, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 1053–1080 | Cite as

Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough

  • Andrey E. GuskovEmail author
  • Denis V. Kosyakov
  • Irina V. Selivanova


The Russian project for enhancing competitive ability enforced top 21 universities to stimulate the research output actively. The results surpassed expectations with the fivefold increase in the number of publications from 2010 to 2016. This paper discusses the background and reasons for this phenomenal rise and explores in detail the most significant strategies to boost research productivity and publication output. In our study, a classification of university publications is proposed in accordance with the strategies for stimulating the publication activity, mainly corresponding with the set of measures applied by university management. The analysis made it possible to rank the strategies for contributing to the growth of publication activity, to identify the leading strategies for individual universities, and showed a significant difference between universities in the set of explicitly or implicitly applied strategies. The most effective strategy was the Additional paper, associated with the authors, indicated the affiliation of the university as complementary to their main institution. The next most important and fastest growing was the Russian conferences strategy thanks to the efforts of the organizers of domestic conferences to promote their proceedings in Scopus. A notable place is also occupied by the strategy connected with the attraction of prominent authors, which we called Headhunted author. It was possible to determine the role of the Predatory journals strategy in the growth of the publication activity, fortunately, this strategy turned out to be highly localized in only 2 of the 21 universities participating in the project and is visibly declining. It was possible to show that the share of publications in domestic journals, despite the constant increase in their presence in Scopus is steadily falling in the case of leading universities. One of the significant results of the study is an assessment of the dynamics of the average authors’ productivity, which grows insignificantly and almost reached one article per author per year. This fact also shows that the growth of publication activity of top Russian universities is mainly associated with an increase in the number of faculty involved.


Research output Russian universities University rankings Bibliometric analysis Science policy Research evaluation 5top100 project 



The authors would like to thank Vadim N. Gureyev, Ph.D. for text improvements and valuable feedback.


  1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Pacheco, I. F. (2012). Paying the professoriate: A global comparison of compensation and contracts. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aref’ev, A. L. (2015). On participation of Russian universities in international ranks. Rossiya reformiruyuschayasya, 13, 213–231.Google Scholar
  3. Block, M., & Khvatova, T. (2017). University transformation: Explaining policy making and trends in higher education in Russia. Journal of Management Development, 36(6), 761–779. Scholar
  4. Chou, C. P., & Ching, G. (2012). Taiwan education at the crossroad. When globalization meets localization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Galazhinskiy, E. V., & Kollantai, J. A. (2016). Academic publishing at National Research Tomsk State University. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 1, 21–23.Google Scholar
  6. Garousi, V., & Fernandes, J. M. (2017). Quantity versus impact of software engineering papers: A quantitative study. Scientometrics, 112(2), 963–1006. Scholar
  7. Gokhberg, L., Kuznetsova, T., & Zaichenko, S. (2009). Towards a new role of universities in Russia: Prospects and limitations. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 121–126. Scholar
  8. Guskov, A., Kosyakov, D., & Selivanova, I. (2017). Strategies to improve publication activities of the universities participating in Project 5-100. Nauchnye I Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries, 12, 5–18.Google Scholar
  9. Ivanov, V. V., Libkind, A. N., & Markusova, V. A. (2014). Publication activity and research cooperation between higher education institutions and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(1), 28–34. Scholar
  10. Ivanov, V. V., Markusova, V. A., & Mindeli, L. E. (2016). Government investments and the publishing activity of higher educational institutions: Bibliometric analysis. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 86(4), 314–321. Scholar
  11. Klochikhin, E. A. (2012). Russia’s innovation policy: Stubborn path-dependencies and new approaches. Research Policy, 41(9), 1620–1630. Scholar
  12. Kotsemir, M., & Shashnov, S. (2017). Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1659–1689. Scholar
  13. Kupershtokh, N., & Apolonskiy, A. (2014). Physics in Novosibirsk and Akademgorodok. Physics in Perspective, 16(2), 250–276. Scholar
  14. Lee, G. (2000). Brain Korea 21: A development-oriented national policy in Korean higher education. International Higher Education, 19, 24–25. Scholar
  15. Mazov, N. A., & Gureev, V. N. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of the flow of publications by Novosibirsk State University in collaboration with the RAS Siberian Branch. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 87(5), 445–453. Scholar
  16. Mokhnacheva, Y. V., & Kharybina, T. N. (2011). Research performance of RAS institutions and Russian universities: A comparative bibliometric analysis. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 81(6), 569–574. Scholar
  17. Osipov, I. A. (2016). Return on publications (RoP) and the changing nature of the ‘science enterprise’. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 1, 19–21.Google Scholar
  18. Poldin, O., Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Yudkevich, M. (2017). Publication activities of Russian universities: The effects of Project 5-100. Voprosy Obrazovaniya/Educational Studies Moscow, 2, 10–35. Scholar
  19. Rodionov, D. G., Yaluner, E. V., & Kushneva, O. A. (2014). Race to the top: The government programme “5-100-2020”. Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina, 6(2), 69–86.Google Scholar
  20. Shin, J. C. (2009). Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project. Higher Education, 58(5), 669–688. Scholar
  21. Turko, T., Bakhturin, G., Bagan, V., Poloskov, S., & Gudym, D. (2016). Influence of the program “5-top 100” on the publication activity of Russian universities. Scientometrics, 109(2), 769–782. Scholar
  22. Yonezawa, A., & Shimmi, Y. (2015). Transformation of university governance through internationalization: Challenges for top universities and government policies in Japan. Higher Education, 70(2), 173–186. Scholar
  23. Zhang, H., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. (2013). Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project. Research Policy, 42(3), 765–775. Scholar
  24. Ziyatdinova, I., & Valeeva, R. (2012). Reforms in the systems of higher professional education in China and Russia: Late XXth–early XXIst centuries. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 5, 96–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The State Public Scientific Technological LibrarySiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussian Federation
  2. 2.Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and GeophysicsSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations