018.
- Spinak, E. (1996). Los análisis cuantitativos de la literatura científica y su validez para juzgar la producción latinoamericana. Boletín de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana, 120(2), 139–146.Google Scholar
- VOSviewer Manual. (2017). Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.6 by Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman. http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.6.pdf. Accessed 01 November 2018.